[1] - https://www.landscapeforms.com/ideas/bug-rating-system-101
SpaceX wants investors to think that they will be able to launch millions of satellites.
1: https://officechai.com/stories/spacex-launched-85-of-all-glo... 2: https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2024/05/spacex-launching-87-90...
Amazon Leo plans for 3,000 satellites in orbit, and is already launching satellites.
China's state-backed starlink competitor GuoWang is putting 13,000 satellites in orbit by 2030. They've already started launching satellites.
China's Qianfan plans 15,000 satellites by 2030.
AST SpaceMobile is building their own network.
The EU is building EU: IRIS², explicitly as a Starlink alternative.
Russia, after realizing how critical starlink is on the battlefield, is planning its own Rassvet network. They've already launched satellites.
Spec Priority: ability to attach said laser defense instrument to home telescope ... and enable user to blast those madafakkas out of the sky.
A little more destructive pushing suns into supernova to write "Coke is Life" across the sky.
Watch This Space - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venture_to_the_Moon
This article seems to confuse Starlink with ordinary cellular communications
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome
Sorry Buck Rogers fan bois, should have left this fantasy in the 1950s...
Which by the way, is not a hard number to beat... Biden's BEAD connected exactly 0 people at the cost of $42 billion dollars.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadband_Equity,_Access,_and_...
Incidentally, BEAD includes LEO satellites as part of it. SpaceX got grants from it. (https://texasstandard.org/stories/spacex-demands-changes-fed...)
https://www.ntia.gov/press-release/2026/assistant-secretary-...
Of course, it's possible nobody actually wants to do this, they just want to get funded to do it. (Old joke: "I wish I had enough money to buy an elephant...")
Some previous discussion:
A million new SpaceX satellites will destroy the night sky
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47598415
Part of this announcement:
xAI joins SpaceX
codingdave•1h ago
Really? I wonder how they are going to get them up there without rocket launches?
Ekaros•1h ago
JPLeRouzic•1h ago
aruggirello•1h ago
johnea•5m ago
Regardless of how they fall, they still fall on the planet.
And this still ignores the massive atmospheric pollution of chemical rocket launch.
Space elevator would be a big help with launch, but the trash is still dropped on the ground, or in the ocean, in the end.
ReptileMan•1h ago
codingdave•1h ago
When I worked in a midstream gas company, I recall a meeting when we were explaining the business to some new IT folk, and talking about the plants that process 100K barrels. One new guy in particular literally dropped his jaw and said, "you process 100K barrels of gas a year??" The room looked at him like he was insane and the woman running the meeting politely replied: "No, per day."
So acting as if "it burns less than a power plant" somehow means it is trivial is just a really odd take.
Besides, the methane burn is one piece of the puzzle. There is more to environmental impact than just methane.
ReptileMan•52m ago
vkou•59m ago
Look into what percentage of the ISS by weight is radiators, look into how little power it can generate and radiate, and you'll see that space data centers is the shitcoin pitch of 2026.
kingleopold•52m ago
ericd•13m ago