frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

We Uncovered a Race Condition in Aurora RDS

https://hightouch.com/blog/uncovering-a-race-condition-in-aurora-rds
76•theanomaly•52m ago•14 comments

AI World Clocks

https://clocks.brianmoore.com/
58•waxpancake•37m ago•20 comments

Manganese is Lyme disease's double-edge sword

https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2025/11/manganese-is-lyme-diseases-double-edge-sword
50•gmays•2h ago•5 comments

Moving Back to a Tiling WM – XMonad

https://wssite.vercel.app/blog/moving-back-to-a-tiling-wm-xmonad
45•weirdsmiley•2h ago•38 comments

Not even a month passed and Chat Control is back in the EU

https://reclaimthenet.org/the-disguised-return-of-the-eus-private-message-scanning-plot
135•egorfine•1h ago•49 comments

Bitchat for Gaza – messaging without internet

https://updates.techforpalestine.org/bitchat-for-gaza-messaging-without-internet/
90•ciconia•1h ago•18 comments

Minisforum Stuffs Entire Arm Homelab in the MS-R1

https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2025/minisforum-stuffs-entire-arm-homelab-ms-r1
9•kencausey•29m ago•2 comments

Meeting notes between Forgejo and the Dutch government via Git commits

https://codeberg.org/forgejo/sustainability/pulls/137/files
61•speckx•1h ago•13 comments

AGI fantasy is a blocker to actual engineering

https://www.tomwphillips.co.uk/2025/11/agi-fantasy-is-a-blocker-to-actual-engineering/
418•tomwphillips•5h ago•380 comments

RetailReady (YC W24) Is Hiring

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/retailready/jobs/kGHAith-support-engineer
1•sarah74•2h ago

Incus-OS: Immutable Linux OS to run Incus as a hypervisor

https://linuxcontainers.org/incus-os/
102•_kb•1w ago•32 comments

Linear Algebra Explains Why Some Words Are Effectively Untranslatable

https://aethermug.com/posts/linear-algebra-explains-why-some-words-are-effectively-untranslatable
64•mrcgnc•4h ago•31 comments

Germany to Ban Huawei from Future 6G Network in Sovereignty Push

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-11-13/germany-to-ban-huawei-from-future-6g-network-i...
71•teleforce•1h ago•47 comments

Honda: 2 years of ml vs 1 month of prompting - heres what we learned

https://www.levs.fyi/blog/2-years-of-ml-vs-1-month-of-prompting/
232•Ostatnigrosh•4d ago•86 comments

US Tech Market Treemap

https://caplocus.com/
25•gwintrob•2h ago•5 comments

Magit manuals are available online again

https://github.com/magit/magit/issues/5472
90•vetronauta•7h ago•30 comments

Show HN: Dumbass Business Ideas

https://dumbassideas.com
8•elysionmind•54m ago•2 comments

Awk Technical Notes

https://maximullaris.com/awk_tech_notes.html
12•signa11•1w ago•0 comments

EDE: Small and Fast Desktop Environment (2014)

https://edeproject.org/
76•bradley_taunt•6h ago•28 comments

I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla

https://manualdousuario.net/en/mozilla-firefox-window-ai/
980•rpgbr•5h ago•607 comments

'No One Lives Forever' Turns 25 and You Still Can't Buy It Legitimately

https://www.techdirt.com/2025/11/13/no-one-lives-forever-turns-25-you-still-cant-buy-it-legitimat...
81•speckx•2h ago•46 comments

Winamp clone in Swift for macOS

https://github.com/mgreenwood1001/winamp
109•hyperbole•6h ago•85 comments

Operating Margins

https://fi-le.net/margin/
225•fi-le•5d ago•84 comments

Secret Boat Strike Memo Justifies Kills by Claiming Targeting Drugs, Not People

https://theintercept.com/2025/11/14/boat-strikes-immunity-legality-trump/
36•Qem•56m ago•25 comments

Oracle hit hard in Wall Street's tech sell-off over its AI bet

https://www.ft.com/content/583e9391-bdd0-433e-91e0-b1b93038d51e
162•1vuio0pswjnm7•4h ago•129 comments

