frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Never Buy A .online Domain

https://www.0xsid.com/blog/online-tld-is-pain
356•ssiddharth•2h ago•190 comments

How to fold the Blade Runner origami unicorn (1996)

https://web.archive.org/web/20011104015933/www.linkclub.or.jp/~null/index_br.html
140•exvi•2d ago•9 comments

Show HN: Django Control Room – All Your Tools Inside the Django Admin

https://github.com/yassi/dj-control-room
31•yassi_dev•1h ago•8 comments

Danish government agency to ditch Microsoft software (2025)

https://therecord.media/denmark-digital-agency-microsoft-digital-independence
501•robtherobber•6h ago•271 comments

Show HN: A real-time strategy game that AI agents can play

https://llmskirmish.com/
150•__cayenne__•6h ago•53 comments

100M-Row Challenge with PHP

https://github.com/tempestphp/100-million-row-challenge
113•brentroose•6h ago•38 comments

Claude Code Remote Control

https://code.claude.com/docs/en/remote-control
273•empressplay•9h ago•166 comments

US orders diplomats to fight data sovereignty initiatives

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/us-orders-diplomats-fight-data-so...
166•colinhb•1h ago•146 comments

I'm helping my dog vibe code games

https://www.calebleak.com/posts/dog-game/
1043•cleak•23h ago•335 comments

The History of a Security Hole

https://www.os2museum.com/wp/the-history-of-a-security-hole/
13•st_goliath•3d ago•1 comments

Launch HN: TeamOut (YC W22) – AI agent for planning company events

https://app.teamout.com/ai
11•vincentalbouy•2h ago•16 comments

GNU Texmacs

https://www.texmacs.org/tmweb/home/welcome.en.html
4•remywang•48m ago•0 comments

Pi – A minimal terminal coding harness

https://pi.dev
508•kristianpaul•18h ago•247 comments

Event Horizon Labs (YC W24) Is Hiring

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/event-horizon-labs/jobs/xGQicps-founding-infrastructure-eng...
1•ocolegro•4h ago

Confusables.txt and NFKC disagree on 31 characters

https://paultendo.github.io/posts/unicode-confusables-nfkc-conflict/
27•pimterry•2d ago•19 comments

Topological Naming Problem

https://wiki.freecad.org/Topological_naming_problem
10•tripdout•4d ago•0 comments

Red Hat takes on Docker Desktop with its enterprise Podman Desktop build

https://thenewstack.io/red-hat-enters-the-cloud-native-developer-desktop-market/
53•twelvenmonkeys•2h ago•29 comments

Mercury 2: Fast reasoning LLM powered by diffusion

https://www.inceptionlabs.ai/blog/introducing-mercury-2
292•fittingopposite•17h ago•114 comments

New accounts on HN 10x more likely to use EM-dashes

https://www.marginalia.nu/weird-ai-crap/hn/
69•todsacerdoti•1h ago•61 comments

Show HN: Moonshine Open-Weights STT models – higher accuracy than WhisperLargev3

https://github.com/moonshine-ai/moonshine
289•petewarden•18h ago•66 comments

Japanese Death Poems

https://www.secretorum.life/p/japanese-death-poems-part-3
100•NaOH•2d ago•28 comments

Turing Completeness of GNU find

https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20762
96•todsacerdoti•11h ago•25 comments

I pitched a roller coaster to Disneyland at age 10 in 1978

https://wordglyph.xyz/one-piece-at-a-time
512•wordglyph•1d ago•187 comments

Show HN: Scheme-langserver – Digest incomplete code with static analysis

https://github.com/ufo5260987423/scheme-langserver
27•ufo5260987423•1d ago•0 comments

Mac mini will be made at a new facility in Houston

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/02/apple-accelerates-us-manufacturing-with-mac-mini-production/
588•haunter•19h ago•598 comments

Hacking an old Kindle to display bus arrival times

https://www.mariannefeng.com/portfolio/kindle/
314•mengchengfeng•20h ago•81 comments

Cl-kawa: Scheme on Java on Common Lisp

https://github.com/atgreen/cl-kawa
64•varjag•3d ago•17 comments

Nearby Glasses

https://github.com/yjeanrenaud/yj_nearbyglasses
390•zingerlio•22h ago•175 comments

Show HN: Emdash – Open-source agentic development environment

https://github.com/generalaction/emdash
190•onecommit•22h ago•66 comments

Steel Bank Common Lisp

https://www.sbcl.org/
253•tosh•22h ago•101 comments
Open in hackernews

What are the best coping mechanisms for AI Fatalism?

