frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix

https://ui.shadcn.com/docs/changelog
139•dabinat•6h ago•47 comments

If you're a button, you have one job

https://unsung.aresluna.org/if-youre-a-button-you-have-one-job/
237•nozzlegear•8h ago•123 comments

Command and Conquer Generals natively ported to macOS, iPhone, iPad using Fable

https://github.com/ammaarreshi/Generals-Mac-iOS-iPad/tree/main
578•asronline•15h ago•243 comments

Web-based cryptography is always snake oil

https://www.devever.net/~hl/webcrypto
29•enz•2h ago•34 comments

Pandoc Lua Filters

https://pandoc.org/lua-filters.html
73•ankitg12•2d ago•2 comments

GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance

https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/30364
281•maille•12h ago•111 comments

Apocketlypse

https://0dd.company/galleries/triumph/1.html
16•scaglio•2h ago•1 comments

Programmers need to start meditating

https://jacob.gold/posts/programmers-need-to-start-meditating-now/
59•enz•3h ago•47 comments

Jellyfish can heal wounds in minutes. Scientists want their secrets

https://www.mbl.edu/news/jellyfish-can-heal-wounds-minutes-scientists-want-their-secrets
129•hhs•12h ago•30 comments

Fast Software, the Best Software

https://craigmod.com/essays/fast_software/
16•ustad•3h ago•5 comments

Megawatts by Microwave

https://computer.rip/2026-07-04-microwave-and-power.html
27•eternauta3k•4h ago•2 comments

Google Books (or similar) all book scans – $200k bounty (2025)

https://software.annas-archive.gl/AnnaArchivist/annas-archive/-/work_items/234
475•Cider9986•17h ago•272 comments

Leaking YouTube creators' private videos

https://javoriuski.com/post/youtube
624•javxfps•18h ago•346 comments

Moby Dick Workout (2022)

https://www.hogbaysoftware.com/posts/moby-dick-workout/
45•helloplanets•6h ago•13 comments

Artful Cats: Feline-Inspired Art and Artifacts

https://www.si.edu/spotlight/art-cats
44•jruohonen•3d ago•4 comments

About the Digital Art

https://www.tricivenola.com/about-the-digital-art/
10•NaOH•3d ago•1 comments

The Economy Is K-Shaped

https://moai.studio/blog/posts/economy-is-k-shaped.html
6•ionwake•2d ago•4 comments

Better Models: Worse Tools

https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/7/4/better-models-worse-tools/
178•leemoore•14h ago•63 comments

Atomic Force Microscope high-speed video, stainless etching, bacteria, and more

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyIQkqBXhS0
77•mhb•2d ago•8 comments

Meta's Un-Stable Signature

https://hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/1098-Metas-Un-Stable-Signature.html
92•ementally•3d ago•13 comments

The Log Is the Agent

https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21997
46•iacguy•7h ago•12 comments

Zig: All Package Management Functionality Moved from Compiler to Build System

https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/#2026-06-30
210•tosh•18h ago•67 comments

Potential session/cache leakage between workspace instances or consumer accounts

https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/74066
300•chatmasta•20h ago•129 comments

Return of the Nigerian Prince Redux: Beware Book Club and Book Review Scams (2025)

https://writerbeware.blog/2025/09/19/return-of-the-nigerian-prince-redux-beware-book-club-and-boo...
53•Anon84•10h ago•13 comments

"Beyond the limit": Satellites and mirrors in space pose threat to the night sky

https://www.eso.org/public/news/eso2607/
147•Breadmaker•17h ago•249 comments

My ASN Journey series (2024)

https://www.animmouse.com/p/my-asn-journey/
22•antonalekseev•6h ago•8 comments

What ORMs have taught me: just learn SQL (2014)

https://wozniak.ca/blog/2014/08/03/1/index.html
195•ciconia•4d ago•226 comments

Record-breaking solo rower Kelsey Pfendler arrives in Hawaii

https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2026/07/04/record-breaking-solo-rower-kelsey-pfendler-arrives-hawaii/
53•MaysonL•9h ago•6 comments

sqlite-utils 4.0rc2, mostly written by Claude Fable (for about $149.25)

https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jul/5/sqlite-utils-fable/
51•ognyankulev•4h ago•56 comments

