Nobody should ever forget this.

But I would say this next part is about the opposite for bare metal though:

>Use Case: High-performance computing (HPC), large databases, or legacy systems that require direct hardware access.

To get the utmost reliability out of adequate hardware then bare metal is more suitable for almost everything except for special situations.

Unless something is really wrong with the software or the overall hardware/software approach.

1. to create web versions of applications that are traditionally desktop only to render things like Parquet, PSD, TIFF, SQLite, EPS, ZIP, TGZ, and many more, where C libraries are often the reference implementations. There are almost a hundred supported file formats, most of which are supported through WASM

2. to create plugins that extend the backend and add your own endpoint or middleware as a way to enforce the code run in a constrained environment without the ability to send people's file out

3. in the workflow engine to enable people to run their own sandboxed scripts without giving those a blank check to go crazy

But also - it's lacking things like a unified positioning + required knowledge to understand it is quite large compared to average dev + most people have no real use for it. It's mostly too "abstract high level" and "low level" for most devs.

https://developers.google.com/fonts/faq/privacy

> For clarity, Google does not use any information collected by Google Fonts to create profiles of end users or for targeted advertising.

The analogy is that each layer is a slice of Emmental cheese. You end up with a bad event, only if all the holes in the slices align.

That's not completely true. With dynamic linking (now supported in WASIX), you can generate and link Wasm modules at runtime easily.