frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Yann LeCun to depart Meta and launch AI startup focused on 'world models'

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/metas-chief-ai-scientist-yann-lecun-depart-and-launch-ai-start-fo...
365•MindBreaker2605•5h ago•240 comments

Please donate to keep Network Time Protocol up – Goal 1k

https://www.ntp.org/
120•gastonmorixe•4h ago•62 comments

Yt-dlp: External JavaScript runtime now required for full YouTube support

https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/15012
35•bertman•2h ago•4 comments

What happened to Transmeta, the last big dotcom IPO

https://dfarq.homeip.net/what-happened-to-transmeta-the-last-big-dotcom-ipo/
41•onename•3h ago•19 comments

Pakistani newspaper mistakenly prints AI prompt with the article

https://twitter.com/omar_quraishi/status/1988518627859951986
68•wg0•1h ago•11 comments

Simulating a Planet on the GPU: Part 1 (2022)

https://www.patrickcelentano.com/blog/planet-sim-part-1
71•Doches•5h ago•9 comments

X5.1 solar flare, G4 geomagnetic storm watch

https://www.spaceweatherlive.com/en/news/view/593/20251111-x5-1-solar-flare-g4-geomagnetic-storm-...
346•sva_•15h ago•95 comments

Laptops with Stickers

https://stickertop.art/main/
457•z303•1w ago•436 comments

I didn't reverse-engineer the protocol for my blood pressure monitor in 24 hours

https://james.belchamber.com/articles/blood-pressure-monitor-reverse-engineering/
257•jamesbelchamber•15h ago•91 comments

.NET 10

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/announcing-dotnet-10/
274•runesoerensen•20h ago•146 comments

Bluetooth 6.2 – more responsive, improves security, USB comms, and testing

https://www.cnx-software.com/2025/11/05/bluetooth-6-2-gets-more-responsive-improves-security-usb-...
136•zdw•6d ago•88 comments

Four strange places to see London's Roman Wall

https://diamondgeezer.blogspot.com/2025/11/odd-places-to-see-londons-roman-wall.html
191•zeristor•14h ago•58 comments

.NET MAUI is coming to Linux and the browser

https://avaloniaui.net/blog/net-maui-is-coming-to-linux-and-the-browser-powered-by-avalonia
230•vyrotek•13h ago•197 comments

Perkeep – Personal storage system for life

https://perkeep.org/
224•nikolay•9h ago•48 comments

You will own nothing and be (un)happy

https://racc.blog/you-will-own-nothing-and-be-unhappy/
164•showthemfangs•6h ago•128 comments

The terminal of the future

https://jyn.dev/the-terminal-of-the-future
240•miguelraz•16h ago•111 comments

Show HN: Hotkey → Screenshot → AI Help. Works in Every App

https://github.com/thisisharsh7/seeva-ai-assistant
4•thisisharsh7•1h ago•0 comments

Using Street Lamps as EV Chargers

https://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/54104-using-street-lamps-as-ev-chargers
14•rbanffy•1w ago•10 comments

Why Nietzsche matters in the age of artificial intelligence

https://cacm.acm.org/blogcacm/why-nietzsche-matters-in-the-age-of-artificial-intelligence/
126•pseudolus•12h ago•76 comments

Stochastic computing

https://scottlocklin.wordpress.com/2025/10/31/stochastic-computing/
21•emmelaich•1w ago•3 comments

Pikaday: A friendly guide to front-end date pickers

https://pikaday.dbushell.com
233•mnemonet•21h ago•103 comments

The history of Casio watches

https://www.casio.com/us/watches/50th/Heritage/1970s/
258•qainsights•3d ago•131 comments

A modern 35mm film scanner for home

https://www.soke.engineering/
211•QiuChuck•16h ago•168 comments

The Department of War just shot the accountants and opted for speed

https://steveblank.com/2025/11/11/the-department-of-war-just-shot-the-accountants-and-opted-for-s...
208•ridruejo•22h ago•337 comments

FFmpeg to Google: Fund us or stop sending bugs

https://thenewstack.io/ffmpeg-to-google-fund-us-or-stop-sending-bugs/
940•CrankyBear•18h ago•689 comments

Ask HN: How does one stay motivated to grind through LeetCode?