Scientists Produce Powerhouse Pigment Behind Octopus Camouflage

https://today.ucsd.edu/story/scientists-produce-powerhouse-pigment-behind-octopus-camouflage
55•gmays•4d ago•4 comments

You misunderstand what it means to be poor

https://blog.ctms.me/posts/2025-11-14-being-poor-or-being-broke/
246•speckx•2h ago•263 comments

Nvidia is gearing up to sell servers instead of just GPUs and components

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/jp-morgan-says-nvidia-is-geari...
132•giuliomagnifico•5h ago•60 comments

RegreSQL: Regression Testing for PostgreSQL Queries

https://boringsql.com/posts/regresql-testing-queries/
132•radimm•12h ago•31 comments

Cgp-serde: A modular serialization library for Serde powered by CGP

https://contextgeneric.dev/blog/cgp-serde-release/
11•maybevoid•1w ago•2 comments
Open in hackernews

Germany to Ban Huawei from Future 6G Network in Sovereignty Push

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-11-13/germany-to-ban-huawei-from-future-6g-network-in-sovereignty-push
70•teleforce•1h ago

Comments

jusonce56789•1h ago
Well, people will buy Huawei routers at home anyway.
wnevets•1h ago
Is that commonplace in Germany?
mschuster91•1h ago
Sadly yes, cheap crap tends to be Huawei. Everyone with a modicum of technical understanding goes for a Fritzbox though.
looofooo0•1h ago
I do Openwrt on my HP
hopelite•42m ago
I’m not familiar with the Huawei matter because it’s similar not something I have to concern myself with, but can you point to something specific or a place where I could get some facts on why Huawei is justifiably frowned upon?

I have never seen anything but the various broad claims in the news and by politicians that seem to always just kind of come down to “China bad” as evidence. Maybe I just didn’t care enough to notice, but I would have thought that if there was something real to how Huawei hardware will make the sky fall, the powers that be would have surely made that case with clear and irrefutable proof.

Thanks for providing anything you might be able to point me towards that goes beyond “China bad”, regardless of how anyone feels about China.

mschuster91•5m ago
> I’m not familiar with the Huawei matter because it’s similar not something I have to concern myself with, but can you point to something specific or a place where I could get some facts on why Huawei is justifiably frowned upon?

Try to use their routers as someone with needs greater than "get into the internet". Their UI is horribly slow and clunky, you'll need to reboot them every few months because something hangs itself and about every year or two they manage to get 0wned by a wormable exploit. On top of that, analyses have shown their firmware to be utterly rancid [1], although I do admit that this analysis is six years old.

> Maybe I just didn’t care enough to notice, but I would have thought that if there was something real to how Huawei hardware will make the sky fall, the powers that be would have surely made that case with clear and irrefutable proof.

The thing Western politicians are afraid of is running into another scenario like in the early days of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, where Viasat was hacked by the Russians leading to serious outages [2], or that the equipment - particularly anything with radios attached - can be "remote bricked" similar to how Israel detonated Hezbollah's pagers. It's bad enough we can't be sure that our own equipment is reasonably secure from cyber attacks, but Huawei is a complete blackbox. We need to prepare for a war scenario with China, either directly (the worst case), but at the very least as a side effect of an invasion of Taiwan. In either case I expect the CCP to behave like Mossad, cripple us piece by piece.

Even if the CCP never decides to invade Taiwan, it still makes sense to refuse their companies entry into our markets as long as our companies aren't welcome in theirs. I am a big friend of reciprocity and China hasn't given us much.

On top of that, Huawei was under fire for alleged sanctions violations and IP theft [3].

[1] https://www.securityweek.com/many-potential-backdoors-found-...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viasat_hack

[3] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/feb/13/huawei-ne...

juliusceasar•1h ago
Better late than never.

China has so many anti-Foreigner laws for doing business in China.

West has made China rich and powerful in exchange for cheap labour.

NoiseBert69•1h ago
I'd more say: they made clear rules if you want to play business in China.

