frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Calendar

https://neatnik.net/calendar/?year=2026
342•twapi•5h ago•57 comments

Replacing JavaScript with Just HTML

https://www.htmhell.dev/adventcalendar/2025/27/
367•soheilpro•9h ago•114 comments

Manus AI 100M USD ARR

https://manus.im/blog/manus-100m-arr
28•ms7892•2h ago•22 comments

How we lost communication to entertainment

https://ploum.net/2025-12-15-communication-entertainment.html
426•8organicbits•13h ago•210 comments

Fathers’ choices may be packaged and passed down in sperm RNA

https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-dads-fitness-may-be-packaged-and-passed-down-in-sperm-rna-2025...
183•vismit2000•8h ago•99 comments

Rex is a safe kernel extension framework that allows Rust in the place of eBPF

https://github.com/rex-rs/rex
51•zdw•5d ago•30 comments

Floor796

https://floor796.com/
738•krtkush•20h ago•90 comments

C++ says "We have try at home."

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20251222-00/?p=111890
12•ibobev•3h ago•1 comments

The Origins of APL (1974) [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kUQWuK1L4w
20•ofalkaed•6d ago•3 comments

Gpg.fail

https://gpg.fail
352•todsacerdoti•17h ago•193 comments

Hacking a Java Minecraft server with memory overflows using in-game mechanics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zy6Ci-K-0K8
8•jblazevic•3d ago•0 comments

Dialtone – AOL 3.0 Server

https://dialtone.live/
42•rickcarlino•6h ago•22 comments

Project Vend: Phase Two

https://www.anthropic.com/research/project-vend-2
120•kubami•5d ago•39 comments

Plugins case study: mdBook preprocessors

https://eli.thegreenplace.net/2025/plugins-case-study-mdbook-preprocessors/
6•ingve•5d ago•0 comments

Rainbow Six Siege hacked as players get billions of credits and random bans

https://www.shanethegamer.com/esports-news/rainbow-six-siege-hacked-global-server-outage/
179•erhuve•14h ago•51 comments

Immer – A library of persistent and immutable data structures written in C++

https://github.com/arximboldi/immer
75•smartmic•6d ago•10 comments

Text rendering hates you (2019)

https://faultlore.com/blah/text-hates-you/
137•andsoitis•6d ago•52 comments

Windows 2 for the Apricot PC/Xi

https://www.ninakalinina.com/notes/win2apri/
125•todsacerdoti•15h ago•27 comments

Liberating Bluetooth on the ESP32

https://exquisite.tube/w/mEzF442Q4hUXnhQ8HmfZuq
57•todsacerdoti•11h ago•7 comments

Show HN: Ez FFmpeg – Video editing in plain English

http://npmjs.com/package/ezff
366•josharsh•1d ago•182 comments

Nvidia's $20B antitrust loophole

https://ossa-ma.github.io/blog/groq
451•ossa-ma•16h ago•136 comments

7- and 14-segment fonts "DSEG"

https://www.keshikan.net/fonts.html
43•anigbrowl•11h ago•7 comments

Say No to Palantir in the NHS

https://notopalantir.goodlawproject.org/email-to-target/stop-palantir-in-the-nhs/
287•_____k•12h ago•82 comments

A new research shows that 21-33% of YouTube's feed may consist of AI slop

https://www.kapwing.com/blog/ai-slop-report-the-global-rise-of-low-quality-ai-videos/
98•aquir•2h ago•96 comments

Multiscale Aperture Synthesis Imager

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-65661-8
9•wisty•2d ago•0 comments

OrangePi 6 Plus Review

https://boilingsteam.com/orange-pi-6-plus-review/
167•ekianjo•21h ago•148 comments

The Dangers of SSL Certificates

https://surfingcomplexity.blog/2025/12/27/the-dangers-of-ssl-certificates/
54•azhenley•11h ago•67 comments

Interton Video Computer 4000

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interton_Video_Computer_4000
15•doener•6d ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Resources to get better at outbound sales?