7•blutoot•1h ago•2 comments

My fan worked fine, so I gave it WiFi

https://ellis.codes/blog/my-fan-worked-fine-so-i-gave-it-wi-fi/
180•woolywonder•6d ago•65 comments

Heroku Support for .NET 10

https://www.heroku.com/blog/support-for-dotnet-10-lts-what-developers-need-know/
87•runesoerensen•14h ago•30 comments

We ran over 600 image generations to compare AI image models

https://latenitesoft.com/blog/evaluating-frontier-ai-image-generation-models/
169•kalleboo•19h ago•90 comments

Scaling HNSWs

https://antirez.com/news/156
193•cyndunlop•22h ago•42 comments
Open in hackernews

Please donate to keep Network Time Protocol up – Goal 1k

https://www.ntp.org/
120•gastonmorixe•4h ago

Comments

mhovd•1h ago
I am surprised that NTP project is not funded, fully or partially, by larger organizations or governments, given the criticality of the project.
philipwhiuk•1h ago
Why is research into the protocol useful. Isn't it done?
junon•1h ago
Time is hard, time synchronization is arguably harder.
saikia81•1h ago
The project isn't about research it's about creating a reference implementation
philipwhiuk•25m ago
> The NTP Project conducts Research and Development in NTP, a protocol designed to synchronize the clocks of computers over a network to a common timebase.

Research is put front and centre in their pitch for funding.

willis936•16m ago
What's the distinction from NIST's internet time service?
iamkonstantin•37m ago
We keep coming up with new ways to use it: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240011919
arccy•1h ago
It's not really clear why they need this money either?
simoncion•1h ago
> It's not really clear why they need this money either?

Really? The sentence at the top of the Donate page seems pretty clear to me:

> Your donation helps Network Time Foundation maintain the NTP website and provide resources and support to NTP developers.

Is it unclear to you?

tdeck•1h ago
It is kind of vague IMO. Especially since most of the actual NTP infrastructure is run by governments, universities, and companies.

https://gist.github.com/mutin-sa/eea1c396b1e610a2da1e5550d94...

But..it's $1k. This is basically pocket change on an institutional level. I've been part of some very scrappy and poorly funded community organizations and even they took in more than $1k every year. Even if you don't believe NTP maintainers should be paid anything for their work (an opinion I don't hold), it's trivial to spend this amount on modest everyday expenses like renting a venue a couple of times, buying insurance, and paying for hosting and technical resources.

EDIT: Here is their 2024 tax return

https://www.nwtime.org/about/documents/2024_NTF_IRS_990.pdf

It looks like they took in more than $200k and spent $100k on "contract services" (I can't tell what that means) and somewhat modest amounts on other things. Unfortunately I need to exit the rabbit hole now.

simoncion•51m ago
> It is kind of vague IMO.

How much more clear can they reasonably be?

It seems a big waste of effort to maintain -say- a damnable Trello board with upcoming priorities and roadmaps <strike>and Kickstarter stretch goals</strike> when their bug tracker and mailing list are visible to the public. (Though, it seems that they've put the list behind some broken moderation software, so you have to go to -say- the IETF's archive of the thing to read it. "AI" crawlers ruin everything.)

EDIT: Do note that that tax return you found is for the Network Time Foundation, not the NTP Project. I don't know if the two are separate entities for tax purposes, but do note that the NTF supports several projects, of which the NTP Project is one. The NTP Project is just for NTP.

bawolff•35m ago
We're talking about $1000. In context i would assume its their hosting bill.

I can't imagine its much more than that if we are talking about such a small sum.

arccy•24m ago
a website doesn't need $1000

and $1000 seems at the same time to be quite a bit of money, but also too little to be for funding people long term.

GuB-42•7m ago
It doesn't explain why they need the money "we need the money to continue doing what we are doing" means nothing unless they also explain what they are doing and why it matters.

