frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots

https://deepmind.google/blog/gemini-robotics-2-brings-whole-body-intelligence-to-robots/
104•ai2027•50m ago•63 comments

SDL_GPU minimal, single-header, high-performance 2D graphics painting library

https://github.com/n67094/sdl_gp
28•n67094•1h ago•6 comments

Paging Through a Parquet File in DuckDB: File_row_number or Offset?

https://rusty.today/blog/paging-parquet-duckdb-file-row-number-vs-offset/
16•rustyconover•1h ago•1 comments

The Economic Benefit of Refactoring

https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/refactoring-economic-benefit.html
20•javaeeeee•56m ago•8 comments

Physicists Solve a Muon Mystery. Now, Old Results Don't Add Up

https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-solve-a-muon-mystery-now-old-results-dont-add-up-20260729/
10•ibobev•43m ago•0 comments

Launch HN: Prized (YC S26) – Let non-engineer staff build secure internal tools

https://prized.dev
35•marinoseliades•2h ago•19 comments

Hacker Public Radio

https://hackerpublicradio.org/
39•bmacho•1h ago•3 comments

RFC 8890 – The Internet is for End Users (2020)

https://mnot.net/blog/2020/for_the_users
54•notarobot123•2h ago•16 comments

Ron Gilbert started production on Thimbleweed Park 2

https://www.grumpygamer.com/twp2_announce/
163•alberto-m•7h ago•74 comments

Upper stage impacting the moon on 2026 August 5

https://www.projectpluto.com/25010d.htm
34•ryannevius•2h ago•10 comments

Gpiozero Flow

https://bennuttall.com/blog/2026/07/gpiozero-flow/
103•benn_88•5h ago•33 comments

Why Don't People Use Formal Methods? (2019)

https://www.hillelwayne.com/post/why-dont-people-use-formal-methods/
78•Thom2503•3h ago•56 comments

RCade: The Arcade Cabinet with CI/CD Deployment, Custom Graphics Card for CRT [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-OpIbLUOU0
6•evakhoury•19h ago•0 comments

Mbodi AI (YC P25) Is Hiring Robotics/Research Engineers

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/mbodi-ai/jobs
1•chitianhao•4h ago

Trusted URLs via Cryptographic Signatures

https://blog.certisfy.com/2026/04/trusted-urls-via-cryptographic.html
8•Edmond•1h ago•6 comments

Building a native C# implementation of CEL engine

https://bsid.io/writing/building-a-cel-engine-for-net
19•jackedEngineer•2d ago•2 comments

Are We Stuck with Lean?

https://mathoverflow.net/questions/513742/are-we-stuck-with-lean
51•jjgreen•4h ago•18 comments

Why Is Everyone Trying to Build a Solid-State Battery?

https://www.construction-physics.com/p/why-is-everyone-trying-to-build-a
78•crescit_eundo•3h ago•85 comments

The Alice and Bob After Dinner Speech (1984)

https://hex.ooo/library/alicebob.html
19•kamma4434•3d ago•3 comments

Go LLM SDK for streaming, tool-calling AI backends (plus frontend React lib)

https://github.com/grafana/ai-sdk
35•matryer•4h ago•13 comments

3D Pinball for Windows (1995)

https://98.js.org/programs/pinball/space-cadet.html
43•mushstory•4h ago•23 comments

The Glass Famine

https://edconway.substack.com/p/the-glass-famine
78•baud147258•3d ago•34 comments

CosmosEscape: Taking over Every Database in Azure Cosmos DB

https://www.wiz.io/blog/cosmosescape-taking-over-every-database-in-azure-cosmos-db
35•uvuv•3h ago•8 comments

Azulejo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azulejo
125•Amorymeltzer•1d ago•40 comments

The Lost Civic Life of Movie Rental Stores

https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/the-lost-civic-life-of-movie-rental-stores/
42•facundo_olano•1h ago•45 comments

You can't solve computer use by ignoring the interface

https://steelmanlabs.com/blog/computer-use-is-far-from-solved
40•mpavlov•4h ago•19 comments