Drone Autonomy (2021)

https://www.cggonzalez.com/blog/index.html
60•cgg1•11h ago•5 comments
Open in hackernews

Programmers need to start meditating

https://jacob.gold/posts/programmers-need-to-start-meditating-now/
58•enz•3h ago

Comments

ehnto•1h ago
I have certainly noticed my stress skyrocket in this new mode of working. I was used to getting a lot done very quickly, with intense pockets of work followed downtime. Now it feels more like a steady stream of medium stress, and there is no opportunity to stop or drop the thread.

I must admit, if this is the new way of doing software development (eg: not actually programming but working with LLMs) I am not going to stick around for that long. It's not what I fell on love with, it's not what I trained for etc. I may as well do a job I don't enjoy that lets me rest my brain for later.

senfiaj•1h ago
Yeah, same thoughts. And this industry is becoming so volatile, I'm not sure what will happen tomorrow. I mean it's highly unlikely that AI will replace developers at least in the next 10 years, but I'm not sure what will "software developer" become. Certain people love to work with details. If AI is taking away this joy, I'll rather retire as early as possible from this volatile industry.
bragh•54m ago
Maybe we just aren't far enough in the vibe coding side of things and there are still too many people in the industry who still pay attention to details, so no major catastrophes haven't happened yet because of vibe coding. So the people who pay attention to details are still carrying their organizations, but I do wonder how long it is going to be sustainable.

When it comes to joy killers because of AI, then it is dismal how plagiarism (going by the definition of "presenting someone else's work without attribution") suddenly became widely accepted. When I see long lists of bullet points with interspersed bold text, I know that it is something the sender did not write or bother reviewing. Absolute cherry on top when in the end of that text you see the typical LLM suggestion that you can ask for more information, which the sender didn't even bother removing.

inigyou•28m ago
> major catastrophes haven't happened yet because of vibe coding

Didn't Azure, AWS and Cloudflare crash a few times in the second half of 2025 because of vibe coding?

ThunderSizzle•15m ago
Catastrophies would be we vibe coded a nuclear plant or space rocket system and we blew up thousands of people due to a vibe coding error.
inigyou•11m ago
Bringing most of the western world economy to a standstill isn't one? When I say AWS was down I mean AWS was down.
bragh•2m ago
They crashed yes, but not for too long and they did recover. And was it ever confirmed it was because of vibe coding? Not sure how much if any it even impacted their stock.
stalfie•33m ago
10 years is a long time. 10 years ago the Transformer architecture didn't exist. I would call it moderately unlikely at best. At the very least, I would say it's likely that development will require an entirely different skillet 10 years from now.
embedding-shape•6m ago
Not sound harsh but that the people who solved problems with code just because they love coding disappears from problem-solving environments does sounds like a win-win for everyone involved. I've both been in situations where I loved coding the solution more than I want the problem solved, and I got in the way of people who just wanted the solution, and vice-versa where architect-astronauts are more interested in coding that solving things so they get in the way. If these could be better separated, that feels like the right direction.
homarp•1h ago
well, gurus are supposed to meditate, once in a while.

per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guru_Meditation

6stringmerc•1h ago
“I’m doing five things at once very effectively”

…sure you are buddy, sure you are…

Note to self: book appointment with Optometrist ASAP to correct how far my eyes have rolled back into my head.

globalnode•47m ago
hehe
delis-thumbs-7e•1h ago
I noticed how relaxing and meditative programming can be. It might sound that after day job basically solving other people pronlems I sit down late at noght to just write code for hours on end. But I really enjoy it. Using LLM’s to generate the code ruins it.

I have also done meditation, but I struggle to keep it up for long. I think you should really do it consistently to get majority of effects. Coding, exercising, drawing has always been an easier form of meditation for me.

galaxyLogic•1h ago
My favorite metaphor for programming is playing chess. Your opponent in programming is the complexity, you don't see its moves before the coding and design progress, before you make your choices/moves. You solve a problem by writing some code but that causes new problems down the line you didn't know existed before you made your choice of writing some specific code. or choosing a specific design.