Thankfully, that's also on the front page:

What they are doing:

> The NTP Project produces an open source Reference Implementation of the NTP standard, maintains the implementation Documentation, and develops the protocol and algorithmic standard that is used to communicate time between systems

And why it matters:

> NTP is what ensures the reliability of billions of devices around the world, under the sea, and even in space

Now, it doesn't explain why a reference implementation is a good thing, but I think that at this point, you have a good enough idea to decide if you want to donate or not.

Edit: However, $1000 seems too low to matter. It may not even pay for the expense of the fundraising itself. I think it is more of an awareness campaign: "look at the protocol we all use, you would think we are talking many millions of dollars, but the truth is, you are off by orders of magnitude"

simoncion•1h ago
The Network Time Foundation (which counts the NTP project among those it provides resources to) lists several corporate Members.

But yeah, critical infrastructure usually goes criminally underfunded.

littlestymaar•43m ago
Large tech companies and free-riding critical internet commons, name a better duo.
xigoi•30m ago
https://xkcd.com/2347/
nickelpro•19m ago
The reference implementation, while historically important, has largely been displaced by more secure/performant implementations (ntpsec, chrony), or by in-house implementations (Amazon, Google).

Notably NTPd doesn't support leap-smear, which means those who absolutely must have monotonic time can't use it at all.

mananaysiempre•13m ago
> Those who absolutely must have monotonic time

... shouldn’t be using a Unix timestamp, or anything else that’s not a count of SI seconds elapsed since a fixed reference point, to begin with.

jchw•1h ago
I tried to donate, but apparently I am not human:

> 1 error prohibited this submission from being saved:

> Looks like you are not a human

Good to know.

autoexec•1h ago
I'm not sure why they'd try so hard to keep bots from paying them anyway. If someone wants to write a bot that constantly pays me good money I'm fine with that. I might rate limit it if the stream of payments coming in can't cover the cost of keeping the server from being DoS'd, but that's not going to inconvenience a human trying to submit a payment one time.
bmacho•1h ago
[deleted]
mjhay•57m ago
Is there a problem with fraudsters donating to OSS projects?
dietr1ch•57m ago
Well fraudsters need to have their time in sync for their business right? Who are you to deny their donations?
johnisgood•55m ago
Money is money.

How do you know the cash you are using is not "blood money"? Come on.

op7•56m ago
Then when too many of the fradulent payments get charged back then your payment processor drops you
michaelt•46m ago
Sure, chargebacks cost money.

You know what else costs money? When someone wants to give you money, and you misidentify them as a bot and refuse their money.

Akronymus•35m ago
With donations being blocked you keep sitting at 0, with chargebacks you can actually go negative, in a potentially unbounded way.
zinekeller•10m ago
I really hope that the sole reason that michaelt concluded this is simply due on not having any experience how to manage credit card payments (on merchant's side).

For those who does not handle these things: I am not sure on what processor Network Time Foundation is using, but Stripe's $15 fee is actually on the low side of chargebacks (some processors even use the fixed fee + percentage model). Worse, this is unconditional: if you somehow won this, you won't get the chargeback fee.

bawolff•34m ago
Yeah, but one probably costs more money then the other, and it seems plausible its the chargebacks.
JimDabell•48m ago
If you have small payments that can be made by bots easily, then your service can be used by thieves as an oracle to determine which of their stolen credit card numbers still work. Then you get lots of chargebacks to deal with.
slv77•44m ago
Bots use sites like this to validate lists of stolen cards with low dollar donations to validate the cards before using them on the target site. Without some one of protection sites like these are quickly flooded with fraudulent transactions and then fined and shut down by Visa and Mastercard.
lapsis_beeftech•32m ago
This sounds like a problem where cryptocurrency could actually be the solution. Next time I want to make a charitable donation I will ask for an XMR address to preserve my privacy and work around commercial payment processor issues.
jacquesm•2m ago
That's because the bots will use such services to 'taste' cards to see if they work. Then if they do the criminals can resell them for a higher value than for which they bought them for.
landgenoot•40m ago
You are thinking to much in emoji's and emdashes.
fghorow•40m ago
Yeah, I'm not a human either.

