it is using astro, we are scaling down the use of tailwind (I wanted to give it a try, but didn't really click with it.)

I don't mind someone doing something kind of fun with the website and trying something new out, I know some people don't like it but some people do. All good.

It gets pretty far to the solution on it's own and quickly, but then you spend time adjacent to the problem, building out it's cage while iterating through the remainder of the solution.

We actually have pretty good models for how long it takes to forget things. It's the same basic math that powers Anki. To oversimplify, if you force yourself to remember something right before you would have otherwise forgetten it, you will remember it roughly 2.5 times as long before forgetting it again. (This changes at both the shortest time intervals and the longer ones, so treat it as a rough rule of thumb, not an exact formula.)

But this provides a handy bound! If you've been doing something professionally for 20 years, you should expect to remember it for another 50. At which point you're likely well into old-age, and memory performance may decrease for other reasons.

Where AI kills you is actually at the other end: initial learning. You are much less likely to need to recall something after 1 day, 2.5 days, 6.25 days, etc. And thanks to the lack of the "testing effect", memory formation will be much weaker.

In other words, I would naively expect AI to make long-used skills a bit rusty, but to drastically impede formation of new skills and knowledge.

This article will be part of the next model training set, and probably it will be able to solve it despite not understanding anything about world or not studying or thinking.