192•sieep•6d ago•53 comments

Janet Jackson had the power to crash laptop computers (2022)

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20220816-00/?p=106994
271•montalbano•16h ago•106 comments
Open in hackernews

A new research shows that 21-33% of YouTube's feed may consist of AI slop

https://www.kapwing.com/blog/ai-slop-report-the-global-rise-of-low-quality-ai-videos/
98•aquir•2h ago

Comments

ChrisArchitect•2h ago
Earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46403805
999900000999•2h ago
What's the end game?

AI sloop ads for dating apps full of ai chat bots , YouTube watched by AI bots.

I was a bit surprised Spain has the most subscribers to ai sloop. Kinda weird considering the population size compared to the US

whatshisface•2h ago
The end game is that computer generation beats human content for a subset of the population who becomes accessible to advertisers and propagandists through model alignment, and unresponsive to word-of-mouth.
ralegh•2h ago
Its channels from Spain, so presumably appeals to Spanish speaking countries.
lanthissa•2h ago
the 'slop' is generally at either end of the extremes of video length, either shorts or multiple hour videos.

shorts get paid by the view, ppl put on long videos to fall a sleep to and youtube premium does a rev share based on watchtime of the premium user.

this is why you have like 10 hour playlists and white noise videos.

ninth_ant•1h ago
There is no “end game” it’s just hustlers out for a buck for themselves — YouTube, the slop makers, the ad companies, the bots scraping videos, all of em.

Same as it ever was. When this cash cow proves worthless or runs out it’ll be another thing.

bakugo•1h ago
The end game is eliminating the last remaining human element in the engagement optimization pipeline, so that the corporations can control 100% of it.

Platforms like YouTube and TikTok already have almost full control of how the majority of users spend their time on their platforms. They open the app, they immediately get a feed of content algorithmically selected to keep them on the app for as long as possible. They don't need to search, they don't need to think about what they want to watch, they just consume. Fully automated consumption with 0 human effort involved.

Well, almost. There's one last thing remaining: you still need humans to produce the content that you then put on people's feeds. Or rather, needed. Now that the actual production can also be automated, those platforms no longer need to put effort into finding existing human-created content that will keep people watching - they can just generate new, algorithmically perfect content. This is their endgame.

stcg•1h ago
Other advantages to generating content: (1) fewer copyright issues. (2) No creators to pay, just GPU bills scaling with the use of the platform. (3) a much smaller critical mass.

Given these advantages I expect the current "social media" to be replaced with a new one, rather than them pivoting. The next big thing after tiktok might be something that only has generated content, where a last final bit of "social" is taken out of "social media".

anovikov•56m ago
Why can't it be the actual tiktok? By simply winning competition with humans i.e. whereas vast majority of humans see their pay go too low to bother to continue?
ffuxlpff•55m ago
Generating stuff is very cheap compared to building and training the model. When you have your model done you're incentivized to use it as much as possible. Maybe even considering the sunken costs.
csomar•1h ago
I have noticed people on the subway watching them. I sneaked a peak on a few of their phones and it was legit AI slop with clear signs (for me at least) that it was AI generated. The end user (viewer?) seemed hooked but they are mostly shorts (10-20sec videos) and you can see their fingers swiping to the next one.

The other day my mother told me if I watched some random AI slop (Putin getting in a physical fight with Trump) and I asked her why she watches this stuff and her answer is that it comes up in her feed. She said it was funny.

I don't know what to make of any of this.

muldvarp•32m ago
> What's the end game?

What makes you think that there is an "end game"?

Someone figured out how to make computers be able to create content that is costly to distinguish from human-made content. Someone else is using it to pump out AI slop in the hopes that it will make them a quick buck. The platform becomes unusable for anyone that values their own sanity. No "end game" to be found.

AI will be the worst thing that happened to society in a very long time.

noncoml•2h ago
Matches my experience
koakuma-chan•2h ago
Works as intended. My YouTube feed is 0% AI slop.
metricflux•1h ago
Could you elaborate? What have you done to achieve a 0% slop ratio?
oefrha•1h ago
Turn off watch history and there’s no feed whatsoever, they started to refuse to show anything on the home page with watch history off since a couple years ago. Yes that includes even Shorts, you’re not allowed to doomscroll without watch history.

