I know doing that would be crazy, but Companies keep trying and trying until it is passed.
Tin Fol hat time: It almost looks like it is a way to funnel Political Contributions (bribes) to the politicians. The politicians fail the bill because they felt they did not get enough Contributions :)
I think the topic itself is difficult for everyone involved - there will likely be a lot of uproar for many years as we get closer to finding this happy medium.
josefritzishere•59m ago
jauntywundrkind•51m ago
Meanwhile personal computing is being savagely destroyed, as consumer channels to ram and storage disappear.
It's so bad. These people need to be punished. This is so so so unacceptable and the forces for state intrusion into all digital systems and pervasive survelliance have gotten so so so far in the past couple years.
AlanYx•48m ago
Both (i) and (ii) have led the government to this dark place, thinking they're doing good.
Izikiel43•39m ago
You can summarize a lot of government actions of any spectrum with: "The road to hell is full of good intentions"
dmitrygr•27m ago
I'll take the other end of the bet claiming that they think they are doing good. I am pretty sure they know what they are doing full well, and it ain't good.
AlanYx•11m ago
That being said, C-22 goes way beyond what would be halfway reasonable to solve the main issues in a fair and rights-respecting way, and I have absolutely no sympathy for the reasoning and goals imported from the UK's Online Safety Act.
fidotron•37m ago
themafia•13m ago
There's an exceptional amount of money to be had in creating the new digital feudal state.
Given that most everyday digital technology is in the hands of a few powerful monopolies they feel they have the opportunity to actually pull this off.