frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

The newest Instagram “exploit” is the goofiest I've seen

https://www.0xsid.com/blog/meta-account-takeover-fiasco
1284•ssiddharth•8h ago•316 comments

Age verification for social media, the beginning of the end for a free internet?

https://mullvad.net/en/blog/age-verification-for-social-media-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-a-free...
34•StrLght•1h ago•17 comments

OpenAI frontier models and Codex are now available on AWS

https://openai.com/index/openai-frontier-models-and-codex-are-now-available-on-aws/
93•typpo•3h ago•33 comments

Debug Project

https://debug.com/
139•Eridanus2•4h ago•64 comments

Can the stockmarket swallow Anthropic, SpaceX and OpenAI?

https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2026/06/01/can-the-stockmarket-swallow-anthropic-...
18•1vuio0pswjnm7•1h ago•25 comments

AI Agent Guidelines for CS336 at Stanford

https://github.com/stanford-cs336/assignment1-basics/blob/main/CLAUDE.md
312•prakashqwerty•8h ago•112 comments

Should you normalize RGB values by 255 or 256?

https://30fps.net/pages/255-vs-256-division/
181•pplanu•7h ago•80 comments

CS336: Language Modeling from Scratch

https://cs336.stanford.edu/
349•kristianpaul•10h ago•42 comments

A new way to build chips: Sequentially stacking silicon to extend Moore's Law

https://matse.illinois.edu/news/85775
12•hhs•2d ago•1 comments

GrapheneOS Speech Services version 2 released

https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/36001-grapheneos-speech-services-version-2-released
93•pretext•6h ago•14 comments

What appear to be biochemical processes may be a natural feature of geology

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-dirt-that-refused-to-die-20260601/
188•speckx•9h ago•62 comments

Microsoft builds MacBook Pro rival with NVIDIA-powered Surface Laptop Ultra

https://www.windowslatest.com/2026/06/01/microsoft-builds-its-ultimate-macbook-pro-rival-with-the...
131•jbk•12h ago•326 comments

Stealing from Biologists to Compile Haskell Faster

https://www.iankduncan.com/engineering/2026-05-30-stealing-from-biologists-to-compile-haskell-fas...
92•mooreds•2d ago•4 comments

What's gonna happen to software engineers?

https://yakko.dev/blog/whats-gonna-happen-to-software-developers
4•yakkomajuri•35m ago•0 comments

Nvidia RTX Spark

https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/products/rtx-spark/
318•shenli3514•19h ago•261 comments

Ask HN: Who is hiring? (June 2026)

152•whoishiring•9h ago•224 comments

I made my phone slow on purpose

https://vinewallapp.com/notes/i-made-my-phone-slow-on-purpose/
165•gcampos•4d ago•146 comments

Launch HN: Expanse (YC P26) – Unlock Wasted GPU Capacity

68•ismaeel_bashir•11h ago•20 comments

Alphabet announces $80B equity capital raise to expand AI infra and compute

https://abc.xyz/investor/news/news-details/2026/Alphabet-Announces-Proposed-80-Billion-Equity-Cap...
91•gregschlom•4h ago•93 comments

The Frame Problem (2004)

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frame-problem/
9•rzk•1h ago•2 comments

Ask HN: Who wants to be hired? (June 2026)

90•whoishiring•9h ago•264 comments

Anthropic confidentially submits draft S-1 to the SEC

https://www.anthropic.com/news/confidential-draft-s1-sec
445•surprisetalk•8h ago•356 comments

Windows GOG DOS Games on M-Series Macs

https://f055.net/technology/windows-gog-dos-games-on-m-series-macs/
138•f055•11h ago•79 comments

Only 17% of all 64-bit Integers are products of two 32-bit integers

https://lemire.me/blog/2026/05/22/only-17-of-all-64-bit-integers-are-products-of-two-32-bit-integ...
195•sebg•4d ago•91 comments

