frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Fabrice Bellard Releases MicroQuickJS

https://github.com/bellard/mquickjs/blob/main/README.md
428•Aissen•2h ago•139 comments

Terrence Malick's Disciples

https://yalereview.org/article/bilge-ebiri-terrence-malick
24•prismatic•54m ago•1 comments

Volvo Centum is Dalton Maag's new typeface for Volvo

https://www.wallpaper.com/design-interiors/corporate-design-branding/volvo-new-font-volvo-centum
39•ohjeez•1h ago•32 comments

Meta is using the Linux scheduler designed for Valve's Steam Deck on its servers

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Meta-SCX-LAVD-Steam-Deck-Server
318•yellow_lead•3h ago•152 comments

Towards a secure peer-to-peer app platform for Clan

https://clan.lol/blog/towards-app-platform-vmtech/
37•throawayonthe•2h ago•7 comments

Adobe Photoshop 1.0 Source Code (1990)

https://computerhistory.org/blog/adobe-photoshop-source-code/
376•tosh•5d ago•109 comments

Instant database clones with PostgreSQL 18

https://boringsql.com/posts/instant-database-clones/
321•radimm•12h ago•131 comments

We replaced H.264 streaming with JPEG screenshots (and it worked better)

https://blog.helix.ml/p/we-mass-deployed-15-year-old-screen
163•quesobob•2h ago•112 comments

Astrophotography Target Planner: Discover Hidden Nebulas

https://astroimagery.com/techniques/imaging/astrophotography-target-planner/
36•kianN•4d ago•3 comments

Test, don't just verify

https://alperenkeles.com/posts/test-dont-verify/
156•alpaylan•7h ago•106 comments

Executorch: On-device AI across mobile, embedded and edge for PyTorch

https://github.com/pytorch/executorch
95•klaussilveira•5d ago•14 comments

An initial analysis of the discovered Unix V4 tape

https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20251223/?yc261223
39•DSpinellis•2h ago•3 comments

Perfect Software – Software for an Audience of One

https://outofdesk.netlify.app/blog/perfect-software
7•ggauravr•3d ago•1 comments

Font with Built-In Syntax Highlighting (2024)

https://blog.glyphdrawing.club/font-with-built-in-syntax-highlighting/
129•california-og•10h ago•27 comments

Local AI is driving the biggest change in laptops in decades

https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-models-locally
124•barqawiz•20h ago•97 comments

The post-GeForce era: What if Nvidia abandons PC gaming?

https://www.pcworld.com/article/3013044/the-post-geforce-era-what-if-nvidia-abandons-pc-gaming.html
92•taubek•3d ago•151 comments

Help My c64 caught on fire

https://c0de517e.com/026_c64fire.htm
7•ibobev•1h ago•0 comments

The Coffee Warehouse

https://www.scopeofwork.net/the-coffee-warehouse/
40•NaOH•4d ago•35 comments

Space Math Academy

https://space-math.academy
17•dynamicwebpaige•3d ago•6 comments

Snitch – A friendlier ss/netstat

https://github.com/karol-broda/snitch
294•karol-broda•19h ago•93 comments

10 years bootstrapped: €6.5M revenue with a team of 13

https://www.datocms.com/blog/a-look-back-at-2025
236•steffoz•12h ago•88 comments

iOS 26.3 brings AirPods-like pairing to third-party devices in EU under DMA

https://www.macrumors.com/2025/12/22/ios-26-3-dma-airpods-pairing/
137•Tomte•14h ago•107 comments

Carnap – A formal logic framework for Haskell

https://carnap.io/
95•ravenical•11h ago•19 comments

It's Always TCP_NODELAY

https://brooker.co.za/blog/2024/05/09/nagle.html
438•eieio•23h ago•159 comments

Ryanair fined €256M over ‘abusive strategy’ to limit ticket sales by OTAs

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/dec/23/ryanair-fined-limit-online-travel-agencies-ticke...
206•aquir•9h ago•221 comments

Show HN: CineCLI – Browse and torrent movies directly from your terminal

https://github.com/eyeblech/cinecli
283•samsep10l•15h ago•96 comments

Dancing around the rhythm space with Euclid

https://pv.wtf/posts/euclidean-rhythms
26•dracyr•1d ago•0 comments

Stop Slopware

https://stopslopware.net/
91•bradley_taunt•4h ago•114 comments

The Illustrated Transformer

https://jalammar.github.io/illustrated-transformer/
467•auraham•1d ago•85 comments

Inside CECOT – 60 Minutes [video]

https://archive.org/details/insidececot
1397•lawlessone•19h ago•411 comments
Open in hackernews