Chess-players too are in a very "meditative" state when they play, and they enjoy it, I assume because it let's them focus on the game and forget about everything else.

pjmlp•1h ago
On the contrary, many still need to learn how to say no.
jahala•1h ago
Meditation - «getting used to»

A most elementary form of meditation, is getting used to placing your attention on a sensation and keeping it anchored there - even when other sensations or thoughts arise.

Following the breath- place your awareness, your attention, on the sensation of air passing through your nostrils. Count one inbreath and outbreath cycle as «1», and count until 10 or 21. Decide before you start, how many repetitions of 10 or 21 you will do.

If at any point your attention has drifted to a different sensation - seeing, hearing etc, or thinking, visual imagery etc, then congratulate yourself for noticing, and restart from «1».

I recommend «The attention revolution» by Alan B. Wallace

david-gpu•1h ago
Thank you. I like the comparison of "meditation" with "sport": it is not all the same, even if there are commonalities between some disciplines.

It is rare to see laypeople discuss some of the different types and which one may be best suited for a particular goal.

If the goal is simply relieving stress, performing some sport outdoors —especially team sports— is probably more effective than any meditation, for most people.

globalnode•49m ago
thanks
inigyou•26m ago
Why 21?
mstaoru•21m ago
So you can place your attention on a single session of Claude Code, count to 21, and switch to another? :)
senfiaj•1h ago
>> I’m clearly much more productive now. I’m doing five things at once very effectively, switching between multiple agent sessions from morning to night.

Joel Spolsky disagrees here: https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2001/02/12/human-task-switche...

gb2d_hn•39m ago
I feel like it depends on the task, and that's why people seem to disagree on this. Think about a manager managing 5 devs. If he is working on planning and managing work for his dev team, we don't say he is task switching, he's just taking a management role where he takes a high level view of the task at hand and then delegates the deep dive. Where it differs for devs is that we could in theory run multiple agents concurrently, but frequently, currently, we have to dive in and give the agents significant steers and this pulls us in to the detail. The same will happen for managers. The variables are the complexity of the task, the capability of the agent and the number of tasks. There are lots of scenarios where devs can run multiple tasks without too much mental overload, but I think what is hard is that we don't know when an agent will underperform on a task and we will get pulled back into developer mode. Maybe it's a case of running for as long as you can in manager mode and then accept that when one agent needs help, you have to single task with that agent (I think this is what makes us feel like we are the bottleneck, and that's where the feeling of stress creeps in). I thought about this a lot while working on https://www.agentkanban.io which I use to help me partition agent chats by task, run separate worktrees etc
sscaryterry•6m ago
I rate Joel immensely, however, that post is 25 years old.
sph•49m ago
You say programming used to be a meditative activity.

Then why get overwhelmed by LLMs and meditate to calm down, when you can just write the code yourself at a healthier pace? Tools are supposed to be designed around humans, it’s not the human that has to adapt to the machine.

In any case, meditating with an end to destress or to reach higher levels of productivity is missing the point of meditation.

varjag•42m ago
It's fine for your pet projects. But for most of professional programming it's no longer feasible as you'll be at a small fraction of your machine assisted performance.
sph•35m ago
My performance in writing code was never once the problem. I don’t get why I should increase the amount of output by depending on a third party tool to do my thinking to whom I have to explain my very abstract thought process in words.

The point of being an experienced programmer is thinking in data structures and transformations, not in prose. Why would I introduce all that friction?

witx•24m ago
If you think performance relates to speed and amount of code per unit of time yes. If you're more grounded with the reality of software engineering then no
cl3misch•17m ago
> Tools are supposed to be designed around humans

This is a common thing to say, but when during the development of human civilization has this actually been the case? Is agriculture designed around humans more than hunting/gathering? Is industrialized work more designed around humans than agrarian society?

I don't mean to sound pessimistic or technocratic; quite the contrary. But I think we shouldn't project our desire for equanimity onto romantized versions of civilization.

ajb•49m ago
This isn't the worst article, and it's triggered a decent amount of discussion (despite being very short). However, I really dislike "What you're doing wrong/failing to do" titles. They are intended to trigger anxiety, which is manipulative and (in this case) precisely contradicts the concern the author is purporting to have for the rest of us.

