frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

The session you cannot take with you

https://earendil.com/posts/session-portability/
347•apitman•6h ago•78 comments

JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) merged to OpenJDK master

https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31120
113•mfiguiere•5h ago•49 comments

DeepSeek-V4-Flash Update

https://api-docs.deepseek.com/updates/
284•dnhkng•4h ago•119 comments

Google fixed more Chrome bugs in June than over the past two years, thanks to AI

https://blog.google/security/chrome-stronger-with-every-update/
68•Garbage•2h ago•76 comments

Stacked PRs are now live on GitHub

https://github.blog/changelog/2026-07-30-stacked-pull-requests-are-now-in-public-preview/
648•tomzorz•17h ago•228 comments

Show HN: Gander, an Android file viewer that asks for no permissions at all

https://github.com/mokshablr/gander
58•mokshablr•4h ago•20 comments

Show HN: What should the GUI for AI agents look like?

https://marbleos.com/demo
55•akbabu•4h ago•34 comments

Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots

https://deepmind.google/blog/gemini-robotics-2-brings-whole-body-intelligence-to-robots/
561•ai2027•18h ago•446 comments

I flagged two research papers for fake authors and both were accepted as orals

https://geospatialml.com/posts/reviewing-ai-slop/
196•volumes94•11h ago•92 comments

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/deepseek-v4-flash-ga
14•theanonymousone•2h ago•4 comments

The mean means nothing: data visualization to debug a latency problem

https://fzakaria.com/2026/07/27/the-mean-means-nothing
41•fanf2•1d ago•6 comments

Where USB Memory Sticks are Born (2013)

https://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/2013/where-usb-memory-sticks-are-born/
54•jacquesm•3d ago•3 comments

Read this before you buy that TV streaming stick

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/07/read-this-before-you-buy-that-tv-streaming-stick/
719•speckx•17h ago•433 comments

Show HN: A udev implementation in Guile Scheme

https://codeberg.org/goodev/goodev
7•mbakke•3d ago•3 comments

The Religion of Speed

https://graybeard.ing/the-religion-of-speed/
163•MobiusHorizons•10h ago•78 comments

Obfuscation (Part II): Diamond IO

https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2026/07/28/obfuscation_part_ii_diamond_io.html
3•elffjs•2d ago•0 comments

Simulating TCP loss and congestion in browser using Go/WASM

https://ccsim.fly.dev
22•dilyevsky•2d ago•0 comments

Danube's record low levels force shutdown of Hungary's only nuclear plant

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn0nqv05g0do
39•vrganj•2h ago•43 comments

The Economic Benefit of Refactoring

https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/refactoring-economic-benefit.html
241•javaeeeee•18h ago•101 comments

Physicists Solve a Muon Mystery. Now, Old Results Don't Add Up

https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-solve-a-muon-mystery-now-old-results-dont-add-up-20260729/
218•ibobev•18h ago•140 comments

CodePen 2.0

https://chriscoyier.net/2026/07/30/codepen-2-0/
169•robin_reala•16h ago•49 comments

GCC steering committee announces AI policy

https://lwn.net/Articles/1086041/
297•arto•22h ago•325 comments

The AI Aesthetic

https://blog.jim-nielsen.com/2026/ai-aesthetic/
306•montroser•10h ago•133 comments

Bad Apple but It's Traceroute

https://jssfr.de/2026-07-27-bad-apple-but-traceroute.html
119•jssfr•3d ago•34 comments

Memo-1: A 6502 computer built from scratch, using a Minitel as its terminal

https://github.com/MemoireMorte/Memo-1
77•sciences44•2d ago•10 comments

UEFA and its national associations will not participate in FIFA competitions

https://www.uefa.com/news-media/news/02a7-213a92896eb0-54dfbf454e3b-1000--statement-on-behalf-of-...
1036•dickfickling•15h ago•564 comments

Rune 1.1: adds Python, an Emacs editor, a symbol index and is now free

https://rune.build/blog/rune-1-1-release
81•ernestrc•12h ago•31 comments

The lost civic life of movie rental stores

https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/the-lost-civic-life-of-movie-rental-stores/
169•facundo_olano•19h ago•222 comments

Saber-toothed cats became inbred–and struggled to move–before they went extinct

https://www.science.org/content/article/saber-toothed-cats-became-inbred-and-struggled-move-they-...
57•gmays•12h ago•24 comments

Show HN: Distilling DeepSeek into GPT-OSS doesn't transfer censorship. Try it

https://www.ctgt.ai/research/distillation-censorship-transfer
125•cgorlla•15h ago•64 comments
Open in hackernews

Danube's record low levels force shutdown of Hungary's only nuclear plant

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn0nqv05g0do
39•vrganj•2h ago

Comments

vrganj•2h ago
This is happening all across Europe right now - Romania, France too.

https://www.euronews.com/business/2026/07/13/france-shuts-do...