Europe never set any boundaries. Honestly our fault.

lazyeye•1h ago
Our leaders in the West have been very naive. Also the Chinese "elite capture" program has been very effective.
croes•29m ago
You mean old we-don’t-care-bout-human-and-environmental-rights trick?

Let’s face it, nobody would care if China just would be a subordinate receiver of orders.

As soon they became a competitor there was a problem

jajuuka•18m ago
And that is the core contention for the anti-China rhetoric. That they are a competitor. There are a billion and one reasons people say they don't like China, but the core issue is competition.
tharne•8m ago
The only rule the Chinese play by is, "It's only immoral if you get caught".
coliveira•6m ago
I thought this law was invented by American business.
ta12653421•6m ago
Well, as European, i have to clearly state - unfortunately - this is only because of what happened in the 20th century: WWII. This "event" changed somehow the psychology, not allowing the EU to "stand up straight with our shoulders back".

Unfortunately. With around 500m customers, we could be powerful. But we arent: Stumbling upon our own feeds.

juliusceasar•6m ago
Now EU is making clear rules against China. EU should apply exactly the same laws against Chinese like Chinese do against foreigners.

China shouldn't complain, especially don't bitch about racism.

anonporridge•27m ago
The rise of China has done a lot to destroy the neoliberal, globalist dream.

Letting them cheat the globalist system (e.g. violating IP laws, human rights violations, Uyghur/Tibetan genocide) may have been fine when they were desperately poor, but there was always an implicit assumption that they would eventually start playing by the rules and culturally liberalize. But they're not. How can we hold onto ideals like "diversity is our strength" and open borders are good when China is kicking ass and threatening the balance of power as an insular ethnostate with one of the lowest rates of immigrants on the planet?

And now they're growing to a power level that threatens to rival the US and its authority to police this global system we've created. That isn't stable, and the west would be insane to not shut China out and take a step back from our open, globalist ideals until we sort out this geopolitical game of thrones.

jquery•6m ago
No, just no. I get where you’re coming from, but I disagree in the strongest terms that copying China is the way forward. Closed, centralized models can scale quickly, as China did, but open models generate more frontier innovation and resilience. Iirc, nearly half of our unicorns have immigrant founders.

Sure, let’s harden IP and other trade laws, and punish China for violations (start treating them as an adult, a nation peer, instead of a rowdy child). But giving up our strategic advantage because China was able to semi-copy-us without having that advantage would be a huge mistake imo. I’m not saying America doesn’t need major changes, but I don’t think the way forward is to close our borders to global talent. Instead, let’s take advantage of our superpower status to implement UHC and UBI, to make our nation even more attractive to talented immigrants.

avipars•1h ago
https://archive.li/18QJs
daneel_w•1h ago
Good. Don't forget their incredibly affordable and attractive smartphones and the fact that they have almost completely captured the market for cellular transceiver chips used in USB mobile modems, both of which are excellent products for espionage and weaponization just like their cellular network equipment.
RobotToaster•1h ago
And use American Cisco equipment with definitely no NSA backdoors instead?
RcouF1uZ4gsC•1h ago
That is called being on the other side of an airtight hatch (h/t Raymond Chen)

The US has troops, tanks, aircraft, even nuclear weapons stationed in German.

Sovereignty vis-a-vis the United States is not something on the table.

daneel_w•57m ago
It's an east vs west thing.
jiehong•1h ago
Which company will design and make 6G telco hardware in Germany?

I guess it will be 3/4/5G for a while, until they can someday cover the country just barely, and then 6G a decade and half later than everyone else (or is it by giving up sovereignty by buying US stuff instead?)

Sorry for being hopeless, but Germany has been very good at proving its inability to fix telco issues (or its train issues…).

sabjut•1h ago
Both Nokia (Finland) and Ericsson (Sweden) are great european alternatives. There is no need to reinvent the wheel in every EU country.
PeterStuer•56m ago
Both Nokia and Ericsson have substantial Blackrock and Vanguard investment.
nemomarx•19m ago
blackrock and vanguard do index funds, yeah? They have substantial investments in everything on the market that's doing well enough to get on indexes. I don't see how you can avoid that?
tonetegeatinst•1h ago
I know some open 5G hardware project exists as I read about it about a month ago.

