Although I think this also has applications as a mechanical control mechanism, replacing expensive potentiometers with relatively cheaper 3D-printed parts. I've dreamed-up an optical/laser variant in my head a hundred times, fun to look at it in the audio domain.
For long sustained sounds using evenly space round rods can create sound with wind, like an Aeolean harp.
- adaptive sports for visually impaired players like beep baseball?
- robot swarm members knowing their relative 2d position with a single microphone? (frequency for angle, amplitude for distance)
- a cheap, durable way for human workers to track the rotation cadence of slowly rotating machinery?
Bloody hell, I can't do all that...
I wonder how they discovered that "clicking" works, seems so counterintuitive to discover. Though it's fair that I don't spend anywhere near that much time listening carefully and noticing how sharp sounds reflect.
I won't think it's they unexpected - have a walk a forest with loud insects. You'll hear a lot of interesting noises shaped a lot by what you stand near to. Large trees especially change how you hear things quite a lot.
2. Define a goal function describing the desired outcome (like the "rainbow" shape of the linked article)
3. Permute the shape you started with iteratively with algorithms like simulated annealing, using the goal function from 2 as a means of defining the quality of the current solution.
The actual scientific paper (https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.ads7497) is worth reading. The goal function is the "Figure Of Merit" (FOM), described in equation 1. They also make a two-prong version they call the "lambda emitter" that takes in a mix of sound frequencies and directs low and high-frequency sound waves in different directions.
Genetic algorithm would be one approach. You map the printable shape space onto a bit vector and define a fitness function (optimization objective function) to guide the search. Hardest part is coming up with a fitness function that gives you what you want, this gets tricky when you are trying to balance multiple constraints.
Perhaps if they added some more constraints (e.g. on smoothness) they would end up with a shape like that.
3d printers and search algorithms don't have that restriction and can directly optimize for optimal splitting and minimal acoustic losses.
This object is sort of an eversion of a cochlea. Perhaps it could be made with a "nice" shape, but I wouldn't assume so.
I suppose the thing is linear? So it behaves like a Fourier transform?
It made me realize how little design attention we actually give to sound. Most of the time we just passively listen, without thinking about shaping the path of sound. If structures like this can be made smaller and more portable, I can see a lot of interesting use cases in phones or compact voice-controlled systems.
More seriously, great concepts for architects to scale up and control noise?
What's wrong with resonance-based systems? I have to wonder if their side lobes and frequency range would be better if they used resonance
GloamingNiblets•7mo ago
ttoinou•7mo ago
WJW•7mo ago
GloamingNiblets•7mo ago