Ideally I never get it, but if I do get I hope it's in like my late 90's, or even better by the time I get it they already have a cure, though the fact this might not work for humans makes me a little sad.
the whole western field is 15-20 years behind because some researcher lied about plaque data and everyone spent all their time chasing the lead. I think you’ll see useful therapies in 15-20 years from the west, maybe sooner if all the some ai hype pans out.
or the Chinese thing turns out to work! can’t tell myself. there’s probably an American who will try it at some point and publish a case study. Very tough to judge Chinese papers..
here’s an overview: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12121576/
(Or was that the joke?)
man that's a lifetime for this drug's trials.
A bit socialisation of health care for some but the benefits to the economy may well be worth the trade alone, never mind the individual benefits
[0] https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/blog/how-much-does-dementia-ca...
jader201•3h ago
> The mice had previously shown signs of cognitive decline, but after all three doses, the animals performed on par with their healthy peers in spatial learning and memory tasks. The benefits lasted at least six months.
1. This is great news… for mice with Alzheimer’s that don’t mind treatments every 6 months.
2. It’s crazy to think about something like this actually curing Alzheimer’s in humans, even if for just 6 months. Even more so if repeated doses have the same effects.
3. As with all of these studies, mice != humans, but it’s nice to have hope.
Side note: the temporary part of #2 makes me think about The Last Days of Ptolemy Grey [1]. It’s hard to fathom having a relative “come back” like that for a short time. Or even permanently.
[1] https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13820498
nharada•3h ago
copperx•3h ago
I wouldn't mind 10x a day injections if it keeps Alzheimer's at bay. Actually, I wouldn't mind a continuous IV drip.
bitmasher9•3h ago
vasco•1h ago
dmurray•30m ago
londons_explore•13m ago
trhway•24m ago
There seems to be a much better way:
https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2025/small-amounts-of-moderate-...
"The researchers found that engaging in as little as 35 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity per week, compared to zero minutes per week, was associated with a 41% lower risk of developing dementia over an average four-year follow-up period. Even for frail older adults—those at elevated risk of adverse health outcomes—greater activity was associated with lower dementia risks.
The researchers found dementia risk decreased with higher amounts of physical activity. Dementia risks were 60% lower in participants in the 35 to 69.9 minutes of physical activity/week category; 63% lower in the 70 to 139.9 minutes/week category; and 69% lower in the 140 and over minutes/week category."
jader201•2h ago
1. There aren’t serious side effects that make it more of a tradeoff
2. The price isn’t on the order of 6-7 figures (or possibly less for some)
don_neufeld•1h ago
And yes - I mean I would do that every 6 months.
I’m curious: Do you have any idea what care for such situations costs today?
jader201•51m ago
But my point isn’t so much about willingness to pay for such a treatment, but ability to pay for such a treatment.
My understanding is that some treatments like this are sometimes not covered by insurance, so only high income individuals are able to afford them.
On the other hand, long-term care often is covered by insurance, and the insurance is more affordable.
whycome•3h ago
jpollock•3h ago
harry8•2h ago
But they could give consent in advance.
If this horrific disease progresses to the point where ... I give my consent for ... Subject to final approval from family member/doctor/whatever.
arijun•2h ago
jpollock•25m ago
These are untested treatments with unknown impacts. Consider playing Russian roulette with the patient. The risk isn't the same but the outcomes have the same range. From nothing to death.
Someone•1h ago
There is plenty of data that shows that people are bad judges of their future opinions. “If X happened to me, I wouldn’t want to live anymore” often turns out to not be true.
That makes it questionably whether consent years or even months ago implies consent now.
And yes, that is very problematic in cases such as Alzheimer’s where people cannot consent now.
lostlogin•37m ago
Suppafly•17m ago
That's not really an obstacle, people in those situations have family members consent for all sorts of treatment already.
wahnfrieden•3h ago
qwertytyyuu•3h ago
adastra22•1h ago
Dylan16807•1h ago
I'd say that depends on how effective something is. If a treatment makes significant changes to most of the patients, you can have sufficient effectiveness proof before you're halfway done with the phase 1 safety trial.
jryb•3h ago
adastra22•1h ago
bbarnett•43m ago
Or scam artists putting sawdust from a "special tree" into a bottle, and saying it cured his aunt, so it will cure you! If you look at the history of such things, it's just a constant battle against people being fleeced out of money.
Con artists (and some of these wear lab coats and are quite professional in appearance and speak) know that desperation means easy prey. It's disgusting, but there it is.
And it wasn't just a little problem. It was a huge problem. If the legal framework we have in place was torn down, you'd see all that re-emerge in a second.
I agree that there should indeed be a way to balance snail oil salesman techniques, with the choice of someone in a dire circumstance. I did once read that there are FDA approved methods to get in on early stage/pre-clinical trials. These are targeted for people with severe conditions. People aren't being heartless here.
But at the same time, loved ones will litigate to get money back from scam artists. This also includes going after doctors or facilities or anyone willing to enable such actions. And if treatments go sideways, and no one validated that it was anything more than made up gibberish? The lawsuits will fly then, too. The cops may follow.
And it should be this way
Truth is, you are free to imbibe and consume anything you want. No one can really stop you. And whatever method is being used here, I'm sure you could replicate it, buy the hardware, and so on. You are free to do this.
It's just that no one wants to help.
So you are free.
samus•40m ago
adastra22•1h ago
bbarnett•51m ago
dmurray•32m ago