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/hungarys-paks-nuclea...

We keep having folks here argue that nuclear, not renewables are the path to take to get rid of fossil fuels. I have strong doubts - it feels like that doesn't account for the sad realities of climate change.

cinntaile•2h ago
People arguing for one alternative over the other are usually politically motivated. I feel like you are doing the same. Sometimes nuclear is a good fit, sometimes renewables is a good fit, sometimes fossil fuels are a good fit. Most of the time a mix is the best fit. It depends on what you are optimizing for and what is geographically, (geo)politically and economically possible. All these systems are then built using assumptions, sometimes those assumptions no longer make sense after a certain period of time and sometimes you just temporarily or permanently have to adapt to the changes in the environment. This is an unusual but expected scenario for the nuclear plants along the Danube.
vrganj•1h ago
I'm not really opposed to nuclear power politically. I just think it's a non-starter given the much higher cost, complexity of buildout and lack of reliability.
deepsummer•37m ago
In countries with dark winters and without enough hydro power, the only reliable alternative are fossil fuels...
oblio•35m ago
Wind + storage, geothermal.
deepsummer•22m ago
Storage of energy in the dimensions required for weeks with almost no wind is an unsolved problem. Right now, we can't store enough to make it through a single night without using fossil fuels. Most countries don't even have the capacity to store the energy for a single hour.
emsign•12m ago
Geothermal and storage is worth investing in, investing in nuclear is not. NPPs are simply too expensive and you won't find investors unless you heavily subsidize it with tax money. Only compnies willing to invest in NPPs are those with virtually free money: the handful of AI big tech giants.
RandomLensman•7m ago
As we can store fossil fuels for weeks of demand, we can store the required energy in chemical form, no? Germany has huge natural gas storage, for ezample.
flr03•34m ago
Different reasons though, France has nothing to do with water level or availability. It's for environment protection.
emsign•19m ago
Not true at all. It's both in France and increasingly because the rivers run dry in the summer. Besides killing rivers for electricity and for "saving CO2" is as stupid as burning coal to keep HVACs running becauae the summers are getting hotter and hotter each year.
stefan_•34m ago
This is a technical problem with technical solutions. You can just fix things, you don't need to throw out 30% of your power generation to pay billions for climate change vagueposting.
Cthulhu_•19m ago
Kind of? I'm sure you can change a nuclear power plant so it doesn't rely on river or sea water but that's not something that can be done overnight.

Restoring river water levels can't be done through technical solutions though, they rely on the weather and we can't control that. The European river levels are largely influenced by inland rain, snowfall, and glacier forming/melting; snowfall and rain has been meagre this year, glaciers have been melting and receding for decades now.

emsign•16m ago
Electricity costs by nuclear power is heavily subsidized by tax money in France, so the French are paying the higher costs anyway. Just saying. Maybe there's a technical solution involving nuclear but it's really expensive compared to the much cheaper technical solution: renewable energy.
eecc•23m ago
It’s the second of third year in a row that this happens.

At some point it will be the new normal.

Cthulhu_•21m ago
It can be, but you need water, just like for solar you need sunlight and storage and for wind power you need, well, wind. Coal and gas rely on natural resources, which can be disrupted through geopolitical tension, like Russia's gas supplies into Europe getting cut off / sanctioned.

Every power source has their tradeoffs, and I don't think anyone is denying that.

What I do think is that people are making up arguments or statements that Other People have and call them out on it.

inigyou•55m ago
How can this be? They told me nuclear power was reliable base load.
comrade1234•48m ago
Here in Switzerland during some heatwaves they have to shut down nuclear plants too because the river water is too warm and adding warm water to it would kill the fish.
number6•16m ago
And it's not cold enough to cool the reactor
masklinn•7m ago
The reactor absolutely is not going to care, it’s the tertiary cooling circuit cooling for the steam turbines, it will have cooked off everything downstream long before it’s an issue.