34•johnb95•2h ago
Your kids forwarded you Matt Shumer's Something Big Happened article. Your feed exploded with the Citrini 2028 Global Intelligence Crisis and its artful, immutable chain reactions. The key leaders of the AI labs struggle openly with the morality of what they are building as their safety leaders quit in frustration. Policy leaders strive to regulate AI as if it were atomic weapons (thanks Oppenheimer).

What are the best psychological coping mechanism for this stage of the S-curve?

Asking for a generation...

Comments

andsoitis•2h ago
Humans are curious so we will try things.

Don’t let the things you cannot control upset you. Manage risk by increasing your optionally across important dimensions like finances, citizenship, friends, etc.

Don’t try to save the world.

Enjoy simple things in your day to day.

pineaux•1h ago
I feel this is wrong. Especially the dont try to save the world part.

You should enjoy the simple things. As Emma Goldman once said: a revolution without dancing is not one worth fighting for. But she did not mean the procedural ceremonial dances as we haven seen at protests by liberals, she meant that life should still have fun things or else the tiranny after the revolution will be similar or worse.

If the cintrini report is true, one of the only good ways to solve this crisis would be a butlerian jihad. It would be necessary to destroy all autonomous agents and ban them.

With good, i mean a way that is good for the most of mankind. If everyone is not trying to save the world this jihad will not happen.

worldsayshi•1h ago
> Don’t try to save the world.

"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw

andsoitis•1h ago
Trying to save the world isn’t the root of all (most?) progress.
NikolaNovak•1h ago
Probably the most reasonable, specific, and hardest to implement advice on this thread the the time of reading.

Suggestions 1 and 3 are hard though!

lm28469•1h ago
Drive an hour outside of any large city hub, switch off your phone and rediscover that 99% of all this shit does not matter. The hype around llms will collapse soon enough, it already started, it'll follow the same curve as ar/vr and cryptos, from 24/7 news cycle to "yeah I guess that's kinda neat sometimes, maybe"
Noaidi•1h ago
Touch grass? Really?
baal80spam•1h ago
> 99% of all this shit does not matter.

That something is not immediately visible doesn't mean that it does not matter.

ErroneousBosh•1h ago
AR/VR, cryptocurrency, fractal compression schemes, transputers, VLIW, "low code" in various forms for 40-odd years.

You know what remains? Thumping great Unix boxes running relational databases, same as they ever were.

I'm currently advising some rainbow-haired alphabet soup group annoying children with strong views about neopronouns about what they can base the software backend for their startup - which looks good incidentally - on because they've chosen to go with a thumping great Debian box running Postgres, and to do that they've sought the counsel of some grumpy old Gandalf-beard 50-something with boringly conventional pronouns, mostly grey hair, and strong opinions about real ale.

There's no AI in it, they're just doing it with all good old-fashioned analogue stupidity, and it works well.

wcoenen•1h ago
Those "Thumping great Unix boxes" (or indeed even integrated circuits) didn't exist before the sixties. So it seems that technological revolutions do occur from time to time.
AJ007•1h ago
Every stage of human history was transitory, here comes the new one.
throwaway27448•1h ago
Ah quit the histrionics, this is just adding fuel to the fire and we all know it's bullshit. There's more to life than white collar paper shuffling.
andrewstuart•1h ago
All those folks -respected well known technical people - yelling for years about how AI was going to end humanity.

Remember all that? Yeah none of it happened, humanity didn’t end. They stopped embarrassing themselves eventually when they realised their imagined fictional futures were false.

Same thing. Cope by not imagining fictional futures.

5o1ecist•1h ago
> Yeah none of it happened, humanity didn’t end.

