(FWIW: I suspect there are more than a few old industrial control systems and such out there that are still running DOS, just because of an "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" attitude)
But I do wonder about the practicality. This would, I presume (never done DOS development, never touched a memory extender) only run on 386+ CPUs, and maybe more importantly, probably require a newer CPU than that to run anything non-trivial at acceptable performance. So I wonder how many "real DOS machines" this can practically target.
Still, it is massively cool.
That's why you don't let people who have never touched a computer write tech laws. You get results like this.
Some people love computers and making them do weird stuff, older computers make certain tasks feel more manageable.
Translation: "Stop liking things I don't like!"
oh wait...
Different projects have different policies, and I don't know what SDLs is.
But they already have a lot of ports, so I trust they know what they're getting themselves into.
ronsor•1h ago
chaps•1h ago
queuebert•1h ago
fluoridation•1h ago
sedatk•1h ago
snazz•1h ago
Xirdus•1h ago
Dwedit•1h ago
dale_glass•1h ago
As far as I know, Worms is a normal DOS game, so the only way for that to happen should be a DOS install configured to just auto-start Worms on boot. Which makes sense as a way to keep a kid away from anything that could cause trouble.
I very vaguely recall that there used to be a very few PC games that worked as boot floppies and possibly didn't use DOS at all, but it was a rarity and Worms definitely wasn't one.
Induane•1h ago
Xirdus•38m ago
Xirdus•41m ago
BirAdam•41m ago