This is entirely an ecological and safety concern.

seszett•6m ago
No that's never the problem, even 40°C intake is cool enough to cool a reactor, it's all just a question of returned water temperature that can be harmful to a river if too high (generally the limit in Europe is set to 30°C).
pepperoni_pizza•43m ago
You can totally retrofit existing nuclear power plants for closed loop cooling. I'm not sure what the cost would be, though, but it might be worth doing.
moffkalast•38m ago
Is it economically viable to run though? Natural draft towers or direct body of water cooling is used almost universally since it doesn't take any extra power. A large chunk of the powerplant's output would be running heat pump compressors to stop itself from exploding.
emsign•23m ago
First of all you can't retrofit every npp with that, it's a lie. And eve; if you could, you are correct, it's financially not viable. Renewable energy is always the cheaper option by far.
wongarsu•18m ago
Fully closed loop is probably not viable. But I suspect that's not the extreme GP might have meant.

If for the sake or discussion we simplify cooling to four options:

1: just passing river water through a heat exchanger for cooling

2: ingesting river water, using it for cooling, then passing it through a cooling tower before returning it to the river

3: pass the water output from the cooling tower directly back in the cooling loop, only ingest enough water to replace evaporation

4: fully closed loop via direct heat exchange with air

Then 4 is not very viable. But a lot of nuclear plants are stuck at 1 or 2, and each step up the ladder would allow them to operate in worse conditions. This one seems to be at version one

noduerme•6m ago
emsign•26m ago
This is what nuclear power enthusists like to ignore when they talk about nuclear power being a solution to energy and climate change.
Cthulhu_•24m ago
Is that a fact or are you just trying to spark a debate?
fylo•15m ago
Every power source has trade offs, bud. They call solar renewable, but in fact panels have a shelf life, and take valuable finite resources and energy to manufacture. This is what climate change activists like to ignore /s
bsza•4m ago
Worth mentioning we also had to shut down the largest block in our largest gas power plant on the exact same day due to an unrelated error.

https://www.dert.hu/hu/sajtoszoba/0/141 (in Hungarian, couldn't find an English source)

raverbashing•15m ago
If only there was a power source that would excel during sunny and warm days, huh

Then we could stop the nuclear plants when needed for cooling and maintenance

seszett•5m ago
> we could stop the nuclear plants when needed for cooling

Well that's exactly what they did thanks to solar power provided by the rest of the grid, so your snark seems rather unwarranted.

Luc•5m ago
Of course a 1960's design isn't adapted to current weather conditions. That doesn't mean the whole technology is useless, like so many commenters imply.

Any new build can and will include cooling adapted to hotter conditions.

comrade1234•33m ago
Iceland has no nuclear power plants.
deepsummer•29m ago
Countries like UK, Ireland, Germany, Danmark, Netherland, Poland also have dark winters. Solar in winter is only about a fifth of production in summer months.

Iceland has geothermal, which is amazing, but won't help central Europe.

defrost•24m ago
Iceland is a small area, small population outlier literally sitting on two plates rubbing up against each other and a relative excess of active volcanism and large lava fields.

  About 85 percent of the total primary energy supply in Iceland is derived from domestically produced renewable energy sources. Use of abundant hydroelectric and geothermal power has made Iceland the world's largest electricity producer per capita.
~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iceland

What works for Iceland works in few other places to the same degree (New Zealand, Yellowstone, places with thin crust and feisty caldera's).

number6•14m ago
Germany also has potential for 85% geothermal energy.

There are some interesting spots here but it's generally enough through the country to do it everywhere.

Munich gets quite a lot of it's energy from geothermal sources

stavros•52m ago
Agreed, whenever I hear someone say "we need more/less nuclear and less/more solar/wind", I hear "let's burn more fossil fuels while we uselessly split hairs".
paganel•40m ago
Everyone is politically motivated on this subject, and that's a good thing, because this is a political decision by default, where the "political" is comprised of is, the voting citizens. We can't let decisions like these be taken by unelected technocrats alone.
gib444•6m ago
[delayed]
ThePowerOfFuet•21m ago
>sometimes fossil fuels are a good fit.

Oh come on.

seszett•3m ago
> sometimes fossil fuels are a good fit

There is simply NO safe level of fossil fuel use.

How do these things, whose sole purpose is to turn heat into electricity, end up with so much extra heat that it takes more energy than they produce to disperse it? Can't the excess heat in a closed loop system be captured and used to power the cooling? Sorry, maybe this is a stupid question.
Elfener•20m ago
I've read that in the case of Paks a retrofit doesn't make sense because the entire thing is so old and needs to be rebuilt anyway.

However, hopefully, they change the plans for (stalled project) Paks 2, because that would've used the same cooling system as the first one.