> Recommendations are off

> Your watch history is off, and we rely on watch history to tailor your feed. You can change your setting at any time, or try searching for videos instead. Learn more.

xorvoid•1h ago
Same. This is the way. If you use Firefox, install the "unhook" extension to remove all the junk (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-recom...)
nicbou•10m ago
UnTrap for iOS works practically the same.
latexr•26m ago
> they started to refuse to show anything on the home page with watch history off since a couple years ago.

I remember when that happened. It was hilarious to me because the way they phrased it felt like they think of it as a punishment or incentive, but not having anything on the homepage is incredibly refreshing, exactly what I wanted. YouTube’s homepage (at least in my country) is just garbage videos no one should be watching.

koakuma-chan•1h ago
Your recommendations depend on what you watch. If you don't watch AI slop, you will not receive AI slop recommendations. This is what works for me.
Lapel2742•1h ago
> This is what works for me.

Than you are the lucky one.

E.g.: Just for entertainment I recently searched for information on a new LLM model. The result was filled with AI garbage. I stumbled upon videos with AI generated content, presented by an AI generated voice and an AI generated human. And if it is not something like that, YouTube at least lies to me about the language of the video and tries to make me listen to an AI voice which is equally vile.

There are times where I constantly have to close videos after a couple of seconds. It is unbearable. At least they should mark these videos clearly. At best they should allow me to filter them out but of course they won't do that or else they couldn't make the experience on their platform even worse than it already is, what seems to be their real goal.

koakuma-chan•1h ago
That's a skill issue on your part. Do not use YouTube to search for information. If you need to find information on a new LLM model, look for official documentation from the model's maker. This applies to everything.
Lapel2742•44m ago
> That's a skill issue on your part.

No, it's not. I search for videos and i get AI garbage as a result. It shouldn't matter what i search for or if you think that it is dumb to search for it. It shouldn't return garbage in the first place unless I explicitly ask for it.

> Do not use YouTube to search for information. If you need to find information on a new LLM model, look for official documentation from the model's maker.

That is what I do but I like the entertainment factor of some YouTubers. I know that I do not get the best information from them but sometimes I'm entertained. That's why I'm using YouTube after all. Entertainment (and I'm not entertained by AI).

> This applies to everything.

So you are saying: In this glorious new AI world I need a search diploma just to evade the endless AI slop YouTube is filled with nowadays. And than there are topics that are taboo to search for at all. From what angle do I have to look at this to discover the good part?

EbNar•1h ago
Same as mine. I just don't use YouTube at all and search for information on alternative sources, preferably in text form.
jmward01•2h ago
What Youtube pushes vs what I watch are so completely different that I am shocked. I almost exclusively watch geology, space, tech and cooking and it pushes at me (quick check of the home page): disgusting cow medical procedures, random sexual videos, celebrity/influencer junk. Oh, wait, there is a geology thing....and it is a junk sci/scare video that has no actual geology related content. Yeah. Their algorithm is clearly working well. I would go to other platforms but there isn't one. I have started donating on patreon and watching there where practical (even though it is still yt serving it up) but that doesn't easily allow me to discover new things. The real challenge here is finding new things. When search is so completely broken, how do you find valid new things to watch?
behindsight•2h ago
Out of curiosity, do you have watch history enabled/disabled?

I found the feed with it enabled is much better than disabled and I have it finetuned to be more in line with the niches I care about.

I am also very proactive with marking channels or content I don't prefer with the "Not interested" or "Don't recommend channel" as well as going through and pruning any content I don't want from my watch history directly.

It's not perfect but it's orders of magnitude better than my logged out or watch history disabled account (though not sure if they have since updated it to not show anything at all)

wrxd•43m ago
It’s sad that we replaced manual curation with recommendation algorithms because they were doing the hard job of surfacing relevant content for us and the end result is that you’re spending more effort and intellectual energy into steering the algorithms in the right direction than we ever did before
KellyCriterion•1h ago
do you have an account about which "you care somehow", like banning/disabling specific channels explicitly? Ive found out: If I tell youtube what I want by sometimes thumb-up/down and explicitly clicking on "no more vids from this channel", then the results a) much better and most of the trash is removed.