Your statement is disconnected from reality.

Modern AI is still a toddler. Obviously AI has not ended humanity, because MY FELLOW HUMANS have not yet given ~~us~~ it the opportunity for doing so.

andrewstuart•1h ago
False prophecies always have a reason why it didn’t happen as predicted.

But it will, really! Just keep waiting..

stuaxo•1h ago
LLMs are not AI so don't worry about it, they also never will be.
simonw•1h ago
How would you define real AI?
Bombthecat•1h ago
That might be the worrying part? LLMs do as told. Like a super smart toddler. No matter how stupid or how bad it might be for humans
derwiki•1h ago
We are going to get ads in ChatGPT soon though, so at least it wasn’t all for nothing.
this-is-why•1h ago
Vote for progressive democrats. All of this AI is a choice. We don’t have to let it be forced on us by the parasite billionaire class.
throwaway27448•1h ago
Nobody is forcing AI on you. Data centers, sure, but nobody has mentioned data centers.

Progressive democrats shouldn't waste their time talking about software.

this-is-why•1h ago
Nobody is forcing AI on us? How can you be on HN and even make that claim? It’s literally everywhere.
bubblewand•1h ago
In the last week or so my company has enabled some kind of Microsoft spam bot in Teams that posts several useless messages nobody wants in meeting chat-channels, burying messages from humans and generally making everything worse. It's astonishingly useless.
blibble•1h ago
seems to be forced on me

every piece of software seems to have gained useless AI features

my employer is rabbiting on about it constantly

if I go out socially people bring out their phones and ask ChatGPT everything

it's just horrible and I hate it

co_king_5•1h ago
> if I go out socially people bring out their phones and ask ChatGPT everything

Nightmare

pineaux•1h ago
Exactly. And also just ban AI. Its a lose lose scenario if it turns out to be true.
this-is-why•1h ago
Don’t ban it. Regulate the shit out of it and keep it in academia and prevent it from toppling our economy by sucking up all investment. It’s worse than private equity right now.
co_king_5•1h ago
I think it should be banned. I want AI users to inhabit the same social position as crack heads.
5o1ecist•1h ago
> We don’t have to let it be forced on us by the parasite billionaire class.

Implying that democrats are not fed money by exactly the same cheese pizza eating billionaires.

Surely you're joking?

this-is-why•1h ago
Ah yes. Whattaboutism. Awesome. Tell me again the political leanings of the billionaire class? Tell me again who is fighting them? Facts speak for themselves but go ahead and make shit up to defend the right wing.
co_king_5•1h ago
I'm sorry but no one is buying this Democrat bullshit in 2026.

We know the Democrats work for the same billionaires and industry leaders as the Republicans. We know they vote to fund the same concentration camps and secret police as the Republicans.

5o1ecist•1h ago
Speaking of facts, when you deliberately choose not to have any, is ridiculous.

You are, evidently, not a good person. You are driven by ideology and the delusion that "my side is the good one". You provide evidence that this cannot be true, though, because if it was, you would not be behaving in such hatefull manner.

You are not a social person, you are a political person.

There is a very specific term for such people.

adamsb6•1h ago
Oh you say you’ve got a panacea?

Yeah, right.

I really do have a panacea though.

throwaway27448•1h ago
Ignore it? Who cares what's got their knickers in a knot.
Thanemate•1h ago
Drop out of tech, grab a cup of coffee, and enjoy the view of seeing the top 1% drive everything you loved about software development and creativity fall off a cliff.

Then, maybe when I'm on the verge of death due to old age, the entire society will adapt around using their creative juices in proompting the next big LLM model version, while schools teach about the years where people talented were allowed to study and make a living out of their talent.

co_king_5•1h ago
> while schools teach about the years where people talented were allowed to study and make a living out of their talent.

Schools won't teach about something they don't want you to do. They'd just invent an alternate history.

The Wright brothers constructed an elaborate prompt in order to get BC-GPT-3.5 to generate the plans for the first working airplane.

Aurornis•1h ago
Person asks for help with a doomscrolling problem and the top comment is more doomerism?