Flipper Zero Zig Template

https://github.com/NishantJoshi00/flipper-template
127•Nars088•11h ago•9 comments

Malicious npm packages detected across Red Hat Cloud Services

https://github.com/RedHatInsights/javascript-clients/issues/492
723•kurmiashish•11h ago•405 comments

Show HN: DepsGuard – One command to harden NPM/pnpm/yarn/bun/uv configs

https://github.com/arnica/depsguard
10•eranation•7h ago•0 comments

The Pirate Bay Remains Resilient, 20 Years After the Raid

https://torrentfreak.com/the-pirate-bay-remains-resilient-20-years-after-the-raid/
495•speckx•10h ago•245 comments

GitHub and the crime against software

https://eblog.fly.dev/githubbad.html
195•pplanu•6h ago•88 comments

Handmade Hawaiian Islands Map

https://www.notesfromtheroad.com/roam/hawaiian-islands-map.html
55•bovermyer•2d ago•17 comments
Open in hackernews

OpenAI frontier models and Codex are now available on AWS

https://openai.com/index/openai-frontier-models-and-codex-are-now-available-on-aws/
93•typpo•3h ago

Comments

Handy-Man•1h ago
More expensive than directly sourcing from OpenAI
BoredPositron•1h ago
It's for people that can easily pump their AWS bill but not a new vendor.
easton•1h ago
The AWS pricing page says 10% more than OpenAI, which is probably because they’re forcing all inference through the US and data residency is at a 10% premium from the model vendors for whatever reason (because you’ll pay for it).

If they put in a global endpoint like with Claude (or OpenAI directly) then it’ll probably match the direct pricing, if the pattern holds.

(https://aws.amazon.com/bedrock/pricing/, scroll to OpenAI)

sokoloff•57m ago
It also could be to provide room for enterprise discount pricing without it being money-losing for one of the companies.
yojo•38m ago
I have worked at places that have negotiated flat percentage discounts on all AWS spend.

This explanation seems plausible to me.

cebert•34m ago
It’s even more expensive for GovCloud customers. We pay a 30% premium on top of that.
chews•1h ago
It's like OpenAI can't help themselves from failing hard.
hmartin•1h ago
Wish I could fail hard enough to have a (nearly) $1T startup with some of both the smartest models and smartest people.
dzbarsky•1h ago
Care to elaborate how OpenAI is failing in your opinion?
_pdp_•1h ago
As usual the more options the better for everyone. While this is not a direct replacement it is good that it exists.
Aurornis•1h ago
If you are wondering why anyone would spend more money to use these APIs through AWS instead of going direct: In some companies it’s nearly impossible to get new vendors approved. If the company has an AWS contract then you have to use what AWS offers.
powvans•51m ago
Even if you can get it approved you are adding surface area to your annual security audits, adding another vendor that needs to be disclosed on security assessments, spreading your data to yet another processor, and adding another invoice and budget discussion. Depending on your customer contracts you may need to notify them of a new vendor. This might trigger a new security review. Oh it’s just another model on Bedrock? Bliss.
ykl•1h ago
If you've used AI coding models in a large corporate setting, you'll know that a lot of big corporate deployments basically require using AWS Bedrock for two simple reasons:

1. Large companies tend to already have an existing relationship with AWS, which makes things way easier to go through vs. setting up a new vendor relationship 2. Large companies tend to have strong internal requirements about making sure that internal data stays under company control. With AWS Bedrock, you can be a lot more confident that what you're feeding into the models is not going to end up in someone's training set somewhere. For where I work, this requirement is a dealbreaker for going directly through OpenAI's API instead of going through AWS Bedrock.

rho138•57m ago
How is one certain bedrock data isn’t being shuttled to external providers?
cortesoft•54m ago
Contracts and the force of law?
ai_fry_ur_brain•49m ago
Which notoriously are always holding the largest corporations accountable /s
SOLAR_FIELDS•31m ago
Actually yes, when it’s other huge corporations holding them accountable. It’s only when politicians who are much more cheaply bought get involved that creates problems. When the other side has a significant war chest to combat you with, suddenly behavior improves
phillipcarter•54m ago
Absolutely huge news for OpenAI. Unimaginable amount of enterprises picked up Claude just because it was available in AWS, and now there's serious competition.
AgentOrange1234•20m ago
This is great news. I wish they were keeping their other models updated. With Gemma 4 and Qwen 3.7 already available on OpenRouter, bedrock is just not keeping up at all.
2001zhaozhao•17m ago
Good news for competition.

