frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

LuaJIT 3.0 proposed syntax extensions

https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1475
66•phreddypharkus•1h ago•32 comments

OpenAI unveils its first custom chip, built by Broadcom

https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/24/openai-unveils-its-first-custom-chip-built-by-broadcom/
554•jamdesk•8h ago•340 comments

Blogging can just be stating the obvious

https://blog.jim-nielsen.com/2026/blogging-stating-the-obvious/
84•Curiositry•2h ago•35 comments

Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/anthropic-says-alibaba-illicitly-extracted-claude-ai-model-ca...
85•htrp•6h ago•146 comments

Bible as RAG Database

https://www.crosscanon.com/
28•jacksonastone•56m ago•13 comments

Ending All Respiratory Infections

https://blog.interceptfund.com/p/ending-respiratory-infections
29•EthanFantl•1h ago•10 comments

Dostoyevsky isn't difficult

https://www.autodidacts.io/dostoyevsky-isnt-difficult/
45•surprisetalk•2d ago•38 comments

Exploring the internal representations of Pangram 3.3.2

https://www.pangram.com/pangram-space
9•krackers•1h ago•1 comments

Qualcomm to Acquire Modular

https://www.reuters.com/business/qualcomm-buy-ai-startup-modular-2026-06-24/
151•timmyd•12h ago•37 comments

RubyLLM: A Ruby framework for all major AI providers

https://rubyllm.com/
348•doener•11h ago•56 comments

Mixing Visual and Textual Code

https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15855
8•doppioandante•1h ago•0 comments

Computer use in Gemini 3.5 Flash

https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/introducing-computer-use-...
179•swolpers•9h ago•108 comments

PR spam today looks like email spam in the early 2000s

https://www.greptile.com/blog/prs-on-openclaw
183•dakshgupta•12h ago•102 comments

45°C cooling design cuts data center water use to near zero

https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/liquid-cooling-ai-factories/
205•nitin_flanker•12h ago•157 comments

GLM-5.2 is a step change for open agents

https://www.interconnects.ai/p/glm-52-is-the-step-change-for-open
135•vantareed•1d ago•74 comments

The Xteink X4 E-Ink Reader

https://blog.omgmog.net/post/xteink-x4-e-ink-reader/
180•felixdoerp•10h ago•109 comments

Crawling BitTorrent DHTs for Fun and Profit [pdf]

https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/woot10/tech/full_papers/Wolchok.pdf
69•dgellow•3d ago•26 comments

Writers and Drugs

https://lithub.com/are-writers-intrinsically-vulnerable-to-alcohol-and-drugs/
3•dang•49m ago•1 comments

Elastic lays off 7% of employees

https://www.elastic.co/blog/ceo-ash-kulkarni-announcement-to-elastic-employees
139•dakrone•4h ago•132 comments

Show HN: Nub – A Bun-like all-in-one toolkit for Node.js

https://github.com/nubjs/nub
205•colinmcd•12h ago•59 comments

There are a few things that I look back on as my mistakes in the early days

https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/2069799283369345247
496•shadowtree•10h ago•245 comments

Show HN: Wordit – Change One Letter, Keep the Chain Going

https://victorribeiro.com/wordit/
9•atum47•1d ago•11 comments

Krea 2: SOTA open-weights 12B image model

https://www.krea.ai/blog/krea-2-technical-report
346•mattnewton•1d ago•37 comments

Matt's Script Archive: The Scripts That Reshaped the Web

https://tedium.co/2026/06/22/matts-script-archive-retrospective/
12•1317•2d ago•6 comments

Stealing Is a Skill

https://ben-mini.com/2026/stealing-is-a-skill
216•bewal416•13h ago•131 comments

A Practical Guide to SSH Tunnels: Local and Remote Port Forwarding

https://labs.iximiuz.com/tutorials/ssh-tunnels
283•signa11•4d ago•57 comments

I can haz smoller NixOS ISOs?

https://natkr.com/2026-06-19-nixos-but-smol/
83•logickkk1•5d ago•27 comments

MSc Thesis – The Limits of Generalized Sync

https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/server/api/core/bitstreams/d485ca46-ef01-41bc-ae4c-d468afb209a8/content
6•bebraw•21h ago•5 comments

How the Fifth Lateran Council unlocked financial theory

https://sebastiangarren.com/2026/06/17/lending-is-meritorious-and-should-be-praised-how-the-fifth...
55•momentmaker•4d ago•9 comments

We’re making Bunny DNS free

https://bunny.net/blog/were-making-bunny-dns-free/
856•dabinat•17h ago•256 comments
Open in hackernews

Dostoyevsky isn't difficult

https://www.autodidacts.io/dostoyevsky-isnt-difficult/
45•surprisetalk•2d ago

Comments

david927•2d ago
I also stumbled onto Crime and Punishment at 18 and expected it to be difficult and was blown away with how Dostoyevsky wrote one of the greatest novels of all time, to be sure, but as the author here says, also how engaging he made it.