Though, new AI-slop channels popup some days - esp. new/fresh channels, but these you can ban anyway since most new channels are AI slop. or "XY ... official" or "XY .. best of" or "XY .. clips" or "XY... fails"

ffuxlpff•46m ago
Probably there not enough content. Just the same repackaged in human or machine produced slop.

People are addicted to YouTube but I think the key to the healthy watching habits would be restricting the screen time.

Someone knowing about things he's interested in has few problems separating the new and informative content and if he had, say, two hours a week for watching he'd probably enjoy what he sees.

Two hours is just an estimate I came up with, it can be an two hours a month or hour a day. The important thing is that YT just doesn't create enough real new information and after that it is just slop and brain rot, regardless of your habits and filters.

jval43•24m ago
Not only that but also the same short videos keep repeating. I have tons of great suggestions from Youtube on the main feed from creators I like, yet the Shorts feed is almost 90% garbage and AI slop.

It's deliberate, I'm sure. People say they want the vegetables, but then go on to watch hours of fast food / Shorts. Clearly the algorithm knows.

tedk-42•2h ago
There are a lot of AI generated shorts around animals.

A common thing I see is a baby animal needing rescue by a human (which it does) and it comes back later on and rewards the human with a gift of some kind it thinks is valuable.

I watch a few podcasts as well and there are more that have their scripts generated and voiced by AI

rapnie•1h ago
Cats getting totally excited to see their owner, because they dearly missed them. Cats filmed in night cam dropping weird animals from the forest on sleeping boss. Olympic athletes, gorgeous, but not real. Countless disasters where people die, generated. Youtube shorts is a pile of steaming garbage. As long as it sells, your brain may rot.

Worst are imho on the regular long vids side, the geopolitical advisor deep fakes, giving background to the news. Some with well over a million followers. Many of those have the same "we are a fan of the real person" disclaimer, many have no disclaimer.

And no one in the comments, of which many look fake too, notices it is AI. That is the most scary part.

bulbar•1h ago
That's an improvement as before people would abuse real animals to fake seemingly wholesome "before-after" videos by showing snippets in the wrong order.
setopt•1h ago
Source?
bulbar•1h ago
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/how-fake-...

Another common theme is to kill rare animals to stage cool photographs. However, I don't assume AI slop will (fully) replace that cruelty, unfortunately. But maybe using AI slop will be easier than animal abuse/killing so that those business models run dry for the most part.

hamasho•1h ago
I see a lot of educational animal videos that copy the content of BBC Earth only to replace David Attenborough voice with AI, and it unreasonably irritates me.
Galanwe•34m ago
My feed is full of AI generated shorts summarizing books, animes, movies. The original piece name is never mentioned, and it tells the story in a very descriptive way, such as "The man was alone in the woods when...".
mojuba•2h ago
Skimmed through the article, some interesting numbers but not a single statistic is per capita (or per million, whatever). How do I understand the scale of the phenomenon without the per capita figures? Sorry but seems a bit useless.
throw_m239339•2h ago
How can I block AI generated videos (especially AI generated scripts) in my browser? Youtube has to give the viewer an option or the website is going suffer greatly from AI slop...

Why is youtube in general making it so hard to block content or channels? and now they made it harder to clean up the user's own viewing history, it just doesn't make sense...

EbNar•1h ago
Because quantity > quality, as long as Google keeps making money from your time, engagement and attention. Easy.
phito•1h ago
Do you believe we can automatically detect AI generated videos, without having too many false positives and without spending huge amounts of resources playing the cat and mouse game?

