frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Why xor eax, eax?

https://xania.org/202512/01-xor-eax-eax
247•hasheddan•4h ago•87 comments

Ask HN: Who is hiring? (December 2025)

23•whoishiring•30m ago•31 comments

Cartographers Have Been Hiding Covert Illustrations Inside of Switzerland's Maps

https://eyeondesign.aiga.org/for-decades-cartographers-have-been-hiding-covert-illustrations-insi...
94•mhb•2h ago•16 comments

Search tool that only returns content created before ChatGPT's public release

https://tegabrain.com/Slop-Evader
678•dmitrygr•12h ago•263 comments

Self-hosting a Matrix server for 5 years

https://yaky.dev/2025-11-30-self-hosting-matrix/
162•the-anarchist•5h ago•63 comments

The Penicillin Myth

https://www.asimov.press/p/penicillin-myth
40•surprisetalk•2h ago•13 comments

WordPress plugin quirk resulted in UK Gov OBR Budget leak [pdf]

https://obr.uk/docs/dlm_uploads/01122025-Investigation-into-November-2025-EFO-publication-error.pdf
71•robtaylor•1h ago•57 comments

A vector graphics workstation from the 70s

https://justanotherelectronicsblog.com/?p=1429
46•ibobev•2h ago•4 comments

ImAnim: Modern animation capabilities to ImGui applications

https://github.com/soufianekhiat/ImAnim
6•klaussilveira•20m ago•1 comments

Historic Engineering Wonders: Photos That Reveal How They Pulled It Off

https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/engineering-methods-from-the-past/
46•dxs•6d ago•8 comments

Show HN: I built a 1.8MB native app with self-built UI, vision and AI libraries

https://github.com/Okery/Aivition
11•jaramy•34m ago•3 comments

Games using anti-cheats and their compatibility with GNU/Linux or Wine/Proton

https://areweanticheatyet.com/
172•doener•9h ago•217 comments

Netflix Kills Casting from Its Mobile App to Most Modern TVs

https://www.macrumors.com/2025/12/01/netflix-kills-casting-from-mobile-app-to-tvs/
78•Brajeshwar•1h ago•49 comments

Google *Unkills* JPEG XL?

https://tonisagrista.com/blog/2025/google-unkills-jpegxl/
7•speckx•1h ago•0 comments

It’s been a very hard year

https://bell.bz/its-been-a-very-hard-year/
252•surprisetalk•10h ago•309 comments

A Love Letter to FreeBSD

https://www.tara.sh/posts/2025/2025-11-25_freebsd_letter/
382•rbanffy•18h ago•242 comments

Detection of triboelectric discharges during dust events on Mars

https://gizmodo.com/weve-detected-lightning-on-mars-for-the-first-time-2000691996
83•domofutu•4d ago•45 comments

Writing a good Claude.md

https://www.humanlayer.dev/blog/writing-a-good-claude-md
641•objcts•22h ago•246 comments

Trifold is a tool to quickly and cheaply host static websites using a CDN

https://www.jpt.sh/projects/trifold/
70•birdculture•1w ago•23 comments

Google, Nvidia, and OpenAI – Stratechery by Ben Thompson

https://stratechery.com/2025/google-nvidia-and-openai/
7•tambourine_man•1h ago•1 comments

Advent of Sysadmin 2025

https://sadservers.com/advent
298•lazyant•15h ago•91 comments

Victorian-style lines for the web: Elements of identical width

https://jacobfilipp.com/victorian-line/
29•surprisetalk•1w ago•3 comments

SmartTube Compromised

https://www.aftvnews.com/smarttubes-official-apk-was-compromised-with-malware-what-you-should-do-...
126•akersten•11h ago•100 comments

How to Run Profitable Pricing Experiments?

https://cleancommit.io/blog/pricing-experiments/
12•mrkaluzny•5d ago•5 comments

Boring Laser Eyes Simulator: Add laser beams to your eyes with your webcam

6•frankhsu•1w ago•0 comments

X210Ai is a new motherboard to upgrade ThinkPad X201/200

https://www.tpart.net/about-x210ai/
147•walterbell•13h ago•61 comments

DeepSeekMath-V2: Towards Self-Verifiable Mathematical Reasoning

https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Math-V2
217•victorbuilds•7h ago•71 comments