The scene where he commits the crime is an absolute stunner, edge-of-your-seat, thriller. Who does that? Who can pull that off? Dostoyevsky

NoMoreNicksLeft•1h ago
Dunno. I can't read Russian for shit (pre-kindergarten level, I'd guess), but it seems like cheating to read it in English.
SamBam•1h ago
I can't imagine how much amazing and important literature you'd miss if you were snobby enough to think that you could only read things in their original language.

I'm so glad I get to read the Russians and Kafka and Calvino and Murakami and Camus and Marquez and Homer and Plato and, heck, the Bible.

I do know the feeling. I struggled through the start of My Brilliant Friend because I ought to read it in Italian, because I speak it pretty well. So then I didn't read it for years. Finally I just read it in English and enjoyed myself.

TimorousBestie•57m ago
Aww, I loved My Brilliant Friend (but I've never studied Italian at all, it was translation or nothing for me).
analog31•30m ago
A translation is by necessity a work of both the author and the translator. There have been some amazing pairings such as Kafka translated by Edwin and Willa Muir. I don't think a translation necessarily diminishes the original work or the reader.
crypttales•7m ago
I know the feeling. Reading Don Quixote in English would be cheating.

Then again, so would reading Shakespeare in Spanish - even though I'm more comfortable reading in eng, I'm better in Spanish than i am 500 year old English

ivlad•1h ago
Dostoyevsky was originally published in magazines chapter by chapter, so he would end the December’s on a cliffhanger so that the readers re-subscribed
dang•16m ago
You've touched on my favorite Dostoevsky anecdote! https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21152240.

A lot of 19th century novels were published as serials. The TV of their time I suppose.

With the final installment arriving by ship, crowds in New York shouted from the pier "Is Little Nell dead?" - https://www.charlesdickenspage.com/charles-dickens-old-curio...

olvy0•2d ago
Funny, I'm just reading War and Peace myself (the Anthony Briggs translation) and having the same reaction, gushing occasionally to people I know how approachable it is, and how darkly funny and modern it feels. Well, at least after passing through the first ~200 pages which are a slog. I didn't find even Tolstoy's historical musings boring, although he tends to repeat himself. And I usually suck at names, but the main characters are done so well I find them easy to remember. There aren't that many important ones despite how it seems at the start. It also serves as a fascinating peek into the daily lives of Russians of all stripes in the early 1800s.

I also had the same reaction to Crime and Punishment as the OP did.

user3939382•1h ago
Read those first 200 pages 10x could never get past it. 300 characters with names that I’ll never remember, some woman and her son, a general or something. A guy that keeps saying “Capital!”, standing around at parties.

I’m sure it’s good but I don’t think I have it in me to try again.

stevenwoo•49m ago
I swear it took me six retries to make it past the start. But if you have six hours the BBC adaptation is pretty good IMHO and captures many of the essentials of the book if not all the details. The show made me cry and the book did not have the same effect but maybe that was because it focused on certain aspects. I particularly remember the combat scenes in the book would have been difficult to match - the prose capturing the chaos and randomness of brutality in the neighborhood of D Day landing in Saving Private Ryan but with horse cavalry charges and cannon fire.
ks2048•1h ago
This rings a bell, because I decided to tackle Don Quixote (English translation). At 200 pages in (of around 1000, I think), it’s funny and entertaining and feels fresh.
stevenwoo•27m ago
Many of the subplots have been reused for entire romance movies, and lots of the mini adventures would not be out of place in something like Its Always Sunny in Philadelphia, as odd as that sounds.
blueblazin•1h ago
Not difficult, just boring.
sharts•1h ago
IMO The Russians were always more of a joy to read than English and Americans
_doctor_love•1h ago
A read I enjoyed in college was Ada, or Ardor by Nabokov.
rayiner•1h ago
No, too much emotion.
_doctor_love•1h ago
"I never got into the Russians, they take too long getting to the feckin' point!"

"Oh? Not even Dostoyevsky?"

"Oh come on now, he was the main offender."

