Will I be the only one concerned that amplifying bullshit might run contrary to the mission of the national defense
To them, this is just another Tuesday.
It's possible to use just one word for it but I don't want to get banned
I think I'd be more annoyed if my government weren't using tools to make BS work more efficient.
It wouldn't be good though.
Also the whole internet started as a military project. The big reason, especially when it comes to Silicon Valley's tech is that people just don't want it until they can see what it does.
When is the point we see that boycotting these companies that are helping kill, lets say 100 little girls with a tomahawk missiles, is the very least we can do?
Not surprisingly companies are willing to get into bed with more and more questionable use cases if it helps show some desperately needed AI adoption revenue.
Companies are getting desperate to show AI adoption as right now the numbers just don’t add up.
All compute companies say they don't have enough compute to meet demands. Why do you think there isn't enough AI adoption to justify the investment?Just because you’re struggling to get raw materials for your business doesn’t make it a good business. Without strong enterprise adoption ASAP (which is what’s seriously suffering) things are going to hit the fan real quick.
So the problem is filling out forms is too onerous, but rather than fix the process, create a device that fills the form with slop and then another device that approves or rejects the slop form.
I could have sworn I signed up for the other future-the one without quite this much stupid.
...is as true now as ever.
No mistakes,
Thanks.
Gemini: "You're absolutely right! That's my bad. Here's the actual missile launch target."
1vuio0pswjnm7•2h ago