On the subject: some people find meditation very helpful, others find it a net negative, or useless, or impossible to do. So a categorical "you should do this" isn't correct or particularly helpful. Try it, if it works for you, great; but don't put it about that people who aren't doing it are being negligent in some way.

wolvoleo•3m ago
> On the subject: some people find meditation very helpful, others find it a net negative, or useless, or impossible to do. So a categorical "you should do this" isn't correct or particularly helpful. Try it, if it works for you, great; but don't put it about that people who aren't doing it are being negligent in some way

Absolutely. I've tried mediation in many situations and some classes but it's just not for me. My ADHD brain doesn't work that way. It's painfully boring and not relaxing at all. What does work for me is a walk through nature after a stressful day. There's another thing that works even better but too fringey and a bit nsfw to go into detail :)

You need to find what works for you.

phyzix5761•45m ago
For anyone interested in Vipasanna mediation in the tradition of Mahasi Sayadaw: https://sirimangalo.org/text/how-to-meditate/
hannofcart•20m ago
As someone brought up in a Hindu household (with Brahmin orthodoxy at that and all the casteism that came with it) and having learnt to shun all of that culture, and the religious indoctrination, here's the essence of mindfulness meditation that I was taught that I still practice and find useful.

1. Sit somewhere comfortable. Sitting "cross legged" or with your "back straight" as the guide linked to above advocates is not necessary. A comfortable chair/couch is fine.

2. The room should preferably be quiet. Though if you have the privilege of access to an outdoor courtyard that's quiet other than birdsong and chirp of insects, you'll probably enjoy it more. But a quiet room is good enough.

3. Phase 1: Set a timer on your watch/phone for 5 mins. Close your eyes. And let your mind wander. Doesn't matter what your mind drifts towards.

4. Phase 2: Restart the 5 min timer. Now, try quieten your mind of thoughts and focus instead on just your breathing. Be gentle with yourself. Your mind will wander again and that's fine. Just gently nudge it back to your breathing.

That's pretty much it. Slowly, over months try and increase Phase 2 from 5 to 10 mins.

When I described this to my partner, I used the analogy of treating your mind like a curious eager pup. In the first phase, cutting of external stimulus of sight by closing your eyes is like having the pup with you in a closed room.

In phase 2, you gently hold the puppy near you and get it to quiet down and stay still.

She mentioned that this analogy helped her a lot.

Honestly, this is pretty much the gist of it. I suspect that you will likely get most of the benefits of advanced meditative techniques with just the 2 simple steps from above. YMMV.

Be patient though. Getting to a fully calm state of mind takes months of practice.

phyzix5761•3m ago
The Mahasi method is quite different. You don't try to calm or control your mind. You observe and note your experiences as they're happening. Over time the calmness comes (and goes) but its not the goal. The goal is to see reality clearly. This clear seeing (which is where the word Vipassana comes from) leads to a change in the habit patterns that cause our stress and suffering.
iamflimflam1•32m ago
I don’t think this article is suggesting really going for it in terms of meditation. But, as a warning to people, there is evidence that meditation can be dangerous for some people.
witx•21m ago
> I’m clearly much more productive now. I’m doing five things at once very effectively, switching between multiple agent sessions from morning to night. After working full-time like this for ~8 months, one thing I’m sure of is that this way of working involves much less time spent in a flow state.

What an utter piece of BS. AI goons really like to smell their own crap

jdw64•18m ago
Personally, I feel that as an individual, it's the right time to complete a program, but as a team, it's become harder.

It's true that the proportion of founders has increased both in the US and in my country, Korea.

And unlike the old days, it feels like what's needed now isn't so much deep, concentrated programming knowledge in one area, but rather broad knowledge across many fields. The claim that "productivity has increased" really only applies to freelancers. In fact, there's been a noticeable increase in freelance outsourcing requests that would be hard to handle without AI, lots of short deadline gigs compared to before. And of course, that makes it harder to charge appropriately.

