The weird part is, there seems to be enough demand for this that these keep popping up, but not so much that any of them ever hang around.
Here is the proof. [0]
> yes please! i need a "comment to follow" functionality on HN
So I built it. I built this for one user named swyx. I'm going to email him now letting him know I built it.
Here's some discussion of one recent one:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21172406
And some more:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42814917
And HNChat, which went a little further:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12431724
That said, don't take this as criticism. It's clearly something that some HN users want. If you can make it stick, more power to you!
HN Notifier
https://github.com/meanands/hn-notifier
Hacker New Telegram Bot
https://github.com/lawxls/HackerNews-Alerts-Bot
HN Reply Notifier
https://github.com/lotsofnoise/hn-reply-notifier
And there have been Show HNs on them as well.
Show HN: I built an open-source notification inbox widget for Hacker News
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36373123
Show HN: HN Reader – Track your conversations across Hacker News
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46240221
I (and probably a lot of other HN users) built my own bespoke HN suite that notifies me on replies, stories that I might be interested in, etc. It just sits quietly on a VPS and sends messages to me over Signal. Never open-sourced it because the code is a dire abomination.
Yours is probably the first Chrome side-panel variation that I've seen though.
I was thinking allowing people to follow users so they get a stream of posts and comments from users they are interested in the side bar
You should just submit a PR to OJ.
https://github.com/OrangeJuiceExtension/OrangeJuice/issues/3
If one other person uses it, it is good enough for me.
If you use it and want more features, post in the issue queue or respond to one of my comments -- I'll get it.
The engine that makes the requests and does the logic is agnostic and probably is portable copy and paste into your project. The one thing I have are all the tests and red team adversary agents that do very well to surface bugs.
dvt•1h ago
scratchyone•1h ago
> A self-contained security audit prompt is available at docs/security-audit.md.
lmfao
dataviz1000•1h ago
To me the most interesting thing is the different red team adversary agents I'm using. There is a Jony Ive design critic agent which is surprisingly very good, a red team agent that does normal code review and bug hunting by injecting logging into the code running it in isolation in the /tmp/ folder, a red team agent that code reviews and find bugs in the test harnesses, and an agent that does mutation testing by breaking the code creating regressions to make sure that the test harness catch them -- I wanted to call it the trickster agent but did didn't want to drift from training and density in the LLM model.
I did a huge amount of experimentation last week discovering that if a model misses a bug or gets something wrong, running an adversary agent using the same model or family of models will not surface it. Everyone has the intuition about that but I can describe why using data. So Claude writes code that is orders of magnitude better than any project I inherited in the past 15 years and I'd have ChatGPT run all the adversaries.
In order to surface replies to posts and comments it requires huge amounts requests so I needed to figure out what the optimal request rate is based on frequency of replies over time. First posts get replies after a week so there isn't any reason to surface them. After analysis, I can conclude a request every 5 minutes in the background is enough. What is that 288 (pollComments) + 144 (author-sync) = 432 requests/day per user? I spent a couple hours on that. Actually, I started with the Hacker News API and then realized that I should check the https://hn.algolia.com/api but wanted to know which is optimal including using both. After experimentation and research I discovered that ~432 requests a day at Algolia is enough.