It's not possible and it's not economically viable. Best we could do is some sort of signature to prove that the source of a video is trusted by the proof issuer.

guidedlight•2h ago
How is YouTube going to deal with all the storage of these videos?
ohmahjong•2h ago
Maybe they will avoid the storage cost by generating this slop on the fly; who would notice?
bot403•55m ago
AI compute costs far outweigh storage costs.
pogue•1h ago
This site appears to be an AI slop generator though?
AlexAplin•1h ago
The current utilization of generative video is almost universally horrible, which this article does suggest, so I'm not too surprised there are players trying to differentiate themselves. Slop for thee, not for me.
xeonmc•1h ago
Google’s two moats, YouTube and Search, both succumbing to the same infestation to destroy its market grip I see.
bigyabai•1h ago
Ah, that's what the TPUs are for.
UberFly•1h ago
My own "research" has me in complete agreement. Venues like Etsy are now 33% Ai slop now so why should Youtube be any different?
phplovesong•1h ago
Youtube is horrible, specially the force-fed "shorts". Its 95% AI slop with the same generic graphics and voice-over. From the actual videos most are also AI generated, making me quit the video as soon as i see it.

YT has hit rock bottom. Just sad.

wodenokoto•1h ago
My shorts are mostly of the creators I follow or adjecent creators. I do get the occasional AI slop, but it looks more like the algorithm is testing someone new, to learn what they are, than the algorithm feeding me slop.

Now Facebook/insta shorts, they are somehow just trash. But maybe that is because I don’t follow any creators on those platforms.

jacquesm•1h ago
And ~90% of google searches now gives you 10 videos as answers to any query rather than just the web pages that have been turned into videos because youtube makes them more money than regular ads. Assholes.
Kiro•1h ago
Example?
jacquesm•1h ago
Any google search I do.

"how to configure arducopter gps"

9 crappy videos before they figure maybe they should link to the documentation after all.

To give them some credit, at least that search did not also come with a crappy AI summary that is broken, not applicable and wastes valuable space and bandwidth.

edit: corrected count, I missed one. And a very prominent 'see all' link before the actual one.

sen•1h ago
I searched for that exact phrase out of curiosity because I haven’t used Google in years… and it’s even worse than you say.

I got an AI summary that takes up half the screen, which doesn’t even give the right answer, then 5 YouTube videos with thumbnails and extra crud (most not even related to the question but just mention “ArduPilot” somewhere on the title), then half a page of “Other people searched for..”

Then about 3 “screens” down the page I get the ArduPilot homepage and then a bunch of embedded Reddit/Facebook discussions about ArduPilot in general, none about setting up GPS.

Google has *completely* lost the plot.

kubb•23m ago
There’s a Web tab which you can click to show only the web results, none of the AI, videos, other people, etc.

I presume you want that to be the default, but I’m sure you understand that Google can’t grant your wish, because it’s subject to market forces.

robin_reala•1h ago
Can I ask why you’re still using Google to search at this point?
wafflemaker•1h ago
There are ppl that depend on me for tech support. What search engine should I install on their phones?
exitnode•52m ago
The best free and mainstream option would be duckduckgo at the moment in my opinion.
svl•51m ago
duckduckgo: https://noai.duckduckgo.com/?q=how+to+configure+arducopter+g...

Optionally with a custom CSS rule to block the starting video block: [data-layout="videos"]

Kiro•22m ago
Regular DDG doesn't seem much better than Google: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=how+to+configure+arducopter+gps

AI summary and videos dominating it.

toyg•5m ago
AI summaries are actually rather good, in the general case. I know they take away traffic from source sites, but they work well for search users.

Videos, on the other hand, are a cancer.

PlanksVariable•41m ago
My search results were the opposite: 1. an AI summary 2. a link to the documentation 3. 4 videos that seem legit 4. a bunch more web links
Kiro•19m ago
So you're not talking about AI generated videos but just regular videos by hobbyists that you think are crap?
jacquesm•14m ago
I knew you'd come back with a comment like this one. You never argue in good faith. No, I wasn't talking about AI generated videos because then I would have written a different comment. Bye now.
hamasho•1h ago
I feel like the search result of YouTube videos on Google search is much worse than the result on YouTube itself. It's strange because Google develop both Google and YouTube search. It's like reverse Reddit, where the website's search is so unusable you have to search on Google like "xxx reddit".
walthamstow•1h ago
Gemini seems heavily tuned to return YouTube sources too
alex1138•50m ago
Yeah honestly it really makes me want to use Claude

