Jetzt = now [1]
German adjective suffix: -ig [2] The German suffix -ig attaches to nouns, verbs and even adverbs. Given this flexibility, it ranks among the most common adjective endings in German. You can use -ig words to express that something is a certain way or happens a certain way. traurig: sad, sadly wässrig: watery knackig: crunchy, crispy abhängig: dependent, addicted geizig: stingy
[1] https://de.pons.com/übersetzung-2/deutsch-englisch/jetzt [2] https://www.lingoda.com/blog/en/german-adjective-suffixes/
I don't know why modern web frameworks insist on continuing to misuse or misapply the term despite a fairly large amount of messaging recently about how exactly this term is misapplied, and the resurgence of frameworks and tools that do correctly apply it, e.g. HTMX, Datastar, Alpine AJAX.
Otherwise, this looks cool. I'd encourage you to un-roll-your-own docs and use something like Starlight or Docusaurus so you can have usable search and versioned docs.
Wikipedia RESTful article says:
> The formal REST constraints are as follows:[10]
> Client/Server – Clients are separated from servers by a well-defined interface
> Stateless – A specific client does not consume server storage when the client is "at rest"
> Cache – Responses indicate their own cacheability
> Uniform interface
> Layered system – A client cannot ordinarily tell whether it is connected directly to the end server, or to an intermediary along the way
>An application that adheres to the REST architectural constraints may be informally described as RESTful, although this term is more commonly associated with the design of HTTP-based APIs and what are widely considered best practices regarding the "verbs" (HTTP methods) a resource responds to, while having little to do with REST as originally formulated—and is often even at odds with the concept.
Kinda makes me disappointed in the authors especially when they link to the REST wikipedia page as if they know what it means.
usually I do this with codegen, pretty cool if zig's type system is this powerful
Also holy crap: for (cat.homes
This is like django!
From that experience, I think this competes with go based web apps mostly. And if so, it makes a good chance at becomming succesful. Zig seams to have a better type system. Additionally the quality of documentation for this project is pretty good. That is something the go ecosystem seems to be lacking in general. The rest of the go perks are there as well. Single binary etc.
Now the ecosystem needs to catch up. Nice!
heldrida•4mo ago
Screencast #1 - Introduction https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeaO_MwfUII