Using drone imagery and AI to rapidly assess damage after hurricanes and floods

https://stories.tamu.edu/news/2025/07/28/ai-turns-drone-footage-into-disaster-response-maps-in-minutes/

48•rbanffy•6mo ago

Comments

imoverclocked•6mo ago

I love that we are doing this but I hate that we aren't fixing the root cause of most natural disasters we will be seeing in the coming centuries.

yieldcrv•6mo ago

That’s valid, different people are working on that

imoverclocked•6mo ago

Agreed. Though, at some point humanity would likely benefit from seeing itself as just humanity and not "us vs them" on this front.

vouaobrasil•6mo ago

Are they, though? Last time I checked, CO2 is going up without any "flattening of the curve". And whenever mainstream environmentalists annonce X megawatts added to the grid, a tech company announces that they need Y > X megawatts for AI. Plastic production goes up steadily without cessation every year, and there's still immense amounts of deforestation.

No, people "working" on it are intellectually amusing themselves with technology that could be a workable solution if only everyone actually took action and reduced their consumption, which doesn't need that technology in the first place. Pretty much all mainstream solutions are just psychological salves to make us think we are doing something.

Working on it, yeah right. We simply need to make significant reductions in CO2 output and no one is doing that.

Furthermore, technologies like this will make people less likely to do something about the root problem because it ameliorates it.

t0lo•6mo ago

There is and always will be sizeable work on it. Current work has been termed "greenhushing" by the economist due to the need to be discreet in America due to a pretty intellectually lacking voterbase. Over a billion will likely starve and that is a moral failure that we will all carry for the rest of our lives but 3 people dying in a car crash is better than 4 people dying in a car crash.

You’ve been given free access to this article from The Economist as a gift. You can open the link five times within seven days. After that it will expire.

The remarkable rise of “greenhushing” https://www.economist.com/business/2025/07/29/the-remarkable...

vouaobrasil•6mo ago

I'm afraid the gift already expired, perhaps due to others accesing the article, but I appreciate the link nonetheless.

parineum•6mo ago

The "rise" of greenhushing sounds a lot more like a decline in green pandering.

literalAardvark•6mo ago

> We simply need to make significant reductions in CO2 output

Gee, I wonder why no one's thought about that except you.

Maybe because it's actually incredibly difficult to do

vouaobrasil•6mo ago

A rather sarcastic reply, but I never intended to be original nor surprising. I'm afraid I had to point out the obvious, and for that I apologize as it is almost painful, but the OP statement of "people are working on it" is also equally painful in how obviously ineffectual it is.

literalAardvark•6mo ago

It's ineffectual because the task is impossible under current governance. We'll need to hit rock bottom before anything moves, because all the systems we have in place work against any economically hurtful policies.

vouaobrasil•6mo ago

Well that is true. No argument there. We do need to hit rock bottom, because humans only respond to immediate pain. We are too stupid to collectively work together.

pyrale•6mo ago

It's not difficult, we know what to do, and we know how to do it. We simply don't want to do it.

It's incredibly difficult in the same sense that it's "incredibly difficult" for a teenager to clean their bedroom. They could do it, and they will if forced to, but they'll drag their feet as much as possible.

vouaobrasil•6mo ago

That is right. Worldwide quarantine was also an even more difficult task in some ways if you really think about it but the world was much better at that (even if some countries lagged behind) because there was an immediate pain felt, not unlike a parent threatening the immediate revocation of priveleges. With climate change, there is no such immediate threat to the average high-consumption individual.

yieldcrv•6mo ago

Ok. The point was that this drone solution by individuals at one university doesn’t detract from other people’s work and it’s a non sequitur to suggest otherwise.

vouaobrasil•6mo ago

Well, that point itself is invalid. Because ameliorations such as the mapping solution actually makes it less likely that people will do something about the root cause – same as air conditioning makes it less likely that the rich will care about a warming climate.

pjmlp•6mo ago

Like the current increase in wars and their impact on destroying what is left of the planet, after we all started using paper straws?

RcouF1uZ4gsC•6mo ago

Is it really most disasters as in more than 50%?

Aren’t earthquakes completely unrelated to climate change?

And hurricanes have happened long before climate change.

And flooding.

No matter what, this is a good technology to have and develop.

OtherShrezzing•6mo ago

>Is it really most disasters as in more than 50%?

This is an absolute minefield of statistics to get into. 90% of all disasters are influenceable by climate change (not an earthquake or volcanic eruption for example). Of that 90%, almost all are currently exacerbated - either in scope, size, or frequency- by climate change.

The IPCC releases a fairly accessible 20 page summary [0], including high-quality citations, and levels-of-confidence. That document gives a good overview of the scale of this problem. It's not reasonable to say that there are 100% more disasters now than there were before anthropogenic climate change. It is reasonable to say that >50% of natural disasters are noticeably exacerbated by anthropogenic climate change.

[0] https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6...

drcode•6mo ago

great to learn from the headline that this tech only works for disaster response maps, and isn't usable for other types of maps, like mapping out the front lines of a war

pjmlp•6mo ago

A matter of time, people in power will take care of that.

Then a flight plan will be uploaded to the Tet style drones to carry on their duties.

ta8903•6mo ago

The tech will be useful both for wars as well as for the disaster recovery efforts after your federal funding is cut down for boycotting the wars.

spacebanana7•6mo ago

Isn't that a good thing? or at least not bad?