Algorithms for Optimization [pdf]

https://algorithmsbook.com/optimization/files/optimization.pdf
320•Anon84•17h ago•28 comments

Advent of Code 2025

https://adventofcode.com/2025/about
1097•vismit2000•1d ago•357 comments

N-Body Simulator – Interactive 3 Body Problem and Gravitational Physics

https://trisolarchaos.com/?pr=lagrange&n=3&s=5.0&so=0.01&im=verlet&dt=5.00e-4&rt=1.0e-6&at=1.0e-8...
92•speckx•6d ago•16 comments
Open in hackernews

Netflix Kills Casting from Its Mobile App to Most Modern TVs

https://www.macrumors.com/2025/12/01/netflix-kills-casting-from-mobile-app-to-tvs/
77•Brajeshwar•1h ago

Comments

koinedad•39m ago
Not sure the full motivation behind this but this is very annoying for a parent with kids. Especially if you've lost your remote, or want to quickly find something and cast it to your Chromecast/Apple TV.

I'd prefer video streaming apps be required to support Casting/AirPlay.

jaffa2•33m ago
All this app stuff is so annoying. I reverted back a while ago. Now when i want the radio on i just switch it on. With an actual switch. Same with my lights— an actual real switch! Theres no benefit to chaining all your behind someapp the needs updated installed, logged in passwords, managed, ooo you haven’t logged in for 90 days lets send you an email to update your password- bro i just want to increase my heating. Its all nonsense. Sooner people realise the better.
inanutshellus•25m ago
TODAY I got an email saying my robot vacuum cleaner, which only works via an app, would no longer work with said app.

It has no physical buttons to manage schedules, just a "spot clean now" button.

Awesome. Welcome to the future.

looperhacks•21m ago
You may want to check if your robot is supported by Valetudo: https://valetudo.cloud/
jansper39•13m ago
Reading through that site, it seems like instead of locking yourself into a corporations app, you're locking it into his instead. He doesn't seem to want to run an open source community, he's building an app for himself and publishing it for people who have exactly the same use case as him.
fwip•6m ago
True, but you don't need to install updates once you have the software installed, and it's probably better not to. The software on the robot doesn't need the app to control, either - it exposes an API that either the app or custom software can talk to, sans cloud servers.
inanutshellus•10m ago
ooo thanks for the link, buuut it appears NEATO Robotics vacuums aren't supported ... yet.

I had hoped Home Assistant might be able to handle it but it appears their integration just sends the data to NEATO, which no no longer works.

https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/neato/

Blarg.

ryandrake•19m ago
Nobody on HN wants to hear this, but REG-U-LA-TION. The glorious free market is consistently failing to solve the growing problem of cloud-tethered and app-tethered products being nerfed by their manufacturers after the point of sale.
tsunamifury•13m ago
I think those who believe regulation is universally the devil forget the era where products were received DOA and customers had no recourse while companies simply called it profit.
alyandon•3m ago
I can't take anyone that views regulation as universally evil seriously when history is full of stuff like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radithor
nine_k•5m ago
Sorry, but it's CUS-TO-MERS. They buy stuff that can only be controlled via an app talking to the cloud. They buy stuff that cannot be repaired. They buy stuff that openly lies about its specs, for an "unbelievably good price". The customers go for the cheapest, all else be damned.

Education in general, and about critical thinking in particular, could help.

deaux•3m ago
But that's why the EU is so "behind" on cultivating parasitic FAANG-style tech megacorps! If they'd just do away with regulations, the EU could have some of their own, such joy!

