I wonder what it's like being a spokesperson for a company (or administration) where everyone including yourself knows your statements are misleading at best.
Whereas it seems this might be a situation where the situation is actually inverse: being paid enough to not care.
Americans can’t even agree on persecuting pedophiles, what makes you think they can agree on a clear loss of privacy for the normies that only people in power will only benefit from?
It’s all exhausting
Signal and Threema seem to be known for good UX and viability as everyday messengers.
There was this table: https://www.messenger-matrix.de/messenger-matrix-en.html
- just better ad targeting? (lol if so)
- policing accounts for various possible infractions?
- training data for ML models?
It also feels like the wide-scale desperate adoption of AI has weakened claims about the essential nature of privacy, now that everyone has demonstrated that they are happy to feed their innermost thoughts, secrets, personal conflicts, code, medical records, legal documents, etc. into cloud AI platforms.
https://lifehacker.com/tech/meta-is-not-scraping-dms-to-trai...
> The best thing you can do to preserve your privacy and security with your Meta messages is to use end-to-end encryption (E2EE) whenever possible. WhatsApp has E2EE built-in, and Meta has automatically started rolling it out for Messenger, but you might need to manually start an E2EE chat for existing conversations in the app. The same goes for Instagram: Meta offers E2EE, but you need to enable it yourself. In either app, tap the name of the chat to check whether or not that conversation is currently E2EE.
I really don't understand what the point of the quote you're citing? Or how it goes against what I was saying?
The best thing you can do would be to use E2EE. That would be the most secure thing. It won't, however, prevent the makers of your E2EE product from reading the messages once they're unencrypted, regardless of who makes it.
There is no reason for unencrypted messaging.
This is a fundamental market failure.
It is only through bundling these messaging services with other services + platform dominance that unencrypted messaging still lives.
Many people do, e.g. by switching from Whatsapp to Telegram.
The market is working alright; people are (uninformedly) voting with their wallets (or rather, their personal data).
Unencrypted messaging is easier and more convenient, just login from anywhere and done. So there are actual technical and rational reasons to choose against e2e.
cdrnsf•1h ago
nickburns•1h ago
jckahn•1h ago
chabes•1h ago
nickburns•1h ago
towers•44m ago
rapnie•1h ago
roughly•1h ago
lxgr•42m ago
giancarlostoro•39m ago
bsimpson•26m ago
That grew into the Messenger mobile app. They eventually added private messaging, but it was never popular/defaulted because users expected the chat moles on facebook.com to be able to show the same messages as the mobile app. If facebook.com can't read your messages, it can't show them there.