Edit: Further, the ooxml format was heavily criticised ~20 years ago, back when it was introduced. This is old news.
Surprisingly moving a lot for something dead
My impression is that this is more or less how ISO standards are supposed to work. Personally, I don't want to work in such an environment.
TBH I don't think de-big-tech will ever succeed in a capitalistic world.
Flavius•2h ago
xvilka•2h ago
[1] https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?format=gui...
cyber_kinetist•1h ago
lmz•1h ago
nickserv•1h ago
braiamp•59m ago
user205738•59m ago
stop50•2h ago
ZiiS•2h ago
2b3a51•1h ago
How do you define dated in this context?
Personally, I quite like being able to use the CUA keyboard shortcuts to access menu items. I like consistency over decades but I appreciate that there are other ways of looking at this.
Flavius•1h ago
It looks ancient, worse than office apps from 20 years ago.
barnabee•1h ago
blackhaz•43m ago
slyfox125•1h ago
Ultimately, the "classic" approach taken is because many users feel that the classic style is more usable and makes them more productive irrespective of their learned habits of the past 20-30 years.
mft_•1h ago
Anyway, the point is surely that if LibreOffice really wants to attract users from Microsoft Office, then it should do everything possible to optimise that transition?
Offering the option of a UI mimicking the familiar MS Office layout is not a difficult engineering problem. And if it makes users significantly more likely to switch, it should be a high priority to implement.
Honestly, at this stage, thinking of Gimp, FreeCAD, LibreOffice, and Blender, it’s as though there’s a weird group psychology deliberately against offering even decent (let along best-in-class) UIs in the open source world. These are all apps with excellent fundamental underlying engines/tech which are handicapped hugely by their UI/UX. (Yes I know some of these have improved in recent years, but only after far longer without improvements.)
jamesnorden•53m ago
It's already there. It really feels like such criticisms are from people who haven't used it in 10+ years.
keyringlight•1h ago
gzread•42m ago
gerdesj•1h ago
I have version 25.8.4.2 running here. It looks rather better and most importantly offers me the choice of a ribbon or not and many other choices rather than enforcing a single "opinionated" interface.
Flavius•32m ago
jamesnorden•55m ago
yason•53m ago
2b3a51•36m ago
I think this is a matter of choice and it is nice that there are choices. As other posters in this little sub-tree have suggested, there are people who value continuity over a period of time.
7bit•18m ago
Congratulations on figuring this out. It's not like the commenter you replied to said, it "feels dated" ... Oh no wait, he did.
Mikhail_K•1h ago
A big selling point for me. Needless reworking of familiar interfaces plagues MS Windows ecosystem and I'm glad LibreOffice is displaying healthy conservatism by not fixing what isn't broken.
throwaway270925•1h ago
https://www.freeoffice.com/
petepete•53m ago