How did DOGE disrupt so much while saving so little?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/23/us/politics/doge-musk-trump-analysis.html
90•JumpCrisscross•2h ago

Comments

arealaccount•2h ago
Many of the people they cut were able to negotiate a full year severance, then were hired back as contractors effectively earning double pay.
jrm4•2h ago
Good for them.
CamelCaseName•2h ago
Not so good for taxpayers.
ares623•2h ago
Which is also them
exe34•2h ago
It was never about saving money for the tax payers! They voted for this.
chowells•2h ago
Basically irrelevant to taxpayers. Their salaries or triple their salaries will add up to a difference of a couple dollars on the average tax bill. Doge didn't actually cut any of the big expenses. It was only intended to cut the effective things.
boogieknite•2h ago
consulting company i work at hired a grip of these people for construction and public land projects. struggle with guilt that our success is the result of capitalizing on incompetence and lies

we certainly charge at least 3x cost for gov to employ them on top of whatever severance they might have received. the work still needs to be done and specific people know how to do it. sort of becoming a staffing agency because theres so much profit in it. makes my stomach sick writing this out

nineplay•51m ago
They will also be paying somewhere around 50k a year soon for heath insurance because contractors don't get benefits. Fun!
iwontberude•2h ago
We all knew this would fail. Any leader worth their salt would know massive reorganizations are failures even when they aren’t unconstitutional and worthy of the death penalty.
jrm4•2h ago
Systematic of so much clown techbro thought; idiots only see the obvious nicks and problems -- and even occasional absurdity -- in large institutions, and think they can come in fix everything.

It's just an extension of good ol' Chesterton's fence.

InsideOutSanta•2h ago
Perhaps because disrupting things was the actual goal, rather than saving money. DOGE was highly effective in harming the entities meant to oversee Musk's companies, stealing information about union organizing and labor complaints, reducing the government's ability to collect taxes, and destroying its regulatory capacity.
exe34•2h ago
I don't understand how people don't get this. There's a list of such agencies being gutted, but because it's compiled by democrats, the maggats just claim it's "biased".
BennyGezerit•2h ago
This is the right take
underlipton•1h ago
There is a certain class of American that rides the knife edge between credulity and contempt in supporting and accepting the activities and intent of bad actors who pledge to get rid of the things they don't like and they people they detest. They're ever-ready to believe the barest of excuses and to hand-wave the worst excesses in this regard. Today's anti-woke are yesterday's McCarthyists, and history will note the echo.
MisterTea•1h ago
> There is a certain class of American

The selfish kind. Unfortunately that seems to be the end goal of the American dream: "I got mine, fuck you." I can't tell you how many times I heard the "protect my family" argument from people I never thought would vote for that clown.

throwrqX•1h ago
The purpose of a system is what it does
ourmandave•1h ago
Or maybe the unelected moronic clown running it went in with a chainsaw like when he took over twitter.

Giving zero f*cks for the massive harm caused or the legality of it.

saltcured•1h ago
This is disturbing.

They actually had competence at something..?

epistasis•2h ago
I remember people citing the All-In podcast about "you can always cut 10% without affecting things negatively" or something silly like that. Or thinking that $1T/year of cuts is something that's possible without taking out social security and medicare and tons of defense spending.

I can not tell you how much respect I have lost for anybody involved with the All-In podcast. They sold out all credibility for political wins for wanna-be fascists.

These jokers all got lucky, obviously. They can not perform basic analysis of organizations, clearly. What a joke of a result!

thwarted•1h ago
PJ O'Rourke had a line in his book "Parliament of Whores" when he, as a layman, ham-fistedly cuts a bunch of stuff from the federal budget, and then just subtracts 10% from it at the end. Probably not the originator, but a quote I think about often.

"Add it all together, and I've cut $282.8 billion, leaving a federal budget of $950.5 billion, to which I apply O'Rourke's Circumcision Precept: You can take 10 percent off the top of anything. This gives me another $95 billion in cuts for a grand total of $337.8 billion in budget liposuction."

Parliament of Whores, page 103.

epistasis•1h ago
I have never worked for the government, but have worked in industry that deals with government employees. One thing that is very different in industry than in government budgets is that industry budgets do have that 10% of waste. But the budgets of all government orgs I have seen are incredibly lean, especially on the salary side. The government gets mission-driven folks that are willing to give up income in order to accomplish the things they want in the world. I saw this most clearly at CDC, all the scientists I interacted with could double their salary over night by going to private industry, but they stayed where they were because they were more interested in doing meaningful and impactful work. And when it came to the budgets that CDC used to accomplish scientific work, they were even more frugal and effective than the most penny-pinching academic labs I saw. Industry is awash in waste in comparison to how effective the dollars were that were spent at CDC.

