frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

.self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

https://hccf.onmy.cloud/2026/06/21/reclaiming-our-digital-selves-hccfs-vision-for-a-human-centere...
203•HumanCCF•3h ago•131 comments

Qwen 3.6 27B is the sweet spot for local development

https://quesma.com/blog/qwen-36-is-awesome/
509•stared•5h ago•444 comments

Free the Icons

https://weblog.rogueamoeba.com/2026/06/26/free-the-icons/
74•zdw•2d ago•12 comments

Is It Out Yet?

https://outyet.ai
26•partsch•1h ago•10 comments

Rocketlab acquires Iridium

https://investors.rocketlabcorp.com/news-releases/news-release-details/rocket-lab-acquire-iridium...
332•everfrustrated•8h ago•203 comments

Ornith-1.0: self-improving open-source models for agentic coding

https://github.com/deepreinforce-ai/Ornith-1
125•danboarder•5h ago•27 comments

Scientists find molecular-level evidence for two structures in liquid water

https://phys.org/news/2026-06-scientists-molecular-evidence-liquid.html
9•wglb•41m ago•1 comments

A native graphical shell for SSH

https://probablymarcus.com/blocks/2026/06/28/native-graphical-shell-for-SSH.html
211•mrcslws•7h ago•96 comments

WATaBoy: JIT-Ing Game Boy Instructions to WASM Beats a Native Interpreter

https://humphri.es/blog/WATaBoy/
163•energeticbark•7h ago•24 comments

Wallace the 6 inch f/2.8 telescope, building it, and hiking with it

https://lucassifoni.info/blog/hiking-with-wallace/
89•chantepierre•3d ago•13 comments

JumpServer: Open-Source Privileged Access Management

https://github.com/jumpserver/jumpserver
44•neitsab•3h ago•11 comments

US Supreme Court rules geofence warrants require constitutional protections

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/29/supreme-court-geofence-warrants-case-decision
373•cdrnsf•7h ago•174 comments

Micro-Agent: Beat Frontier Models with Collaboration Inside Model API

https://vllm.ai/blog/2026-06-29-micro-agent-frontier-models
40•matt_d•4h ago•11 comments

What happens when you run a CUDA kernel?

https://fergusfinn.com/blog/what-happens-when-you-run-a-gpu-kernel/
190•mezark•9h ago•24 comments

Apple Neural Engine: Architecture, Programming, and Performance

https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22283
77•Jimmc414•1d ago•9 comments

Working With AI: A concrete example

https://htmx.org/essays/working-with-ai/
61•comma_at•8h ago•23 comments

South Korea to spend $1T on more memory chip production and humanoid robots

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/south-korea-to-spend-1t-on-more-memory-chip-production-and-hum...
16•jnord•38m ago•0 comments

30-year sentence for transporting zines is a five-alarm fire for free speech

https://theintercept.com/2026/06/26/daniel-sanchez-estrada-zines-prairieland-free-speech/
160•xrd•1d ago•64 comments

Ornith-1.0: Self-scaffolding LLMs for agentic coding

https://deep-reinforce.com/ornith_1_0.html
47•kordlessagain•1d ago•6 comments

European ISPs Want Rightsholders Held Accountable for Overblocking Damage

https://torrentfreak.com/european-isps-want-rightsholders-held-accountable-for-overblocking-damage/
319•Brajeshwar•6h ago•83 comments

Dark Sky Lighting

https://www.savingourstars.org/darkskylighting#whatisdarkskylighting
118•alexandrehtrb•4d ago•16 comments

One million passports leaked online

https://cambridgeanalytica.org/data-breaches-scandals/passports-driver-licenses-exposed-public-in...
81•jruohonen•1d ago•54 comments

Sandia National Labs SA3000 8085 CPU

https://www.cpushack.com/2026/06/03/sandia-national-labs-sa3000-8085-cpu/
151•rbanffy•12h ago•38 comments

You Don't Know Jack About Formal Verification

https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3819084
84•eatonphil•8h ago•37 comments

Font-Family Recommendations

https://chrismorgan.info/font-family
41•birdculture•3d ago•12 comments

Venetian Bridge Brawls in 17th and 18th Century Art

https://publicdomainreview.org/collection/venice-bridge-fights/
50•pepys•3d ago•28 comments

