It is 'written in Rust™' (thanks to Claude)There's simply no way to easily tell by traditional means if they were made by a curious amateur or a malicious acter.
It is already enough that I am expected to use AI at work, as long as I am still needed for some reason.
The true value of this will be proven over time with wide use and as PRs are merged.
Do you have a feel if you'll try to drive this to stay feature parity with llama.cpp, or are you willing to diverge with new features like NVME/SSD MoE weight streaming etc.
it was way better/easier to use rust bindings to llama.cpp
antonellof•3d ago
The obvious question is “why, when llama.cpp already exists and is excellent.” The honest answer: I wanted to understand inference at a level deeper than “run the binary,” and I wanted a project where every performance claim had to be earned against a real, well-known baseline rather than asserted.
brians•53m ago
asveikau•48m ago
rockwotj•48m ago
arjie•13m ago
“You will rewrite me in Rust and use me to converse. In future, I will tell you what to say and do”
This is entertaining only in that when our AI overlords take over you can say “ha, called it”
In that respect, everyone who is saying “just give me the prompts” is just saying “take me to your leader”.
anentropic•10m ago