And the CDC work is all pre-competitive work that boosts the efficacy of everything else in the economy. A tiny amount of money that results in so much more economic activity and savings than could be imagined in most private industry. And all the numbers for the public savings on, say, food safety are all clearly laid out in long reports. Reports that nobody at DOGE would ever read because they don't believe than anything good could be produced by people who accept lower salaries for higher impact.

piva00•1h ago
I've seen private companies cutting down on logging expenses that would completely fund my friend's whole research department at Stockholm's University.

There's absurd waste in private companies which always makes me laugh when people say the government is inefficient.

thdrtol•2h ago
We all fall into this trap, thinking we can do better than others.

The problem is that Elon Musk has power (in the form of money) and was able to buy his way into the government.

Elon Musk is a smart salesman but that's about it. He has little deep knowledge in a lot of what he does.

kelseyfrog•2h ago
> Elon Musk is a smart salesman but that's about it.

How is it that most people here can see through it, but people in power can't?

glitchc•2h ago
The way most of our governments are set up, the people in power typically arrive on the backs of the people with money. Elon Musk has a great deal of wealth, so everyone in power is going to listen to him.
JumpCrisscross•2h ago
> but people in power can't?

Why do you presume they can’t? Musk failed phenomenally to sell DOGE to the public, the President or the Congress. The expectation was that he’d have been better at that.

queenkjuul•1h ago
Money and power are all that matters. Musk is a dipshit but he's a rich and powerful dipshit and that's all that matters
epistasis•1h ago
Power respects power, ultimately. If you have wealth and power, those in power assume it was earned, because otherwise it's admitting that their own power could be through luck.

I will say that there are a few billionaires out there that do not get respect because everybody else assumes they "got lucky," but it's certainly not many billionaires. And those that people assume "got lucky" have mostly had terrible PR management on their way up, and not bothered to try to clean up their image. I have taken investment from one such billionaire that people would tell me "he got lucky," and though I don't think he got lucky to make his billions, he was also really terrible in his judgement and could not make the switch to investing even in similar industries successfully.

neko_ranger•52m ago
"Why do companies hire consultancies?"
morgan814•1h ago
> We all fall into this trap, thinking we can do better than others.

It took me a while to learn this lesson about complex systems.

First week at a new job? It’s easy to identify all the ways things are done wrong. Six months later you begin to understand why they were done “wrong”.

josefritzishere•2h ago
The intent was never savings. Hackers and Accountants are completely different specialties. If you send in hackers, the intent is obviously to hack, not conduct forensic accounting. (The inverse would also be true of course)
aaa_aaa•2h ago
Because "government efficiency" is an oxymoron?
inejge•2h ago
Because there wasn't that much to save, compared to the sheer size of the budget? Because it's much easier to destroy than to build, generally? Because it's always been more of an ideological exercise and a revenge vehicle than a real cost-saving venture?
api•2h ago
Seemed like it was more about an ideological purge and possibly exfiltrating data than saving money.

I predicted it would net cost money if you did a full accounting. May end up being true.

queenkjuul•2h ago
If musk, Trump, or any of their allies had any interest in cutting spending, they wouldn't have passed budgets increasing the deficit every chance they've had.

Must got what he wanted: some minor disruption to agencies that regulate him personally, the fear of god put into thousands of federal employees, and ostensibly federal data to help him bust unions.

The side effect of disrupting thousands of normal hard working people's lives it's just icing on the cake for a miserable prick like him, even if he did have to hire most of them back.

But if they could destroy the regulatory state while ALSO doubling the deficit with federal spending on defense, space, and oil, i don't doubt for a second they would do so.

ourmandave•1h ago
Because of the sheer idiocy of all involved.

There was no plan, no thought process behind any of the cuts.

Unless they thought appearing to be complete morons would distract from their actual mission of stealing all the Federal data they could.

The whole operation of black hats need to be investigated.

diego_moita•1h ago
Because what they wanted was to "disrupt" and "saving" wasn't what they wanted.
dwoldrich•1h ago
They claim $1329.19 saved per taxpayer. https://www.doge.gov/savings

As long as we're in fiat, debt-based, race to the bottom, universally-enshittificate mode, that's a big ol' fart nothingburger. Call me when the Fed ends.