Google will expand age checks on Android worldwide till the end of the year

https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/google-play-age-signals-api-safer-experiences.html
252•dmantis•5h ago•281 comments

Why DNA damage from smoking and UV rays cause cancer in some but not others

https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/study-reveals-why-dna-damage-from-smoking-and-uv-rays-may-cau...
44•gmays•1h ago•63 comments

The first watch featuring computer functions

https://by.seiko-design.com/140th/en/topic/58.html
67•stefanv•4d ago•28 comments

AI's top startups are barely publishing their research

https://www.science.org/content/article/ai-s-top-startups-are-barely-publishing-their-research
570•YeGoblynQueenne•18h ago•302 comments
Open in hackernews

Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots

https://deepmind.google/blog/gemini-robotics-2-brings-whole-body-intelligence-to-robots/
96•ai2027•50m ago

Comments

kaeland•41m ago
Wow, what a time to be alive!
I-M-S•24m ago
I would caution against enthusiasm. Anyone opposing those who end up controlling these robots won't be alive for long.
Cthulhu_•20m ago
These robots can't do combat, not effectively anyway, but that's already jumping three stages ahead, because first off, why would they?
SubiculumCode•37m ago
Now they are coming for the plumbers.
lnsru•20m ago
Still waiting for self driving car to bring me one robotic plumber to my construction site.
heaney-555•9m ago
You won't be waiting more than 5-10 years.
aabhay•36m ago
Can anyone that works on this technology provide an honest assessment of where this technology actually stands? How much instrumentation is actually required, what the interaction quality is, how much trouble do humanoids have with in the wild daily tasks like turning doorknobs, recovering from falls, avoiding knocking into things, etc.
utopiah•23m ago
IMHO the real test is if any robotic startup currently selling (or planning to sell) robots as a service for homes not just use it but gets returning users from it.

I did professionally few prototypes with robots and progress is real yet very far from what the average customer would find reliably useful in menial tasks.

FWIW I do think https://rodneybrooks.com/why-todays-humanoids-wont-learn-dex... remains relevant, namely dexterity is also a hardware problem, grippers aren't hands. They even clarify "multi-finger dexterous manipulation remains challenging." and those aren't even fingers with a lot of sensors.

p1esk•23m ago
It’s still at GPT-1 level, but GPT-2 moment feels imminent.
adityashankar•12m ago
I work in this field, and I wrote my bachelor's thesis here, not with humanoids but with VLAs (think chatgpt connected to a robot arm)

It's certainly not there yet for anything practical, there's also certain bits and structures that don't have accurate names during construction, and it is important to keep that in mind - so a robot is unlikely to understand what it means to say "put the left bit of this box onto this right bit" due to ambiguity, a human would understand that

Plus we have no good reliable accuracy testing data in most cases (most tests occur on a few demos, but that isn't a good representation of how must things work), popular benchmarks, such as libero have been saturated, and nearly everything gets 95% there, most companies and researchers have their own benchmarks here.

Plus companies lie alot, and do very dangerous things in thier videos, I.e. these robots should not be standing very close to humans, because of being dangerous.

There are also legitimate concerns of misuse of these robots that need to be accounted for, misuse does not have to be warfare, but can be as simple as confusing it while it is cutting tomatoes with a knife.

Turning doorknob is easy, and fail recovery is also being worked on, but we don't have reliable statistics anywhere on that. The hard part is on practical things, as in when placing bricks or attaching a part during manufacturing it needs to ensure that it is aligning everything correctly....and that's hard, while it is impressive, it is very irresponsible to keep humanoids at home (people are irresponsible when untrained), for example, lawnmowers injure about 6400 people a year...and that is not an everything machine.

Humanoids in general are...not appealing in specific, due to maintainable of joints, complexity, but robot arms in particular, expecially on wheels (check mobile aloha), are likely to be able to do tasks such as clean up in hotels, after a guest had left, or replace some cooks in restaurants (if their work is consistent)

horacemorace•36m ago
Fingers crossed this inspires a Chinese lab to release some weights so people can benefit.
martythemaniak•16m ago
They already do: https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen-robotsuite

Nvidia also releases their Cosmos series models.

