In the past, they would have wanted the motors disabled and the batteries incapacitated (if they weren't already, because half of them were trash), if they couldn't legally scare you into letting them scrap the car.
I kindof feel like there's some ulterior motive, like they want another museum piece for themselves, or sales are really hurting and they want to drum up some good will. Call me skeptical if you must, but they _really_ didn't want these on the road.
And GM could have crushed all of them, but apparently was proud enough of it and not afraid people would ‘discover its secrets’ and build a new EV, since they decided to just park a half dozen or whatever at schools for students to poke and prod at. I get that the optics of crushing them made them look like a villain from the “Captain Planet” cartoon, but it would have been foolish for them to do anything else.
Sounds line GM is taking credit for EV industry’s success after they recalled and sent to the crusher the very car model these people are trying to restore.
> The EV1 introduced technologies that remain foundational to modern EVs
kotaKat•1h ago
BrightDrop's dead, the Bolt was loved and killed and brought back and killed again, they keep making questionable decisions with their infotainment and subscription models (no CarPlay, mandatory consumer Google Account and OnStar subscriptions), the best thing they even apparently sell right now has a Honda (re)badge on it...
InUrNetz•1h ago
wlesieutre•46m ago
I do wonder what the outlook for that is now, they were supposed to be a shorter term bridge until Honda had their own EVs but Honda recently killed a bunch of EV plans so maybe the GM partnership sticks around a while?
fullstop•16m ago
bluGill•12m ago
bluGill•14m ago
sanex•1h ago
kotaKat•1h ago
fullstop•17m ago
wlesieutre•45m ago
kccqzy•52m ago
fullstop•20m ago
sidewndr46•46m ago
mediumdave•9m ago
I'm a huge fan of the Bolt, and I love my 2019. It's a very practical car, and has surprisingly decent range.
twobitshifter•5m ago