Nowadays it looks like yolo absolutely dominates this segment. Any data scientists can chime in?
I think people have continued to work on it. There’s no single lab or developer, it mostly appears that the metrics for comparison are usually focused on the speed/MAP plane.
One nice thing is that even with modest hardware, it’s low enough latency to process video in real time.
But the exciting new research is moving beyond the narrow task of segmentation. It's not just about having new models that get better scores but building larger multimodal systems, broader task definitions etc.
I gave mxnet a bit of an outsized score in hindsight, but outside of that I think I got things mostly right.
Have anyone else had similiar experiences?
Just goes to show that even when you’ve got everything going for you, perfect team filled with nice people, infinite resources (TPUs anyone?), perfect marketing, your own people will split off and take over the market.
Second place seems to always win the market
CaptainOfCoit•3mo ago
Seems they were pretty spot on! https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=pytorch,...
But to be fair, it was kind of obvious around ~2023 without having to look at metrics/data, you just had to look at what the researchers publishing novel research used.
Any similar articles that are a bit more up to date, maybe even for 2025?
Legend2440•3mo ago
Unless you’re working at Google, then maybe you use JAX.
mattnewton•3mo ago
jonas21•3mo ago
I think the only thing that could have saved TensorFlow at that point would have been some sort of enormous performance boost that would only work with their computation model. I'm assuming Google's plan was make it easy to run the same TensorFlow code on GPUs and TPUs, and then swoop in with TPUs that massively outperformed GPUs (at least on a performance per dollar basis). But that never really happened.