[1] https://datasheet4u.com/pdf-down/H/S/M/HSMS-2862_AgilentTech...
Really wish I was clever enough to do electronics!
This sort of thing is definitely why I come the HN.
See Dipole Calculator: https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/dipole
And you need a faster diode.
high-speed [1N5711] Schottky diode
and an LED — you can build a tiny “crystal detector” that responds to
2.4 GHz
Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and even microwave..."
That is interesting!
I never knew that a Schottky diode could rectify at 2.4 GHz -- that's pretty darn impressive!
jqpabc123•1mo ago
A friend of mine has a microwave that noticeably degrades his wifi when it is in use.
zxexz•1mo ago
Edit: I see no reason this wouldn’t work, however?
jeffbee•1mo ago
macintux•1mo ago
bgbntty2•1mo ago
I had to put the phone close to the microwave to detect this. The degradation was obviously stronger when the phone was closer.
If your friend experiences noticeable degradation regardless of the distance within the room, it might be worrisome.
But I think it's normal to have some interference. That doesn't necessarily mean enough of the 2.4 GHz radiation escapes the microwave to be harmful to an animal, as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and so on are very weak, comparatively.
Funny thing is, after putting my phone inside a closed turned off microwave, it got Wi-Fi, although very weak. I didn't try that with all the microwaves, but with 2 or 3 of them.
I think the Faraday cage around the microwave was built to be good enough for safety, but it wasn't built with Wi-Fi interference in mind.
Disclaimer: I might be wrong, as I don't have enough background to make any bold claims.
avidiax•1mo ago
Probably not. I recall calculating it once, and the legal requirements for microwave oven shielding still allow it to produce a few watts of 2.4Ghz leakage. This is contrasted to 50mW typical WiFi AP power, and 5-50mW BlueTooth powers.
A few watts is totally non-dangerous to humans, especially diffused across the entire door.
shibapuppie•1mo ago
On 2.4 GHz in the US you're allowed up to 36dbm, 30 of that can be transmitter, the remaining 6 can be a higher gain antenna.
bcook•1mo ago
nja•1mo ago
(I imagine it's a much lower cost to only handle 2.4GHz?)
tzs•1mo ago
The 16 are 4 computers (2 Macs, a Surface Pro 4, and an RPi 4), 3 mobile devices (iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch), 3 media devices (Fire TV, Nintendo Switch, and Kindle Oasis), one smart plug, a Brother printer, 3 smart speakers (Google Home Mini, two Echos), and an EV charger.
tgv•1mo ago
KaiserPro•1mo ago
They have am much lower current and voltage requirement, so might me more sensitive. You can also do tuning to use different sized antenna. However that strays into analogue eletronics, which I've not really touched for 15 years.
jeffbee•1mo ago
georgefrowny•1mo ago
pwg•1mo ago
"you can build a tiny “crystal detector” that responds to 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and even microwave oven leakage"
pseudohadamard•1mo ago