but no con can endure forever

* Meeting notes which was read accurately from a handwritten note (impressive!) but the summary hallucinated information that was completely made up. * Running omplex pytorch benchmarks while getting the simple parts of it completely wrong. We're talking getting variants of y=f(wx+b), which is what was being compared. All the graphs and visualizations look very convincing, but the details of what's tested completely bonkers.

Is there a petition to bring o3 back? Please? At least it was obvious when it failed.

Then ‘roll back’ to the real version - but only for paid users.

Imagine how much worse it’d have gone if they called it GPT-4o lite and gave that to free users only and kept 4o for paid only.

Maybe it will make more people subscribe?

But it will make people cancel their subs too - I miss o3

The limitations of what was believed to be by many as a path to AGI/ASI are becoming more clearly apparent.

Difficult to say how much room for improvement there is, or to have a definite answer regarding the usefulness and economic impact of those models, but what we're seeing now is not exponential improvement.

This is not going to rewrite and improve itself, or to cure cancer, unify physics or any kind of scientific or technological breakthrough.

For coders is is merely a dispensable QoL improvement.

This is the natural progression of mass market business where cost savings is valued and quality is not. If you as a customer want a higher quality product, you are left to the edges of the market of boutique, bespoke, upscale experiences which are only able to be offered at high quality because their scale is small and more manageable in all metrics and their existence against the walmarts of their industry is dependent on being at a higher quality offering.