RandomLensman•35m ago
> It can better detect when humans are nearby, trigger safety tool calls and bring the robot to a safe stop if someone approaches too closely.

If the robots stop when humans are too close, wouldn't that mean that robots for close interaction or handling of humans need a whole other level of control?

FartyMcFarter•34m ago
Yes. That's a whole other level of difficulty to accomplish safely.
officialchicken•28m ago
Also, "better" is doing a lot of lifting here, meaning it still fails regularly.
uejfiweun•35m ago
It's funny how Google is essentially trying to compete with the software side of Tesla only - Waymos (which AFAIK they plan to partner with major automakers), now this, etc.
xnx•27m ago
Seems smart. There are dozens of companies that make low-margin cars. There's only one company that has managed to make a working autonomous software driver.
FartyMcFarter•25m ago
Another way to look at it is that they're avoiding some of the expensive parts of making products that use AI, while leaning into their strengths. No Tesla required within the explanation.
dawnerd•20m ago
That makes it sound like Waymo is copying Tesla when in fact Waymo has been in the works before Tesla even considered self driving.
Rebuff5007•12m ago
Bizarre oversimplification.

For both manipulation and autonomous driving, google has invested in approaches with custom hardware, and off-the-shelf hardware, and a blend (which is what waymo is).

_davide_•33m ago
What's the point of "releasing it"? It only makes sense in the labs, and what would calling your APIs give "me" as a researcher, other than a baseline to beat? mah the model is real, but it feels 100% internal
jjice•32m ago
What's the point of not releasing it? Let people play with it and get some experience with it for a price.
LarsDu88•31m ago
All VLM, VLA models. I wonder if these architectures will reach prod before Yann LeCunn's world model JEPA startup even gets off the ground in Europe.
cowboy_henk•27m ago
A 36% success rate on screwing in a light bulb means there's probably something to LeCunn's take that VLM/VLA models aren't going to be the thing powering tomorrow's robots, but only time will tell.
LarsDu88•22m ago
Where did you get this perf metric? I couldn't find it in the release
striking•13m ago
Second chart (it's to the right of the first chart and clicking it to scroll is easier than otherwise)
heaney-555•10m ago
It's still very early days. There are many benchmarks that LLMs scored 36% on just 18 months ago that they're now at 100% on.
swframe2•22m ago
Welsh Labs has a great video on JEPA and robotics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYkIdXwW2AE
FartyMcFarter•28m ago
These robots look slow and not very fluid in their motions, but LLMs like ChatGPT also looked very dumb initially. If progress is as fast as LLMs , this could have massive applications in a few years.
pwython•26m ago
For house keeping tasks the robotics companies love showing off... it honestly doesn't matter if it takes a robot longer than a human to clean your house. As long as it gets done before you get home from work, no big deal.
Cthulhu_•22m ago
Yeah, the dishwasher takes much longer to do the dishes than I do by hand, but that's cool. That said, the dishwasher is out of the way.

I don't think we'll get household robots anytime soon. Hell, the only ones that can afford them will be the same that would hire human household help.

FartyMcFarter•20m ago
> Hell, the only ones that can afford them will be the same that would hire human household help.

But maybe they'd rather deal with a robot than a human?

RandomLensman•16m ago
Honestly: why?
terio•9m ago
Less liability?
CapyToolkit•23m ago
If it has intelligence of Gemini... well, good luck...
dev0p•9m ago
Gemini is the only LLM I've ever experienced that decided on its own to tell me that something was a bad idea. Which, ok, in itself it's not a bad thing, we actually need more of that instead of the pathological sycophancy that all current models suffer from.

But in a physical robot? Yeah, that thing is going to punch me in the face, eventually. Or worse.

defrim•23m ago
We're getting closer
logankeenan•19m ago
Robotics with AI is the real revolution.

Today, humans convert their labor to capital. Capital holders need labor (humans) to acquire more capital. When the price of inference for these robots becomes less than the price of labor then capital holders don’t need labor.