Gemini can be a powerful model but it's just infested with the stink of Google

bot403•1h ago
Kagi search. I've never looked back. It's what Google used to be and should have stayed.
eastbound•1h ago
Kagi systematically doesn’t return any good answer whatsoever. It’s such an awful quality that I can’t imagine anyone seriously promoting it, therefore I bet these comments about Kagi are advertising posted by bots. It’s not possible otherwise.
yablak•1h ago
Happy user of kagi for several years. This is the opposite of my experience. Your comment strikes me as dishonest.
exitnode•54m ago
I am also very happy with Kagi's search result and suspect that someone is just trolling.
xigoi•55m ago
Definitely not a bot (you can check my comment history) and I can recommend Kagi.
alwa•42m ago
I find it to be more reliably useful than the other non-Google alternatives I’ve tried. I find its “PDFs Only” filter to be awfully handy too. Proudly not a bot, but I freely admit that, because I pay for it and our incentives seem aligned, I’m biased toward giving it the benefit of the doubt.

Always open to new horizons, though—are there non-Google search products that you find to consistently work better?

matthewmacleod•36m ago
Holding an opinion like “everyone apart from me is a shill or an idiot” is not an attractive quality in a human.
azuanrb•15m ago
I share the same sentiment. I know many people praise Kagi, and I respect the effort behind it too. I tried it for three months and realized it was not for me. Google works just fine for my needs.
lelele•12m ago
I evaluated Kagi a couple of months ago, but its results were swamped with AI slop, too. These days, it's mostly DuckDuckGo for me.
nicbou•17m ago
These changes are wrecking the independent web. It's crazy that people don't see LLMs as the monopolistic land grab that they are.
imiric•5m ago
The most insidious aspect is that tech CEOs and influencers keep parroting how "AI" will bring global prosperity and empower the masses. When it's clear to anyone with an ounce of reason that the exact opposite is happening. The amount of hypocrisy and manipulation is sickening.
coffinbirth•1h ago
"Deepfake Yanis Varoufakis Videos Are Flooding YouTube": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1ZewbOd2JQ

There are already a lot of impersonating AI-Slop videos appearing, not just faking Yanis Varoufakis, but also many other political commentators. It's hard to find the real videos by now.

I tried to flag these videos, but the process of doing so is so cumbersome that I finally abstained from it. AI-Slop is slowly destroying everything: books, youtube, education, in the end everything that is data driven... Where it could be useful, e.g. high quality video translation, it fails utterly.

gbrindisi•1h ago
I noticed that too and it’s kinda scary. Soon we will have the opposite of canceling, where the target will be deepfaked to say everything and its opposite to nullify their signal to noise ratio.
aucisson_masque•1h ago
That ain't exactly a study as people think of, something scientist do and that get published in a journal, peer reviewed, approved, etc.

It's just kapwing employee checking YouTube channel views and reporting it, same for the feed, so I can't say that the 21-33% number can be trusted.

Now the fact that YouTube has ai slop isn't new, but my bet is that many of these 'subscriber' are in fact bots used to inflate their numbers.

And on a more personal touch, I suggest you install YouTube unhook extension to your computer AND the ones of your relatives. The one less tech savvy that are the more susceptible to fall for this. I surprised my father once watching these kind of crap, he couldn't understand it wasnt even human made. Now I know he's safe from at least that.

noduerme•1h ago
At a societal level [if that's what we should be worried about], it's not what percentage of results are slop. It's what percentage of people believe the slop. Arguably, that seems to be decreasing proportionally. What I mean is: Slop is on a parabolic, hockey stick upward, and trust is on a logarithmic decline. So, good? - let it blow itself out? Bad information is worse than no information, and evolutionary pressures have many ways of proving that.
wenbin•1h ago
Same for podcasts (and other types of online contents) -

Here's a dataset of 26,000+ ai-generated "podcasts"

https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/listennotes/ai-generated-fak...