(Edited to add: that was from Safari. Chrome worked. YMMV.)

bheadmaster•1h ago
It's sad that a project that literally every company in the world depends on is requiring donations to keep working.
mapt•4m ago
I feel like a ~$10M/yr foundation to fund all of the "Some Guy In Nebraska" people (https://xkcd.com/2347/) on a modest stipend would be easily worthwhile for any one of the tech giants, even understanding the free rider effect. Some of their thousands of engineers are being paid high six or seven figures, and every single minute of their time spent figuring out how some dependency has changed and broken compatibility adds up very quickly.
seb1204•1h ago
Why not just turn it off and say we need money to turn it in again?
ramon156•1h ago
Turn what off?
theblazehen•1h ago
pool.ntp.org dns resolution and any servers that they control, presumably
rnijveld•9m ago
The ntp pool is actually independently run and funded and has nothing to do with the NTPd implementation nor the NTP Foundation, other than them allowing the pool to use that DNS name.
bilekas•1h ago
Time itself maybe, I know I could use with a little bit of a pause.
baq•1h ago
Return to the basement now. No escape.
onion2k•58m ago
That might work, but the second order effect would probably be companies trying to do the work of time synchronisation themselves in case it happened again. That would lead to fragmentation and incompatibility.
tomashubelbauer•1h ago
I wish when accepting donations, websites would stop caching the total collected amount or give it a super short TTL. I like to see the little progress bar get closer to the goal thanks to my couple of bucks.
pigbearpig•49m ago
Perhaps they don't have the funds to implement that feature.
dspillett•25m ago
If they are only counting fully cleared funds, your payment might not be relevant yet. Some fraud checks are not synchronous, for instance.

Though they could fake it: take the current cleared total and add your amount for your display.

47282847•1h ago
Confusing. On https://www.nwtime.org/ they use $11,000 as “November 2025 goal“, with $4,675 as current level?

Are these goals monthly goals, with the counter being reset? The sites don’t make that clear.

dependency_2x•1h ago
https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/dependency_2x.png
lifestyleguru•59m ago
There are always money and resources in ad tech.
clbrmbr•1h ago
The folks who run the public NTP pool really ought not to make it easier to pay them money to use it commercially.

I submitted a request for commercial use via their online form but never received a response.

Theodores•50m ago
So we have NTP begging to raise a grand yet we have hundreds of billions being spent on AI data centers.

NTP might not be able to generate AI cat videos full of hallucinations but it is a vital part of web infrastructure. The same can't be said about today's mega projects.

iberator•47m ago
PTP is way better than NTP, but it might be possible that reference time is somehow taken from NTP anyway.

What I Mean:

Reference .gov atomic clock (not radium one) -> NTP -> ? -> ? -> satellite control station -> gps -> PTP

Hahaha

great_wubwub•41m ago
PTP is more precise so it's much harder to synchronize over long distances. Even in data centers it benefits from hop-by-hop participation from the routers involved.
jhellan•27m ago
This is true when all network delays between the synchronized device and the time reference are deterministic and accounted for in the configuration. The design of PTP assumes that this is the case. NTP, on the other hand, estimates the network delays to its time references.

Is there any reason to believe that PTP would be better in normal networks?

imglorp•37m ago
The project has been hungry for years.

There was a fork to clean up and secure the implementation: https://ntpsec.org and ideally they would combine forces.

Summarized here: https://lwn.net/Articles/713901

sathackr•18m ago
That seems very low for such a high profile site/project

I donated an amount but the bar didn't move and is at the same level($395) as before my donation

sathackr•15m ago
If you follow the "Foundations work" link at the bottom, you're taken to another page that shows $4,675 of $11,000 November goal.
sathackr•13m ago
Looks like the first $1000 goal is specifically for maintaining to he NTP website and maybe developers? While the other is a broader goal for the foundation
jacquesm•4m ago
They should just switch it off for a day or two, I don't think they'll have trouble getting funding after that.