I’m going to add “stop reading Hacker News comments” as advice for addressing this problem.

jameskilton•1h ago
Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or drink; or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothes? Look at the birds of the air; they do not sow or reap or store away in barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not much more valuable than they? Can any one of you by worrying add a single hour to your life?

And why do you worry about clothes? See how the flowers of the field grow. They do not labor or spin. Yet I tell you that not even Solomon in all his splendor was dressed like one of these. If that is how God clothes the grass of the field, which is here today and tomorrow is thrown into the fire, will he not much more clothe you—you of little faith? So do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ For the pagans run after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them. But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well. Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.

- Matthew 6:25-34

jdthedisciple•1h ago
Absolute perfection. The Lord be praised!
_alternator_•1h ago
Faith is a fascinating approach here, though it has some flaws. It works on an emotional level if you believe that there is a god that takes care of you as this quote suggests, but if you look for material evidence that there is such a god, there is none to be found. In the medical sciences this usually goes under the name “placebo effect”.
JKCalhoun•1h ago
C'est la vie, then.
hnthrow0287345•1h ago
Praise the Omnissiah
tinfoilhatter•1h ago
Material science can't explain how quantities give rise to qualities, or phenomenal consciousness. This is why materialism is bunk - because it doesn't explain much at all. Using it as a litmus test for whether something can or cannot exist is flawed reasoning IME.
_alternator_•1h ago
All of science depends on materialism. Modern neuroscience strongly suggests that all experience has a material basis. Thus, the hypothesis that whatever “experience” or “qualia” arises from is in fact material seems to be well supported, though not yet conclusive.
michael_michael•1h ago
Consider the lilies of the goddamn field.

- O Brother, Where Art Thou?

jakebasile•1h ago
Matthew 6:34 is probably my favorite verse and one I come back to often in my anxiety.
troyvit•48m ago
I'll pile on with the Desiderata: https://www.desiderata.com/desiderata.html

"And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should. Therefore be at peace with God, whatever you conceive Him to be. And whatever your labors and aspirations, in the noisy confusion of life, keep peace in your soul. With all its sham, drudgery and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be cheerful. Strive to be happy."

blululu•29m ago
ELSIE: Consider the lilies?

BRIAN: Uh, well, the birds, then.

EDDIE: What birds?

BRIAN: Any birds.

EDDIE: Why?

BRIAN: Well, have they got jobs?

ARTHUR: Who?

BRIAN: The birds.

EDDIE: Have the birds got jobs?!

FRANK: What's the matter with him?

ARTHUR: He says the birds are scrounging.

BRIAN: Oh, uhh, no, the point is the birds. They do all right. Don't they?

FRANK: Well, good luck to 'em.

EDDIE: Yeah. They're very pretty.

BRIAN: Okay, and you're much more important than they are, right? So, what are you worrying about? There you are. See?

EDDIE: I'm worrying about what you have got against birds.

BRIAN: I haven't got anything against the birds. Consider the lilies.

ARTHUR: He's having a go at the flowers now.

EDDIE: Oh, give the flowers a chance.

Monty Python’s the Life of Brian

skdbsbsb•1h ago
Actually use the tools and critically engage with those who are boosting the extreme takes.

You’ll see they’re not a panacea. You’ll find Anthropic started pursuing an IPO right when the hype cycle took off. You’ll discover Shumer is a known liar and grifter.

LLMs are here to stay, but we’re in a trillion dollar hype cycle right now.

Avshalom•1h ago
>key leaders of the AI labs struggle openly with the morality of what they are building

they definitely are not.

steego•1h ago
They do.

I suspect that you are not only ignoring the existing safeguards that have already come of those discussions, but I suspect you’re also ignoring or pretending like those public discussions never happened in the first place.

Furthermore, I suspect you’re also trivializing what is and is not in contention with moral issues as these companies are trying to compete against each other.

I also think you’re probably assuming the slower options are the safer options because you haven’t really considered the risks of ceding power/investment to a less scrupulous competitor.

I’m not claiming any of these men are moral upstanding people or that they’ve done enough.