However I wonder if that will remain true with 6G, or if it will even be affordable.

mannanj•1h ago
Why 6g? who asked for it? I am content with 4g, 5g was a push as it was.
daneel_w•58m ago
You and I are content with it, but these standards were never really about our individual and immediate experiences. It's about concurrent capacity for the growing grid as a whole.
PeterStuer•1h ago
They are not wrong, but will they also ban Cisco in their "Sovereignty Push"?
anonporridge•17m ago
Why should they?

The United States honors international IP law and doesn't cheat its way into threatening domestic production of other countries like China does.

tharne•10m ago
> Why should they?

Because bashing all things American while ignoring the threat posed by China is part of Europe's cultural DNA.

hiimkeks•8m ago
https://archive.is/tDC0W

https://archive.is/IQyBG

and this was before the US elected an overt fascist

coliveira•7m ago
> doesn't cheat its way into threatening domestic production of other countries

Can you still say this with a straight face with everything that is coming from Washington?

9cb14c1ec0•57m ago
Is 6G even a thing? From either a bandwidth demand perspective or a financial perspective? Every US wireless service just about bankrupted themselves rolling out 5G.
londons_explore•52m ago
Bandwidth demand is very much there...

My connection is 1.5 Gbits at 3am, but at peak time (7pm) I'm lucky to get 10 Mbits.

My network needs more capacity, and if 6G can offer it cheaper than building 5x more 5G masts, that's the route they'll have to take.

9cb14c1ec0•47m ago
I guess you must live in a much more heavily populated environment than I do. For myself, I'm still trying to figure out remote 5G IOT connectivity that doesn't require $1k in hardware. Non-consumer-grade 5G hardware is incredibly expensive still, which is why we are still deploying new 4G stuff.
Incipient•51m ago
I don't get why Huawei gets specific hate? Shouldn't this equally apply to all Chinese vendors? I wouldn't expect any are less susceptible to government control?
zweifuss•30m ago
ZTE is also under scrutiny. The reason it's only Huawei and ZTE is that other Chinese providers are so insignificant that the telecoms will likely be able to replace the infrastructure themselves with spares or consolidation. However, in an emergency, the government would have to foot the bill for replacing Huawei/ZTE systems quickly, as the telecoms couldn't finance this and lack of capacity would mean very high prices.
kwanbix•45m ago
Nice, in 2025, the world is a place where China can not be trusted, Russia can not be trusted, USA can not be trusted, Europe can not be trusted (at least from the point of the others), etc.

We are very far from the "imagine all the people, living live in peace". I wonder why that is...

fodmap•35m ago
On the other hand Spain is using Huawei servers for almost all of their sensitive data. I wonder how the UE, and NATO, will react to that, because they're using Huawei for Social Security data, wiretapping data (SITEL), or even Intelligence Services data.

https://therecord.media/spain-awards-contracts-huawei-intell...

tchalla•19m ago
> “We’ll discuss with industry what we can do, not only to make ourselves independent from China, but also for example independent from the USA, independent from the big tech companies,” Merz said.

Good to know it's not just China.

> Merz ruled out fully decoupling from China, which is Germany’s second-biggest trading partner. “We can’t do that,” he said. “China can’t do that, but we can do it even less.”

And even better to know that the move is practical and understands who has the upper hand.

V__•15m ago
At the same time they are exploring the use of Palantir and want to use more of Microsofts 365 cloud.

This is all just talk. Either there are very real security concerns or someone lobbied heavily.

coliveira•9m ago
> Good to know it's not just China.

If you believe this I have a bridge to sell you. They're using this to hide the real reason for the move, which is to do Washington's bid, just like a good colony does.

tchalla•5m ago
I won't be surprised if they do the Washington's bid. A few years ago, they wouldn't even consider it. By the time we all die, may be they will.