What an argument to make in court. It can be proved false in minutes by the plaintiffs.
It is interesting to follow how this plays out for Meta and how that will impact future cases.
In the UK you can only claim for the actual damages incurred, which at most will be the profit you would've made on the sale of that book. Which makes most claims for private infringement uneconomical for corporations.
No, because those cases were pirating-while-poor. This is pirating-while-trillion-dollar-corporation, which falls under a completely different section of the law.
"Anthropic agrees to pay $1.5B US to settle author class action over AI training"
https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/anthropic-ai-copyright-sett...
The way Disney &co coopted law to pack their coffers is a travesty: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Term_Extension_Act
Seriously? They couldn't be bothered setting upload speed to 0?
lukan•1h ago
elric•1h ago
DeathArrow•1h ago
Ekaros•1h ago
dns_snek•1h ago
The activists are against it because the big guys are exploiting us small guys, again. Nobody would give a shit if Meta was just torrenting Nintendo's IP and OpenAI was torrenting Netflix IP, except the lawyers working for these companies.
willis936•1h ago
GrinningFool•9m ago
Imustaskforhelp•44m ago
Oh no, its just legal for the big companies. The laws are different for everybody and that's what activists are worried about :)
plutokras•34m ago
By the same token, AI companies are in no position to complain when their models are scraped and distilled.
jagged-chisel•7m ago