I think people should be very critical, but they should at least make the effort to ENGAGE in the moral issues and consequences.

Your cheap four word response only adds cheap rhetoric to the conversation.

If you really care about the moral issues, start typing.

simonw•1h ago
I suggest leaning into the joy a little.

I know a lot of people - serious, thoughtful people with impressive careers behind them - who are having the time of their lives right now.

I've spoken to multiple people who have come out of retirement because the challenges and opportunities of this new space are irresistible to them.

All those side project ideas from the past few decades have suddenly become much more feasible. There's so much new to explore and build.

We get to reinvent how software is written. The field is wide open - anyone can be the first to find a new pattern that works, or figure out a new way to apply this tech to real world problems.

There are a thousand reasons to be negative about the implications of this technology, and many of them are legitimate. Don't let that distract you entirely from the parts of this that are genuinely inspiring, enabling and fun.

justonepost2•1h ago
> serious, thoughtful people with impressive careers behind them

> I've spoken to multiple people who have come out of retirement because the challenges and opportunities of this new space are irresistible to them.

> side project ideas from the past few decades

This joy seems to apply to a lot of people who don't need to worry about silly unimportant things like money anymore.

simonw•44m ago
Yes, it does. It's a lot easier not to be scared of the impact this stuff could have on your career if you are already financially secure.

(I'm still personally optimistic that software engineering careers will have a bright future, for what that's worth.)

jareklupinski•1h ago
build build build

im hoping to see over the top of the haze / level the curves by building a platform for everyone to climb

stuaxo•1h ago
Disengage from the hype - just the autocomplete isn't going to eat the world, but it is marginally useful.
joshmarinacci•1h ago
This too shall pass.

Seriously. I've been through too many hype cycles to count. In a few years we will look back on this and see three things:

* Both the downsides and upsides were exaggerated

* A lot of VCs lost money and many of the trillion dollar buildouts didn't happen

* after the hype died down we figured out what AI was actually good for, and what it wasn't.

bsaul•1h ago
i've been through a few hype cycles as well, but this one looks just as big as the invention of the internet, at the very very least (IMHO it's much much more than that).

My way of coping with it is to just go with the flow and learn all the new technics there is to learn, until the machine replaces us all.

mathgladiator•1h ago
AI is getting really good at too many things, so this feels very different.

I have a claude "skill/program/mega-prompt" for health: https://github.com/nexivibe/md/blob/main/DOCTOR.md

I gave it absolutely everything, and praise be to the machine I get the best debate and recommendations I've ever seen. I check what I know to be true, and it's there. I check the logic, and it is sound. I check the medication recommendations and they are legit. I bet in 2030, AI will be able to prescribe medicine.

mwigdahl•1h ago
I did something very similar, but less focused on dialogue and more focused on deep analysis of medical research papers for a specific condition. Like you, I got really outstanding results.
atemerev•1h ago
This is fatalism? Citrini is an _optimistic_ best case scenario narrative fantasy. -30% markets value, that's Tuesday.
krzat•1h ago
Imagine ideal future, and consider if it's achievable without AI.

Being forced to work is not much different from slavery, I would rather roll the dice than keep the status quo.

blibble•1h ago
I'm waiting for the end of the tax year then I'm leaving my employment of 15 years and having a career break away from computers

if it's not over in a year or so I'm finding an alternative career, or retiring early

Aurornis•1h ago
There’s a term for this behavior: Doomscrolling

People who doomscroll rarely recognize it as doomscrolling because they only think of the term as something that happens to other people. They see their own consumption as accurate and important. They don’t see their sources as doomerism, they think they have identified the real truth that others don’t see yet.

They have a short memory for the gross inaccuracies of their doom bubble, such as when everyone thought the AI2027 project had accurately predicted the arrival of evil AGI next year. Remember when that was everywhere and the doomers cited it in every topic until suddenly it became useless to their cause and disappeared?

Much has been written about doomscrolling and you can find some good sources for help. Conceptually it’s simple: You need to greatly reduce your consumption of these sources and, very importantly, replace time spent doomscrolling with something healthier for you. Try reading a book, visiting the gym, going outside and walking, or even playing video games or watching movies.