Obviously, AI impacts non-manual labor too, but a significant portion of the world population does manual labor.

ausbah•17m ago
and this is good?
wffurr•15m ago
It's good for capital holders. It does imply a further shift in the distribution of wealth though with all the attendant implications thereof.

I question the premise that humanoid robots are "around the corner". I suspect this will turn out more like self-driving cars which are still a very slow burn.

andsoitis•6m ago
If all goes well, imagine a world in which you work because you want to not because you have to.
RandomLensman•11m ago
Not sure it is just about inference costs, errors in handling things and beings in the real world have a very different "surface" from immaterial applications - robots might need to have failsafes, independent limiters, etc. there.
aavci•19m ago
Can someone that uses these models provide some tips or docs on how best to get to use these at home to test around? Is the best thing a virtual environment?
prima-facie•14m ago
A lot of these household tasks could be automated without the need for humanoid robots. Roombas can clean your floor, automated rubbish disposal can be integrated into houses and flats, grocery delivery and storage could be done via an automated intake, cataloguing, and storage system. Humanoids are just creepy and you can't really trust them.

Could you sleep easily knowing that you have one in your house? What if you oppose the political views of its creators?

heaney-555•11m ago
>automated rubbish disposal can be integrated into houses and flats, grocery delivery and storage could be done via an automated intake, cataloguing, and storage system

This is a complete non-starter for already-built apartment blocks, terraced homes, and even most semi-detached. It's an interesting but costly solution for new detached homes.

Humanoids are a useful form factor because the already-built human world is, definitionally, built for humanoids.

andsoitis•9m ago
Deepbody
fernly•5m ago
Relevant: A San Francisco company is advertising humanoid robot housecleaning services[1]. However those 'bots require local supervision and a human controller watching through its video feed.

Presumably that company could use the Gemini Robotics product to eliminate the remote controller.

[1] https://www.tau-robotics.com/

gradus_ad•4m ago
Is the fundamental challenge for AI directed movement in 3D space the continuity of the environment? Vs LLM's which train on discrete and limited token sets.
seasox•8m ago
Robots don‘t steal and don‘t want a raise.
iinnPP•4m ago
The list of plausible answers is long enough as to question why you felt the need to include the word honestly, irony? One example: social anxiety.
FartyMcFarter•4m ago
I don't want a person I don't know very well in my space.

Even if I find a person who's good and reliable, they might move away, switch jobs etc. It has all the headaches that come with employing someone, because, well, it is exactly that...

qurren•15m ago
I'm bearish that they'll be economically viable in the house for a very long time.

For businesses the bar for adoption is very low: If the thing can work repetitive jobs for 24 hours a day and replace 3 shifts, the purchase bar is nominally anything less than 3 x human salary if your budgeting horizon is 1 year. That's a high number, and probably fairly easy to achieve.

For homes, it's a very different bar. You'd have a hard time convincing most American families to purchase anything with a >$1000 price tag. Currently that's pretty much impossible for a humanoid.

doctorpangloss•13m ago
> it honestly doesn't matter if it takes a robot longer than a human to clean your house

it depends. in order for my slow ass Roomba to clean my floors, I have to move a bunch of things out of the way and not use the room.

on the flip side, i think this "the robot cannot automate the whole task" thing is reductive too. suffice it to say, EVERYTHING matters, there honestly nothing that "honestly doesn't matter."

millerm•10m ago
Exactly. People buy those automated circular floor vacuums. Anyone can get it done with a regular broom/vacuum in a small fraction of the time it takes for those things. Just like I drive an electric car. It charges while I sleep. It doesn't matter if an ICE can fuel in a few minutes.
cute_boi•21m ago
yes at 1k tok/sec i think these robots will be fast and very fluid.
GaggiX•18m ago
I believe that it's also for safety, these robots would easily destroy themselves if not restrained (and cause damage).
ChaitanyaSai•15m ago
We don't get virtuous feedback loops in hardware though. Muscles are incredible engineering that took half a billion years. Token generation (speech) is low hundred thousands maybe. Unless of course improved AI navigates the space of ideas so well that it can give us alloys or synthetic flesh that does twitch as fast...