- The Guard

archonis•1h ago
Sometime in the 90s we started getting really good Dostoyevsky translations, and they make a huge difference.
carabiner•1h ago
LMAO he's saying russian lit is readable when using the most bastardized, westernized translations available, Garnet. That was the point of her work and what P&V sought to rectify when they put out their vastly more faithful renditions.
enthdegree•1h ago
From the circles I am exposed to Pevear and Volokhonsky's translations are not seen as the most natural ones (although they are the only ones I have read because of the cool abstract paperback covers). I have heard they miss anecdotes and humor in favor of word accuracy. Characters are always "twisting their mouth" and similar. I'm looking forward to re-reading Demons in some other translation. He might have been well served by Garnett.
mikrl•1h ago
The death of Ivan Ilyich by Tolstoy is bleak, humane and fairly short. I enjoyed it like a good Charles Dickens
stevenwoo•59m ago
One thing is a lot of common television/movie tropes are instantly recognizable in one form or another in there, the murder in Crime and Punishment is a series of coincidences and lucky timing for him to initially get away with it that would not be out of place in modern thriller or comedy. I had the same issue with the names so I took notes and bookmarked the Wikipedia page for the books to refresh my memory of whom was whom until it stuck. Audiobooks (most of the russian classics are free from my local library)help a lot with the pronunciation if one is like the writer and pattern matches names - hearing them a few times initially is very helpful. Side note - not a sea person but only from audiobooks learned i didn’t know how to pronounce English words boatswain, gunwale and forecastle.
nine_k•45m ago
Crime and Punishment is a bona fide detective story / crime novel, and can be enjoyed as such.
dang•13m ago
One of my professors, so long ago that I can't remember which, said it was not a who-dun-it but a why-dun-it.

The murder scene itself is so vivid that it's easy to forget that the long middle of the novel is the cat-and-mouse game between him and the detective whose name I forget.

simpaticoder•41m ago
What disginguishes Dostoevsky is his attention to detail and this unusual ability to describe someone inside and out with a voice that finds some sort of intrinsic fascination with the person no matter how dark, dingy, flawed, or just plain strange they are. It's like he withholds judgement without being clinical. His writing is peppered with these sketches, filled with insight, and it's not just a still-life - he manages to weave in these character studies with action and interaction. Most of us look out and see a lawn, boring and inert. He looks out and sees a lawn comprised of individual blades of grass, growing in soil of a specific kind, some weeds, cut some time ago, insects striving and fighting and dying and reproducing, the effects of weather and sun and shade making microclimates from which whole communities of life escape from or to....if there is anything to learn from him it is his gorgeous attention to details that we know are there but have long since ceased bothering to note.
Barrin92•56m ago
He isn't difficult but I always thought Nabokov (in his fairly incendiary reviews http://wmjas.wikidot.com/nabokov-s-recommendations) was on point that he was sentimental, preachy and mediocre as an artist.

I found Dostoyevsky a slog to get through and it might have been made worse because he was sold to me as this 'great psychologist' when psychological realism is often missing from his stories and characters become page-long megaphones for some version of Orthodox Russian nationalism or Christianity.

tyjen•56m ago
War and Peace is one of those books I've reread every decade since I was a teenager. It's one of my favorite novels because, as I've matured and moved through different stages of life, the parts that resonate with me change significantly. Each rereading feels like encountering a different book, not because the words have changed, but because my own life experiences have shaped what draws my attention.

I'm sure many books offer this experience, but War and Peace explores the human condition across a lifetime in a way few novels do.

waynecochran•53m ago
I have never read a book I hated more than The Brothers Karamazov. I never read a book that depressed me more than Crime and Punishment. No more Dostoevsky for me.
dang•15m ago
You and Nabokov.

Edit: except for The Double.

gaiagraphia•33m ago
Lol, remember being in my early 20s on a train and trying to read Crime and Punishhment, and just kept skipping random 5 pages here and there, before going back to playing Durak with some random Tajiks (who got kicked off the train in some random place...). The huge pages of French didn't help.

Prefered Demons, personally. Probably becuase I read it when more mature.

still-learning•15m ago
I thoroughly enjoyed Crime and Punishment, The Idiot, and White Nights, but I'm finding myself slogging through Karamazov. I'm about 600 pages in and its picking up at least. Banking on it all being worth it in the end. Normally I subscribe to the quote "life's too short to read a bad book", but making an exception for Dostoyevsky.
crypttales•10m ago
Karamazov is amazing.

But if you're 600 pages in and it's a slog you might have lost the train of thought of the novel.

It is a lot to keep in your head!

still-learning•2m ago
Yeah I've picked it up and put it down multiple times over the past year, might have had some context loss. Theres been a few very lucid monologues I've enjoyed, but I haven't felt the same level of internal revelation as the previous novels.
yalue•7m ago
I had the same experience, lol. I started with Crime and Punishment expecting thinly veiled philosophy where each character is a mouthpiece for one of the author's thought processes. Granted there's some of that, but I wasn't expecting such an exciting murder drama. Went into Karamazov expecting an exciting murder drama, and got the type of Russian literature I initially expected Crime and Punishment to be! Really it's a question of expectations.
functionmouse•9m ago
Shoutout to The Gambler
CalChris•7m ago
I liked The Possessed by Elif Batuman. I had read The Idiot in high school, a death march for a term paper. But I liked Batuman's reading of it better than mine (but not enough to re-read it).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elif_Batuman

dang•6m ago
As I've said at least once before: come back, pvg!

If ever we needed you...