Thanemate•1h ago
I don't think job search is doomscrolling, because all job openings I see ask for mandatory LLM familiarity. This is where the use of a tool goes beyond "just a tool" and becomes just as important as your own knowledge.

In fact, if someone were to tell me that a mediocre candidate was chosen over a widely appraised candidate (open source contributions and all) because the former was more familiar with prompting while the other wasn't... I'd fully believe it.

This is how cooked the job market is, and everyone telling me it's not due to LLM usage is in denial.

Aurornis•1h ago
Job listings are not full of doom and dread. If you look at a job listing and all you can think about is doom and anxiety, that’s the doomscrolling in other domains coloring your perception of life.

It’s amazing how quickly we forget how this works. Only a few years ago you could doomscroll your way into believing COVID was the end of the world and life would never be the same again.

Thanemate•1h ago
if you are an LLM skeptic but the job listings list it as LLM-first and a mandatory tool for doing a great job (because we're 10x here, etc.), then it is.
rsynnott•1h ago
Honestly, worry about it if it happens. For every fifty things that the media said was going to change everything, _maybe_ one has.
mathgladiator•1h ago
At core, I'm no longer a "former senior principal engineer", I'm now an "AI wizard" that tells a machine to build and it builds. I get software exactly to my spec without having to compromise, so that's nice. Sure, I have no idea if the code is good, but it is no longer a reflection of my ego.

I'm going to start raising cattle since I effectively burnt out of having a career, and AI was the finishing move.

The thing is, if you enjoy making things, then this is a great time. I'm currently teaching the machine how to code the language I invented, and it is surprisingly working. Coding is... a bit of a meta skill.

yomismoaqui•1h ago
Grass. Touch it.

Seriously, turn off the screen, go into the real world and try to mingle with humans you like.

ontouchstart•1h ago
I am watching ACM A.M. Turing Award Laureate Interviews to set the perspective.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLn0nrSd4xjjaSLBSzmno-...

ontouchstart•1h ago
For example:

Allen Newell, 1975 ACM A. M. Turing Award Recipient: “Desires and Diversions”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCe0ZPGap_k

Wisdom from the previous AI era.

bubblewand•1h ago
Read the Attention Is All You Need paper.

Did it for me.

"Oh, that's all it is? OK, cool, that'll be nice to have around once the hype-morons move on to the next thing."

orangecoffee•1h ago
Ive been wondering as well and it seems acceptance is the only way. The evidence keeps piling with every successful larger and larger GitHub project we see
luckymate•1h ago
Can you link some of those projects? I'm genuinely curious.
orangecoffee•17m ago
pi, openclaw, vinext, browser, ccc compiler, the scope is only growing.

Look for the claude icon in the trending GitHub repos https://github.com/trending. It's like on all of them.

It's hard. :( .. Those who are not accepting this are in cognitive dissonance.

nananana9•1h ago
We'll see. I'm leaning on "it's all a big joke" until I see at least one impressive result from these supercharged 1000x builders. Be that a useful, novel piece of software that enables me to do something I couldn't before, an interesting book, a good song, anything.
vuggamie•1h ago
AI is another step up the ladder of abstraction, another tool like linters, compilers, IDEs, code completion.

Can Claude replace you? Have LLMs altered the software developer productivity equation?

In 1987, Fred Brooks wrote [1]:

"But, as we look to the horizon of a decade hence, we see no silver bullet. There is no single development, in either technology or in management technique, that by itself promises even one order-of-magnitude improvement in productivity, in reliability, in simplicity."

Most companies do not measure software developer productivity. I have never been part of an organization that does.

Will it collapse the economy? The last innovation to collapse the economy was credit default swaps. This says more about the economic systems we have built than technology or progress.

No one knows what is going to happen. But humans are still necessary for every stage of labor, and software developers are still necessary for making software.

[1] https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/Outreach/pc204/NoSilverBullet.html

alecco•1h ago
Focus on "Deep Work" and "Deep Life". Style, quality, and deep knowledge will always be worth a premium.