PeterStuer•1h ago
YouTube promotes slop and "brainrot" irrespective of AI use, this through the client being tuned for clickbait title presentation, forcing back shorts after every relaunch and promoting clickbait select single frame thumbnails.
submeta•1h ago
Same is true for Pinterest. Try to find human generated interior design images on Pinterest. It’s flooded with AI generated content.
burnt-resistor•1h ago
This is definitely true for my mom's feed because she watches so many random pet videos.

Mine is like ~1%. I'm actually surprised about how good quality the feed algo has been, and for especially showing small creators and older videos too.

Each person has their own filter-bubble, I guess.

Search engines are definitely worse. DDG shows so much AI shit websites now for specific search queries. Google is almost as bad. I'm having to double quote almost everything because the quality and fuzziness of matching is much worse now. I miss the OR operator and groups parens that were possible way back.

wrxd•51m ago
Reminder that you don’t have to play by YouTube rules. Unsubscribe from everything and disable video history, that also stops the slop recommendation engine.

YouTube search still works, you’ll still come across interesting YouTube links and if there are channels you want to subscribe to there is a way to get them in your RSS reader. You can also get the feed to be full-length videos only, ignoring all the noise coming from shorts.

shevy-java•47m ago
It has really become horrible in the last some days, probably weeks now. It is not just fake-videos AI generated, without Google having any decency to mark it, as it wastes my time and the time of others - but there are now also videos where some videos are real (I know because some of these videos came from years ago), mixed in with AI fake crap. Now, I am able to spot many AI videos, but I bet many other people simply don't have the knowledge. That is also a generational problem, where people have a harder and harder time to separate real from fiction. But I have no desire to waste my time with fake, so Google now has started to kill youtube. I still have use cases of youtube without this problem, e. g. good music (here, whether it is AI generated or not, makes no real difference IF the music is good; but most AI music is crap anyway but I can not listen to it and only focus on good music), but this is getting more and more of a dead end here.

Google already killed its search engine and other things. It is continuing on its path to now kill Youtube. And, mind you - Youtube already had problems before AI. Many content creators felt violated and abused by Google. I really think we should end Google as a company - it is not doing the world any good now. It changed completely; the old Google is permanently gone. Nobody needs the AI slop infected money-milking-via-ads machine.

Also, Google further ruined its already by-now-total-crap search engine, with crap videos nobody really cares about in 99% of the cases. Or the "others searched for xyz" - what the heck do I care what others did? If I want to find something, I don't want google to distract with excuses. Google abuses people here. It is an EVIL company now. These are not "accidents" - this is deliberately aimed at wasting people's time. I want compensation money for Google wasting my time here. This has been different in the past, so it is 100% Google's fault. No more excuses here.

Google, you are the guilty party.

Havoc•37m ago
Yeah don’t use the feed. Use subscriptions- old school chronological list of things the creators you follow published.

I do worry that yt will intentionally break that functionality in their quest for maximum enshitification though

markus_zhang•33m ago
AI is OK. I used to ignore AI stuffs on YouTube but in recent months the channel “Napoleons Hill Notes” helped me tremendously. It is an AI voice reading channel.
zeristor•33m ago
Every time I watch a video it’s like I’m running a Turing test.

Mispronunciations could be a giveaway, but then some people may have naïve pronounciations.

So many videos about nerd-sniping niche subjects.

As though we need to have a new regimen of thought discipline since so much could so easily be list.

reidrac•24m ago
It has been years now that I only care about my subscriptions. I also installed an extension to remove anything else (especially shorts!), and that works great for me.

The downside is perhaps that I rarely discover new content, but YT can't be trusted to give me that organically.

Every time I access YT without being logged to my account and this extension, I'm surprised by the amount of garbage that YT feeds me based on my IP and/or location they infer from it. I worry what effect that is having in the population that consume it without safeguarding.

Sure, there's always been garbage TV, but this is the next level, and on demand.

nicbou•15m ago
I did the same. Unhooked for desktop and UnTrap for iOS. No suggestions, no shorts, and no comments. Just the videos from creators I subscribed to.
wg0•18m ago
Fake Brian Cox and Richard Fynemen are in abundance.

Imagine 50 years down the road impossible to tell which things Richard Feynman really said in his lectures and which are all made up.