Move fast and screw society for tasty RSUs!

mikeyouse•30m ago
I’ve helped several elderly neighbors get setup with casting to their TVs as well. Just a debacle that’s going to frustrate a bunch of people for no good reason. Really wish the teams that implement ‘features’ like this were forced to deal with the consequences. At least in the olden days, they’d get feedback in the form of calls and complaints to their help line but now it’s just “Too bad, app changed, deal with it.”
littlecranky67•18m ago
Well, the consequence would be to cancel the subscription now?
mock-possum•21m ago
Probably to drive people to piracy
ZeroConcerns•21m ago
> this is very annoying for a parent with kids

But the parents without kids, will they at least continue to be leafs? (Yeah, yeah, I'm sorry...)

hollerith•12m ago
>I'd prefer video streaming apps be required to support Casting/AirPlay.

Do you mean required by law?

happymellon•10m ago
Required by store?
koinedad•3m ago
No, I’d say the App Store,

I consider it a device perk. I bought the iPhone and Apple TV largely because of airplay so if they remove that functionality it will move me to use other streaming services that support it or I’ll just buy movies again and stop paying streaming altogether.

darrylb42•35m ago
I guessed this was coming after you couldn't cast to a device that was logged into a different account. Would be a nice experience to be able to cast Paw patrol from one of the kids accounts instead of cluttering the in-laws view history with kids shows.
happymellon•2m ago
But then how would they charge you extra for being at a second location?
wincy•34m ago
By “directs to remote” does it mean the TV remote? I feel like I’m missing something here, it’s just saying “use the smart tv’s built in app”? Directing someone to the remote seems like an overcomplicated way of indicating this?

I’m so glad we use plex, have thought of making the jump to jellyfin though. I tried to use my MacBook Air to watch their excellent Michelin Stars show, but couldn’t watch it on 2/3 of my monitors because they don’t have HDCP built in. Modern disk drives are so cheap you can just download everything in 4K HDR, paired with an OLED display it’s absolutely breathtaking how good modern media can look.

So anyway, with the Michelin show I just downloaded it off a torrent site instead, which is a hilariously easier user experience and it’s caused by the very HDCP that is supposed to prevent piracy.

daveoc64•32m ago
>By “directs to remote” does it mean the TV remote? I feel like I’m missing something here, it’s just saying “use the smart tv’s built in app”? Directing someone to the remote seems like an overcomplicated way of indicating this?

Yes, that's what it means.

Some other streaming apps encourage using their mobile app as a remote, so I would imagine they are making it clear that the app should not be used at all here.

baggachipz•34m ago
more rent-seeking from a pantheon member of rent-seekers.
troupo•28m ago
I've worked in streaming. If you see a feature pulled, or announced and delayed, or announced and never shipped, 99.99999% of the time it's due to licensing. Every single permutation of any action that a user may find beneficial is covered by a different license with a different cost.

Oh. And ads. There's another can of worms if you need to serve ads.

In this case it could be that Netflix is an asshole. Or could be that they really could not figure out proper device atteibution and ad reporting to the leeches that are the content owners and ad networks.

LogicFailsMe•25m ago
Don't build the Torment Netflix? These fundamentally anti-consumer moves are why it's called the Internet of sh**y things.

I have no concern whatsoever whether this is about licensing or just money grubbing. You're making things suck for the paying customer. But to be fair, all the streaming services are chasing the last few drops of blood from the stone trying to stop people from actually watching from two screens they paid for in two different locations and other idiocy. I canceled Netflix a while back. And I only watch prime video through an ad blocker on my PC now. Clearly I must hate freedom.

buellerbueller•19m ago
Advertising is a virus that invades and destroys every ecosystem it can.
mingus88•15m ago
I’m really leaning towards them being an asshole in this specific case.

Chromecast works in my EV for every other streaming app, so the licensing seems to be a solved problem for them. Netflix, however, never worked and my EV manufacturer had to release a support page specifically for Netflix not working.

I suspect this is just more account security. I remember paying $20/mo for a premium plan with a set number of screens on the contract…but one day their side changed and those screens had to be on my WiFi. I was no longer paying per screen. I was now paying per-household, but I never agreed to that change.

I cancelled Netflix after 15 years (DVD era) and have never looked back. Just hostile decision after hostile decision.

bryanlarsen•28m ago
As of Nov 10, Netflix removed the ability to cast at all for anybody on the ad-supported tier.