Claude Code keeps omitting new features from people using it through Amazon Bedrock (e.g. auto mode, ultra plan, Claude for Chrome). Hopefully some more competition can get them to rethink their strategy.

ch4s3•23m ago
Any sufficiently large company will be prepared to fight this out in court where Amazon would eventually lose.
harrall•9m ago
Laws and rules don’t hold anyone accountable. Anyone can say anything and then break that trust the next second.

Instead you trust your best friend because you have known them for 15 years and seen them in enough situations. It’s long term observation and predictability they ultimately gives trust.

AWS has been around 20 years and has never once shown a sign that that they would sell customer data. Could they still try? Sure, in the same way they my friend who hates seafood his entire life could suddenly flip 180 and love it. Yeah I guess it’s possible.

avianlyric•50m ago
Contractual obligation, external third party audits, and above all, AWS’s reputation.

AWS isn’t going to risk their reputation, and thus huge chunks of their business, just so a few AI labs can get some extra training data. That’s an insane risk with zero upside for AWS. AWS knows full well they will make insane quantities of cash without breaking legal contracts with companies who pay them billions each year for infra.

jofzar•49m ago
What other people are saying, but also because Amazon does not want to fuck around in this space. They don't want the legal fight or the reputational damage that would come with it.
trollbridge•21m ago
They also don't really stand to benefit from doing so, unlike basically everyone else in this space.

They have access to a ridiculous amount of private customer data and so far have not shown any predilection to misusing that access.

xingped•16m ago
To take an easy example that has actually had lawsuits I can link to, you must be unfamiliar with the lawsuits against Amazon for misusing sellers' data in order to undercut them with their own products... https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/13-bln-uk-lawsuit-acc...

There's zero reason to "trust" Amazon about anything. (And yes, I know the retail and AWS sides of the company are different, but it's still the same company. The same rot is always there, just shuffled around.)

bijowo1676•7m ago
this is not related to AWS, but merely to amazon's retail business and their sellers know and sign up for the deal when they sell via amazon.

every single retail company does this, they allow suppliers to sell the product using retails's infrastructure, and then retailer turns around and create private label products using sales data (Costco's Kirkland Signature, Walmart's Great Value, are just some examples)

fragmede•2m ago
Yes, but Kirkland's signature comes from the same factory. If I'm the factory owner and Costco vis going to guarantee me sales albeit at a slightly lower margin, so long as I slap a different sticker on it, that's different than from Amazon finding out which of my products sells best and then gets someone else to rip it off so I don't get paid anything.
650REDHAIR•30m ago
Bezos and Altman pinky-promised and are super trustworthy.
azinman2•6m ago
Seems like trusting AWS with your data has been a good bet for a long time. They wouldn’t have the size/scale otherwise.
SXX•36s ago
Bezos is not in AI gold rush. AWS is shovel rental.

Also unlike Altman they are trustworthy - a lot of Amazon competitors do run on AWS for decades.

nh2•26m ago
In contrast to Microsoft, OpenAI, and Anthropic, AWS has never done anything close to sneaking in unwanted training opt-outs after the fact.

They are the only ones I trust not to do that so far. And their terms are extremely clear on that, no fuzzy language. Exactly what we want to see. So we use Bedrock.

Eridrus•8m ago
To go a step further, the reason it's often impossible to add a new vendor if that you've signed a bunch of contracts with your customers saying you're not going to send their data to other vendors in all sorts of various flavors.