Rebuilding the Computer Room

https://alexwlchan.net/2026/computer-room/
87•ingve•11h ago•45 comments

Is sunscreen the new margarine? (2019)

https://www.outsideonline.com/health/wellness/sunscreen-sun-exposure-skin-cancer-science/
57•markgavalda•17h ago•56 comments

Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron Sued in US over Memory Price Fixing

https://en.sedaily.com/international/2026/06/29/samsung-sk-hynix-micron-sued-in-us-over-memory-pr...
322•donohoe•11h ago•156 comments

Halvar's Guide to Entrepreneurship

https://thomasdullien.github.io/guides/entrepreneurship/
191•nekitamo•4d ago•44 comments
Open in hackernews

Is sunscreen the new margarine? (2019)

https://www.outsideonline.com/health/wellness/sunscreen-sun-exposure-skin-cancer-science/
57•markgavalda•17h ago

Comments

SilverElfin•15h ago
It’s great that people are finally talking about this. It should have been obvious that sun exposure without sunscreen is needed to some extent. If you’re blocking the UV all the time, then how could you possibly be getting the minimum UV exposure that you do need. But people have become absolutely obsessed with sun protection.
flyingshelf•14h ago
I don't know of anyone using sunscreen from the moment they wake up until they go to sleep. Guaranteed that even the best user will still receive a healthy amount of UV even if they refresh every few hours. As far as I'm concerned sunscreen is a 10am-5pm endeavor, not needed before or after
Zenbit_UX•14h ago
Worth noting here for any readers new to UV guidelines that the above rule isn’t necessarily helpful for you. I’m currently traveling in an area that is 8:30am-4:30pm and live in an area that’s 10-6 pm in the summer and shifts throughout the year.

The actual rule is derived from your location’s safe UV index zones, which is found out by determining what local time the UV Index <= 2. Above 2, wear some amount of protection.

sevenseacat•12h ago
That's basically sun up to sun down, here.

It's been completely grey, overcast, and raining here all day and the UV index sat between 3 and 5.

Zenbit_UX•10h ago
Ya, the relationship between UV and sunlight is strange and unintuitive. For that reason I use a UV widget on my lock screen.

I find that being exposed to the value (e.g. 4) while being able to see the suns effect (e.g. cloudy) gives me a better feel for conditions.

flyingshelf•4h ago
The worst sunburn I ever got was on a boat while overcast. I don't trust them clouds no more.
plorkyeran•1h ago
Clouds block a decent amount of UV on average, but it’s much less consistent than you might expect. 9/10 you might be completely fine with no sunscreen and then get a horrible sunburn the tenth, with no apparent visual distinction between them.
rcxdude•14h ago
Sunscreen isn't a 100% block, though. In fact it's advertised by what proportion of the UV it blocks. And in general it's far more common to have too much sun exposure than too little, and in the areas where people have too little, it's not exactly the norm to wear sunscreen every time you step outside.
erelong•15h ago
tl;dr you probably should get a few minutes of sunlight daily on your unexposed skin without sunscreen for the "health gains"

(you can also wear clothes to block sun instead of sunscreen so you don't necessarily need sunscreen at all)

dntrkv•15h ago
So everything in moderation? Cool, glad my philosophy still applies.
TacticalCoder•1h ago
Extreme tension leads to breakage. Something something in buddhism about not trying to put too much tension in a bow or it'll break.

Also known as the middle way.

Moderation is a great philosophy.

echelon_musk•41m ago
> something in buddhism about not trying to put too much tension in a bow or it'll break

Perhaps you are referencing AN 6.55 Sona Sutta.

https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an06/an06.055.th...

halffullbrain•14m ago
Moderation is good, just don't overdo it...
jrflowers•14h ago
No. It is terrible on noodles. Every brand.
Jblx2•52m ago
Yeah, but it is better than margarine?
danparsonson•9m ago
I can't believe it's not better.
Zenbit_UX•13h ago
The article seems to be a meta analysis of a bunch of conflicting research to support a narrative that we don’t really know shit.

And fair, we don’t.

But a couple of things we do know that weren’t covered - egregiously so - is that aging is UV damage. Sometimes called photoaging, wrinkles, sun spots, discoloration, fine lines, grey hair, all of that shit that you associate with someone visibly looking old is sun damage.

So the picture that the article paints of some pasty nerds in offices shielding themselves from all UV and thus: they might as well be smoking… it doesn’t even touch on why people might be doing this.