For teams, on the other hand, you still need things like code reviews and team decision making.

As an individual, I've practically become someone who just writes up a gate, lets AI handle the code, checks that the core domain doesn't break, watches the gate's rules, and pulls the lever.

The reason team work slows down is mainly because Agile methodologies and code review processes are still human centric and consensus driven, and human cognitive speed itself becomes the bottleneck.

So I can understand a lot of the arguments that come up in the comments. The important thing is that most people tend to only see their own situation and their own context, which makes it hard for them to understand others.

stavros•18m ago
I was discussing Buddhism with a few Buddhist friends this past weekend, and I randomly had an enlightenment. It was a very odd experience, I felt like I understood all the weird things I'd heard from them, and I suddenly became very calm and accepting of everything. I also had a sense of sort of "watching" what I was experiencing through my own eyes.

I'm generally hyper rationalist, so this was a very interesting experience, and it happened because a random thing one of my friends said about meditation made something "click" in me.

It lasted about a day, I can't say I have any lasting effects from it now. It'd be interesting to see if I can make it happen again, but when I was in that state, I thought that trying to make it happen would defeat the purpose.

cyclopeanutopia•6m ago
What was the thing that made you click?
keyle•16m ago
I've been doing this for 25 years professionally and let's just say I'm more the 3 coffees, 1 redbull, headphones and bassdrive kind of programmer.

So no, I will not be "meditating". My meditative states tend to be beard stroking and occasional F bomb.

testfrequency•12m ago
I was so stressed at work a few years ago. Burnt out. Exhausted. I started meditating. Shared with my manager that I started, and it’s been helping me process all the chaos at work.

He told me that wasn’t normal, and I shouldn’t have to meditate just to function at work :’)

titanomachy•8m ago
I don’t context switch when doing agentic programming. Instead, I use a single agent thread (in pi) and pay extra for faster inference (GLM 5.2 from fireworks.ai, currently; around 100 tokens per second). I rarely spend more than $25 per working week, which is a fraction of a percent of my own fee (I’m a specialist consultant). I also keep an Anthropic subscription and use that for longer research and design tasks.

I’m sure there are many people who produce more than me, but I retain my sanity as well as a high level of understanding of the code that I produce, which in my domain I feel is still important. I’ve tried ultracode-style subagent workflows and find that they rapidly produce reams of slop that I don’t have the patience or energy to properly review.

I also meditate quite a bit.

Uptrenda•7m ago
Bros "discuss on hacker news" link takes you to submit the article here. that really rustles my jimmies. its unfortunate that bro couldnt csrf the submit link thanks to submit tokens. I have no doubt he would have tried that too.
cyclopeanutopia•3m ago
There is also a simpler approach: just stop using AI.

And if you can't, THAT should be a big red warning sign for you.

tiborsaas•2m ago
So attention is all we need?
Syntaf
•
6m ago
Does Joel still disagree today?

Worth noting that this article is 25 years old. The world was very very different back then, especially when it comes to software engineering.

Context switching is a problem when the cost of switching contexts is non-negligible -- but in the age of agentic development is that still really true? Surely yes for some problems, but for many others I would argue it no longer is.

A personal anecdote for you:

At my company we have a local development CLI our devX team built, it allows for agents to interact with standing up, tearing down and managing local stacks for our software suite. When I receive customer feedback about a broken button, or a poor UX experience, I simply start up a prompt:

/metal user X reported an issue on the trial balance page, they encountered a blank page when using the inception to date filter. We need to investigate the root cause, spin up a new stack, and resolve the bug.

Then off to the next task, maybe some few hours later I'll check back in on the session and I'll see:

> PR created: https://github.com/company/repo/pull/12758295 > QA URL: http://localhost:8400/<url> > Summary of root cause and fix: lorem ipsum lorem ipsum

After a quick QA session I validate the fix, confirm that our claude reviewer has approved the PR and merge the PR to deploy. The mental burden of switching to this task is quite low, orders of magnitude lower than it would be 25 years ago.

kator•3m ago
That was 2001 today Joel seems to think this is the future: https://hash.ai/