Having a transparent battlefield doesn't necessitate an increase or decrease in casualties.

runsWphotons•6mo ago

If you have it and the enemy doesn't you almost certainly will win. If both of you have it, casualties probably go up.

spacebanana7•6mo ago

Why would casualties necessarily go up with surveillance? Every argument for precision targeting can be reversed for evasion.

In Ukraine it’s relatively rare for large numbers of troops to be concentrated, because each side knows its opponents would observe the formation and make it a priority target. This makes something like the battle of the Somme unlikely to be repeated.

In call of duty do casualties go up when both sides have UAVs, compared to when both are without?

Larrikin•6mo ago

>In call of duty do casualties go up when both sides have UAVs, compared to when both are without?

Are there any other games updating their play style to recognize the heavy use of drones in war now?

iammjm•6mo ago

Arma Reforger has very good mods depicting drone combat like flying fpvs and bomber drones. Bohemia interactive simulations also focuses on drones in their newest warsim release

tamimio•6mo ago

As someone who's in the field, I hate how drones and robotics are now associated with anything related to wars. It just kills the passion, and now whenever you mention you work in it, do it, or are interested in it, you get that suspicious look and even a knock on your door.

drcode•6mo ago

Unless you do drones only on your private property, they are inherently a creepy, invasive technology (even though I think they're super cool and like playing with them, too)

hazmazlaz•6mo ago

Do you think that airplanes, helicopters, and balloons are also inherently a creepy, invasive technology as well? Because from the perspective of capturing imaging data from the air there is really no functional difference between those and UAS...

Mountain_Skies•6mo ago

Also can detect unapproved changes to your home or anything an insurance company believes makes your property more risky to insure.

Oceoss•6mo ago

I always thought drones could be very veeery useful for fires as well (not only floods)

__rito__•6mo ago

Reminds me of a project [0] that we spun up in a few days in a hackathon. We finetuned CLIP to be able to work with satellite imagery. Inference was extremely fast.

[0]: https://github.com/arampacha/CLIP-rsicd

OpenCiv3: Open-source, cross-platform reimagining of Civilization III

The Waymo World Model

How we made geo joins 400× faster with H3 indexes

Show HN: Look Ma, No Linux: Shell, App Installer, Vi, Cc on ESP32-S3 / BreezyBox

Monty: A minimal, secure Python interpreter written in Rust for use by AI

Show HN: I spent 4 years building a UI design tool with only the features I use

Dark Alley Mathematics

Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused library OS

Show HN: If you lose your memory, how to regain access to your computer?

Sheldon Brown's Bicycle Technical Info

Hackers (1995) Animated Experience

Unseen Footage of Atari Battlezone Arcade Cabinet Production

An Update on Heroku

PC Floppy Copy Protection: Vault Prolok

Delimited Continuations vs. Lwt for Threads

Show HN: ARM64 Android Dev Kit

Why I Joined OpenAI

How to effectively write quality code with AI

Show HN: R3forth, a ColorForth-inspired language with a tiny VM

Introducing the Developer Knowledge API and MCP Server

Female Asian Elephant Calf Born at the Smithsonian National Zoo

I spent 5 years in DevOps – Solutions engineering gave me what I was missing

Learning from context is harder than we thought

Understanding Neural Network, Visually

I now assume that all ads on Apple news are scams

FORTH? Really!?

Evaluating and mitigating the growing risk of LLM-discovered 0-days

WebView performance significantly slower than PWA

I'm going to cure my girlfriend's brain tumor

Show HN: Smooth CLI – Token-efficient browser for AI agents

OpenCiv3: Open-source, cross-platform reimagining of Civilization III

The Waymo World Model

How we made geo joins 400× faster with H3 indexes

Show HN: Look Ma, No Linux: Shell, App Installer, Vi, Cc on ESP32-S3 / BreezyBox

Monty: A minimal, secure Python interpreter written in Rust for use by AI

Show HN: I spent 4 years building a UI design tool with only the features I use

Dark Alley Mathematics

Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused library OS

Show HN: If you lose your memory, how to regain access to your computer?

Sheldon Brown's Bicycle Technical Info

Hackers (1995) Animated Experience

Unseen Footage of Atari Battlezone Arcade Cabinet Production

An Update on Heroku

PC Floppy Copy Protection: Vault Prolok

Delimited Continuations vs. Lwt for Threads

Show HN: ARM64 Android Dev Kit

Why I Joined OpenAI

How to effectively write quality code with AI

Show HN: R3forth, a ColorForth-inspired language with a tiny VM

Introducing the Developer Knowledge API and MCP Server

Female Asian Elephant Calf Born at the Smithsonian National Zoo

I spent 5 years in DevOps – Solutions engineering gave me what I was missing

Learning from context is harder than we thought

Understanding Neural Network, Visually

I now assume that all ads on Apple news are scams

FORTH? Really!?

Evaluating and mitigating the growing risk of LLM-discovered 0-days

WebView performance significantly slower than PWA

I'm going to cure my girlfriend's brain tumor

Show HN: Smooth CLI – Token-efficient browser for AI agents

Using drone imagery and AI to rapidly assess damage after hurricanes and floods

Comments