Both kurgezadt and veritasium did some really great videos on photoaging and it’s worth checking out if this is new information to you.

JR1427•13h ago
I've not heard that grey hair is sun damage.

Do you have any sources for that?

Zenbit_UX•11h ago
There’s plenty, though please evaluate the veracity of their claims for yourself, I’m not a scientist nor do I excel at parsing scientific articles. Here’s one I’ve come across after a few minutes which references many others https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S10111...
JR1427•9h ago
After a quick skim, that article seems to be talking about something other than typical age-related greying. More photobleaching.
Zenbit_UX•
jml7c5•12h ago
(2019)
Cockbrand•11h ago
A bit unclear - it says

> Weller’s largest study yet is due to be published later in 2019

But in the header, it also says

> Updated May 31, 2024

I'd still love to know whether there has been further research in the meantime.

dang•1h ago
And https://web.archive.org/web/20260000000000*/https://www.outs... seems to suggest 2021. I guess we'll put that above, although we had 2019 in the 2022 thread (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48715020) :)
jml7c5•53m ago
It was published early 2019, maybe late 2018.

Searching for the title of the article ("Is sunscreen the new margarine?") makes it easy to pinpoint: there is a open letter responding to the article, dated January 15, 2019. https://www.asds.net/Portals/0/PDF/LetterToTheEditor-Outside...

dang•32m ago
Ok, let's go with 2019!
sevenseacat•12h ago
Coming from the skin cancer capital of the world (Australia) - no, no it is not
jhbadger•57m ago
Yeah, lack of Vitamin D may or may not be a problem (well, obviously in extreme cases it leads to rickets, but that's rare). But skin cancer unquestionably is a problem, and not infrequently a deadly one. Pick your battles.
kulahan•34m ago
Australia is kind of an exception. You’ve got a super outdoor culture, a bunch of fair-skinned people, thin ozone, and very clear skies.
_visgean•12h ago
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135382922... this is better source on the underlying study
dang•1h ago
Related:

Current guidelines for sun exposure are unhealthy and unscientific – research (2019) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31471416 - May 2022 (335 comments)

Cider9986•1h ago
Do we really have to reapply every 2 hours?
layman51•3m ago
I have heard that some Asian or European sunscreens have some UV blockers that are much more stable than the ones that are mainly used in sunscreens available in the USA. So if you’re using one of these, the need to reapply isn’t as much of a concern. The only thing is that they aren’t FDA approved.

Some examples I have heard of are “ethylhexyl triazone”, “diethylamino hydroxybenzoyl hexyl benzoate”, and “bemotrizinol”.

layman51•1h ago
Does anyone know whether UVA or UVB is more conducive to producing vitamin D naturally? A quick search shows me that it is mainly UVB that's responsible for that, but unfortunately, this is what gets blocked out by glass windows and sunscreen. On the other hand, UVA is what causes early aging.

So this is just an unfortunate situation because I don't think there's a way of just getting UVB into you in a safe way.

krupan•22m ago
The article explains that it is much safer than not getting UVB. Nothing in this universe is completely safe, but the evidence is that getting UVB is bar far safer than not getting it
jondcallahan•1h ago
I made a small little web app calculator for myself and my family to figure out how long we could stay outside without needing sunscreen based on current UV and skin type. I use it daily in the summer and a couple thousand people use it every month also. You can check it out at https://sunburntimer.com. It's also free and open source software, github link in footer.
Arubis•1h ago
Denver, CO, USA resident here -- this looks _super_ useful and I'm likely to start using it heavily. Our weather here is usually very outside-encouraging (if getting hotter over the years) and our UV is _ridiculous_; I see the index hit 11 and 12 with some regularity. Thanks for the link!
hankbond•37m ago
This is awesome thank you for making this!
fullykubed•18m ago
Looks like the weather might be a bit off, I imagine from your upstream provider. In Indianapolis, all stats look correct except it says we have thunderstorms. Couldn't be a clearer day and nothing on the radar.
ericmcer•48m ago
I think this all stems from Baby boomers controlling the narrative. Baby boomers had an insane relationship with the sun. Getting crispy brown tan, using tanning oils, using that metal collar to blast sun directly into their face, and frequenting tanning beds were viewed as totally normal and healthy things.