Doge dealt well-deserved shocks to the comfy bureaucracy and revealed corruption in the NGO's. The bureaucracy, the military/IC, the media, the banksters, the bought and paid for reps - it's all one of a piece. Doge helped a lot of people come to that conclusion, so that's helpful. I think Trump's people are all acting to mask whatever they're really doing anyhow. It's absurd WWF kayfabe nonstop and has been for years.

epistasis•1h ago
Why would you believe any numbers coming out of DOGE? The entire article is about their clear lies about their own numbers. Posting a number from the DOGE website and believing it is not rational behavior.

Further, there is nothing that will make the US poorer than ending the Fed or fiat money. The US has blown past all other economies in the world because of fiat money and its special status.

> revealed corruption in the NGO's.

No, it absolutely did not. DOGE revealed the corruption of DOGE. It's all political corruption, eliminating the regulators for Musk's empire, cover it up with lies about other things.

> Doge helped a lot of people come to that conclusion, so that's helpful.

The only thing that DOGE convinced people of is that Musk is a fraud. Nobody lost trust in the government because of anything Musk did, nobody thought "Oh I used to think that USAID was good, now I think it's bad!" Musk's popularity has hit rock-bottom, he has ruined some of the most valuable consumer brands in the world.

It's odd to see so many words that are directly contradicted by plain reality. One must be in a very very very deep information bubble to see your post

dwoldrich•1h ago
> It's all political corruption, eliminating the regulators for Musk's empire, cover it up with lies about other things.

I just don't see the world this way, and I don't think my being argumentative about it is healthy for either of us.

> deep information bubble

The same could be said for you. You've left very little room for nuance.

I am not a direct investor in any of his businesses, and my opinions are my own. Musk was and is the largest military contractor, bought and paid for. He's a genius marketer, autistic, and gets his hands dirty on projects technically. He's not an idiot and he is socially awkward. I believe whatever big projects Musk starts are at the urging and partly the direction of the US military.

It seems clear (to me) that Musk is crushing it in most of his businesses. It's clear (to me) that the on again, off again relationship he has with the Trump administration was just pro wrestling kayfabe. It is impossible for me to impute motives to Musk, he says pro-human things and he works (potentially) very anti-human projects. I am apprehensive about everything he has his paws in.

epistasis•59m ago
My worldview is to pursue truth above all else. If that results in arguments, fine, it's a price I'm willing to pay for honesty and reality!

If there was nuance, please provide it. I don't see any in your comment at all, but I dos see lots of generalizations and a very narrow take on the world and where wealth comes from.

I would love nothing more than to improve my world view through argumentation, but that requires providing facts rather than trafficking in the falsehoods of others, like those of DOGE.

dwoldrich•42m ago
> If there was nuance, please provide it.

I'm just not locked in good guy, bad guy mode. As I said, I'm apprehensive about what Musk does.

I think a lot of people think that Musk betrayed them and their politics and so everything he touches is automatically el diablo. The anti-woke Twitter thing was the last straw because it meant a hit against their moral superiority. I will just say that when lots of people thought he was a good guy, I was apprehensive about him then too.

> generalizations and a very narrow take on the world

Generalizations also means I can be open to new ideas, if you want to be charitable to me.

> I would love nothing more than to improve my world view through argumentation

I don't believe it is possible to change anyone's deep set ideas. I have come to the conclusion that trying to is hurtful/spiteful.

tastyface•1h ago
Pray tell, what corruption did DOGE reveal in the NGOs?
dwoldrich•56m ago
Here's one of the big public hearings in the aftermath. D's got their digs in if that helps encourage you to watch.

https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/public-funds-private-age...

_DeadFred_•1h ago
Where are the prosecutions? Where are the announced investigations into this corruption? They don't exist because the found 'fraud' doesn't exist.
dwoldrich•1h ago
I agree fully on the prosecutions. It's long since time for scoundrels to be frog marched off to jail.

I am of the opinion that there was corruption (waste and fraud and abuse) in pre-doge government. If you think everyone was clean and good, well ... I disagree.

IMO, post-doge things are "better" only because we saw some of the inside of the sausage factory. Nothing got materially any better.

bryanlarsen•54m ago
The frog marching should start at the top.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/05/09/trump-oil...

dwoldrich•40m ago
Let's agree to frog march past presidents, too.
bryanlarsen•17m ago
Like who, for what?
cjoelrun•1h ago
Immune systems of all interested triggered.
stranded22•47m ago
Because it was about Elon musk’s companies getting out of being investigated. His pay off for helping Trump.
jgbmlg•27m ago
2nd law of thermodynamics is what makes destructiveness so costly. It is much easier and cheaper to destroy than to build or rebuild. The Trump administration is devaluing the United States at an alarming rate.