A hostile move, but understandable money grubbing.

This is less understandable.

gnarlouse•20m ago
Netflix is fucking its business up by trying to be a studio IMO. The service was perfect when they were a streaming platform. The studio arm's script selection and production quality makes me want to gauge my eyes out.

When you pay an arm and a leg every month for Netflix, you're funding a studio that pumps out the equivalent of screeching goblin sounds. Makes no sense.

bryanlarsen•7m ago
Did they have a choice? In the beginning the studios gave them access to their catalog for cheap. The studios understandably stopped doing that.
zdragnar•2m ago
I don't know that Netflix had much of an option. Once the studios and networks realized how much money they were leaving on the table by not running their own exclusive streaming services, the licensing costs to Netflix blew up or simply became entirely unavailable.

Netflix running their own studio was a reasonable attempt at regaining some exclusivity, even if it's been executed poorly in many cases.

I'm not sure how much longer I'll keep my subscription as we've hardly used it in months at this point, but I also don't have any other subscriptions any more either, so I'm not exactly a great bellwether.

lunias•18m ago
I don't understand Netflix's decision, but I'm long past caring about things like this. I've had PCs hooked up to all of my televisions for the past 15+ years because of how limiting and frustrating using any other device to play media from can be.
Razengan•9m ago
BitTorrent → Local Media Player App

Still the best way to watch movies and shows.

Even if we pay $100 dollars to streaming services they will never not be too dumb to know how to make a convenient player that isn't hostile to its users.

fireflash38•9m ago
That's also rather shit, unless you're using a prescribed browser and operating system.

We've rebuilt cable boxes, but somehow they're even shittier than before.

mingus88•6m ago
I’ve run homebrew DVRs since the MythTV/Hauppauge era and it’s true

My family won’t adapt to anything in the living room with a keyboard and mouse, and getting a reliable remote on any PC based solution is often problematic.

oooyay•3m ago
What OS do you run? I was thinking of doing this with SteamOS.
thot_experiment•16m ago
shit like this is why I've recently totally given up on everything except Bandcamp and torrents, I really wish I could just pay for the 50gb mkvs with the 10bit color, atmos and film grain like I can for flacs

but good damn is life nice when you just have files, a network and zero drm and limitations

turnsout•15m ago
This only strengthens my decision to invest in 4K Blu-ray. We're fully in the enshittification stage of streaming TV.
tsunamifury•14m ago
Netflix’s seemingly baffling decisions all make sense when you realize one thing:

Netflix sees no more technological future or market opportunity for themselves that will increase profits, so reduction of features and up charging are the only strategies.

It’s a testiment to the blindness and stupidity of their workers and leadership that in the era of the most cutting edge breakthroughs in video, Netflix believes the future is in removing functionality.

jjbinx007•14m ago
"One Reddit user said customer service explained that devices with remotes can no longer cast, claiming the decision was made to improve the customer experience."

How can this improve the customer experience?

exe34•6m ago
The reason isn't meant to be true/correct/verifiable. It's meant to be a positive sounding soundbite.
hooverd•5m ago
It doesn't. They're just lying.
xnx•14m ago
Is this, in part, an anti-copying measure?
baggachipz•6m ago
Given that they block login sharing, I think it's most likely the following scenario:

Friend with a Netflix account comes to your house, casts Netflix to your TV. No need for you to have a Netflix account in that case. Whereas, they want to force you to also have a Netflix account to watch on your TV.

estebarb•7m ago
Currently it is impossible to use Netflix on screens connected via DisplayLink. Which is the only way to connect 2 monitors in older M processor MacBooks.
jerlam•7m ago
Kind of wild that Netflix is (or believes) it is so far ahead of all the other streaming services that they're nickel-and-diming their customers for every little feature.

Other services were aggressively throwing Black Friday sales in order to boost their subscriber counts. I picked up HBO for 70% off, and there were also Hulu and Apple TV discounts. And I didn't need any of them because there's plenty of ad-supported content on YouTube, Tubi, and other services.