Big surprise they all got skin cancer. Then they swung the pendulum all the way back and now preach 24/7 sunscreen and never letting the sun touch you.

robertjpayne•45m ago
The article doesn't make really controlled findings. There's an argument to be made that the increase to diseases isn't purely lack of vitamin D but lack of exercise.

Our ancestors got lots of Vit D but they also got lots of exercise while absorbing the sun.

I still don't think it's going to be wise to go out and just bake in the high UV of early afternoons but rather it's important to go outside early to mid morning or late afternoon and absorb some sun without copious amounts of sunblock.

krupan•25m ago
Wow, it feels like nobody read the article. Findings:

- high blood pressure leads to a lot of deaths

- people that spend more time in the sun have lower blood pressure

- skin cancer is caused by sun exposure, but it kills far, far less people than high blood pressure

- people that spend more time in the sun have a lower rate of dying from skin cancer than people who spend less time in the sun!

Summary: more sun exposure makes you less likely to die on at least two fronts!

It's really very simple. You skin adapts to sunlight and doesn't burn if you increase your exposure gradually, and then you get some amazing benefits from it!

IcyWindows•19m ago
What I got from this is if we mandate the hospitals open their rooms to the sun, the new correlation will cause people to avoid the sunlight because "it leads to more deaths"
9h ago
From the conclusions:

> Sun radiation affects hair properties as color, luster, mechanical resistance, the content of proteins and others.

TLDR Yes it impacts color. Further reading can be found in the 75 studies that can be found in the references section.

JR1427•9h ago
When most people think of age-related hair greying (which you referenced in your original post), they think of the phenomenon whereby hair follicles stop producing pigments that colour hair.

This is distinct from UV bleaching of the pigments in the hair.

JR1427•9h ago
If hair greying was mostly caused by UV damage, I would expect that the pattern of greying would be even, and begin on the top of the head.

In contrast (based on my own unscientific observations!) greying typically begins in small areas, and often on the temples - not what I'd expect if caused by UV damage.

gib444•55m ago
Now I'm curious why it starts on the temples (it's where mine started too, then my fringe)
ButlerianJihad•6m ago
If you compare President Obama photos (2008) to President Obama photos (2016) you may conclude that he spent most of his time lounging on the beach?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20081217_PRESSER-504...

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:President_Obama_and_...

asdff•1h ago
Pro golfers look a good 10-20 years older than their real age sometimes fwiw. In contrast to most other pro athletes in indoor disciplines who generally look better than their age. There's also examples of truckers who spent most of their career with the window rolled down and you can tell straight up what side of the road they drove on.
thih9•1h ago
Truckers, plural? Is there an example that isn’t William McElligott from the famous photo[1]?

Edit: self answer, yes[2] (left side!)

[1]: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trucker-accumulates-skin-damage...

[2]: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/health/lorry-driver-ages-drama...

layman51•1h ago
Those drivers don't even need to have the window rolled down as far as I know. That's because most door auto glass lets UVA rays through and that's what causes premature aging. If you want to block those UVA rays, you would need to apply some kind of additional film to the side window.
Rendello•40m ago
I first took sun exposure seriously after backpacking and spending time with other young travellers in hostels. It was apparent who spent their time exposed to the sun, I remember a girl my age who was in the middle of a multi-year cycle tour, and although I envied her journey, her skin looked quite rough. I decided that if I ended up doing that, I'd get one of those cycle helmet brim visors and would probably just cover my face during a lot of the riding portions.

Then I met a man who did kayak tours of a city. He was awesome, but really leathery due to the 20 years in a boat without shade and having the UV reflections off the water. Your skin cancer risk is off the charts at that point.

tasty_freeze•28m ago
I often embarrass my daughter when she has some new friend over. If the topic comes up, I give a demonstration. I'm 62 and I've never tried to get a tan and work indoors, and I haven't had a serious sunburn in close to 40 years. On the other hand, I lived spent the last 20 years in Austin, TX. I mow the yard and I ride a bike and in the summer months I put on sunblock before doing the bike rides an sometimes mowing.

The exposed parts of my arms look like I'm 62 -- freckles, some age spots, the skin has lost a lot of elasticity. But then I roll up my T-shirt sleeve to expose my shoulder and my skin is like it was when I was 25: not just pale, but no freckles, no age spots, still supple.

krupan•24m ago
Who cares about your skin looking a little older when it prevents cardiovascular related deaths??