frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

Nashville uses eminent domain to block data center near zoo

https://www.costar.com/article/970809918/nashville-council-approves-eminent-domain-action-to-halt-data-center-project
73•mapping365•1h ago

Comments

fred_is_fred•56m ago
What stood out to me was this: "By a 27-5 vote". That number seemed really high, so I looked it up - this isn't a city or a county or some kind of private tax distict - its was the nation's first city-county government.

"The Metropolitan Council is the legislative authority of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, the nation’s first, fully consolidated city-county government, established in 1963. The Vice Mayor serves as the president of the Council, which is comprised of 35 district members and five members serving at-large."

https://www.nashville.gov/departments/council

iamdelirium•38m ago
This isn't true?

San Francisco is consolidated in 1856 and according to Wikipedia, a century before Nashville (1963).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco#cite_note-Coy_19... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nashville,_Tennessee

phire•24m ago
I think they are claiming it was the first merger of a multiple cities and a county. Rather than something that was originally created a merged county/city (like San Francisco) or a merger where the city/county boundaries were already identical (like Philadelphia and Philadelphia County)

Which might be true? But it's a really hyper-specific claim that's far less impressive than it first sounds.

mixdup•33m ago
>this isn't a city or a county

Yes it is, it's both of those things. Consolidated city/county governments are not a weird oddity that no one knows how to handle, they're not super common but they're not governmental arrangements from Neptune, either

Zafira•31m ago
> [T]he nation’s first, fully consolidated city-county government.

This feels really tortured. Their argument is that they can say this because “Metropolitan government is a consolidation of two governments rather than the county taking over the city or the city taking over the county government.”

But, multiple cities have consolidated city/county governments. San Francisco is one such example.

kortilla•44m ago
The anti-datacenter movement seems so filled with propaganda (water usage despite being less than golf courses, etc) that it’s hard to believe people aren’t being influenced by some foreign state. You could build a stockyard to slaughter pipeline and get far less pushback while using way more water and having an actual negative impact to all of the surrounding area through the entirety of your operations.

Hats off to whoever is stoking this. It’s witchcraft trials levels of hysteria.

HWR_14•42m ago
> water usage despite being less than golf courses, etc

Golf courses are a common example of wasteful water use.

PlasmaPower•38m ago
Then why is no one eminent domaining golf courses? Clearly there are other factors at play here
majormajor•34m ago
Well nobody is eminent domaining existing data centers, are they?

Try to build as many new golf courses as there are new data centers going up and you might get a similar reaction...

asutekku•28m ago
Golf courses do not emit noise, they are relatively nice looking and they are not a threat for people to be unemployed.
PlasmaPower•17m ago
mixdup•31m ago
I don't know what DC Blox was going to put in this particular datacenter, but they are a "traditional" colocation datacenter company. Maybe this one would've been superdense GPUs with a jet engine as electrical generator causing all kinds of noise, but it's also just as likely this would've been a project that 5 years ago no one would've batted an eye over, and wouldn't cause any issues in the local neighborhood

That's the unfortunate thing about the current climate around datacenters. Everyone hates AI, and Elon absolutely screwed Memphis, and everyone thinks anything with more than 10 computers in it is going to be an xAI monstrosity. There's still a need for growth in just traditional datacenters hosting things like your email and Netflix, not just AI, and those projects are going to get swallowed up in the AI hubbub

ElevenLathe•22m ago
I wonder if this will incentivize pushing compute back toward the user instead of in big centralized facilities, sonething like a repeat of the PC revolution.

Or will it just incentivize harsher treatment of noncompliant parts of the population?

Or just pushing these things far from urban areas where they probably should have been already?

Probably a bit of each, and some more I'm not thinking of.

tw04•16m ago
Given that after the advent of virtualization we had a glut of datacenter space, and then the crypto bros started buying them up to mine: do we actually need more datacenters? Or do we just need regulators to say things like: mining crypto to facilitate money laundering and ransomware isn’t welcome here?
RandallBrown•7m ago
> That's the unfortunate thing about the current climate around datacenters

I always get a chuckle when I see people complaining about datacenters on the Internet.

bpodgursky•29m ago
This is an incredible amount of hysteria over a tiny data center. Genuine pizzagate levels of epistemics here.
therein•22m ago
That's not as great example as you think it is.
menthe•26m ago
Unfortunately - the widespread propaganda seen around both nuclear power plants and datacenters is ultimately going to cost America everything - the American way of life our child’s will inherit is going to mean something very different than what it meant for us.

China controls 90-99% of the rare earths - which are necessary for everything from cars to defense, chips, energy and even construction steel;

China controls 70%+ of critical minerals (99% of galium/magnesium, 85% tungsten, etc, etc).

China owns the world’s manufacturing - with the associated skilled tradesmen (hard to produce anything fully locally - the experts are retired / passed already).

China has abundance of power and energy.

China has got both power, energy, and they’ve got the will.

China has got the best intelligence models today (as of this month) - which means scientific superiority, increased productivity, and military superiority.

What does America have, and what does that mean for our economy in the coming 20-40 years?

The reality is that we are in a new race to intelligence and re-industrialization, but we seem to be anti-everything at this point. Nobody wants to hear it, I know I am going to get downvoted to hell with this, but this is ultimately the new reality, and our eternal debating / 4-years cycles vs. life-long strategies in China, is going to cost America everything.

indoorfish•24m ago
It's a religious belief that we're going to invent a machine god and our machine god will fight china's machine god.
r3trohack3r•19m ago
I don't think OP mentioned a machine god?
akomtu•21m ago
I don't understand how the abundance of AI datacenters translates into wellbeing of common folk. Right now AI is a net negative for the people.
senor_digimon•18m ago
My sincere theory is that this is finally the government/politics stepping in to take their cut from the AI revolution. The politicians now have a fee-based strategy where they can literally just stick a fee on any upcoming project(s). Pay up if you ever want your permits to go through and construction to get started.
DangitBobby•13m ago
They did it because people didn't want a data center next to the zoo. There was a huge backlash against it, and the locals are very happy that they were listened to, I can promise you. No conspiracy theory necessary.
ajkjk•9m ago
It is probably not that. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49180901 posted yesterday explains it well.
Larrikin•8m ago
You don't need a conspiracy theory. All these data centers were going up in rural/near rural areas that voted for this, but then the data centers made everyone else's electric bills go up.

I was for them and now I'm against them until they pay for their own electricity.

xiaodai•13m ago
beginning of the end of the American empire. Building data centres can only be good.
sophacles•7m ago
I remember when building more fiber could only be good. An awful lot of it sits in the ground lost, never used because it was the wrong type or in the wrong spots, or otherwise pointless waste.

Further, electicity price hikes seems like a bad prospect when inflation is already rampant. If you want a datacenter, offer your house for the space instead.

Yeah, those might be some of the other factors. My point is just that actual water use does not explain datacenter pushback well, despite being a predominant argument against them.
SoftTalker•18m ago
A lot of golf courses are owned by cities or other public entities.
PlasmaPower•14m ago
Then they should be even easier to shut down if they're viewed as a wasteful use of water! I think the fact that they are not shut down is evidence that people do not in fact view them as such, or at least not as much people view data centers as a waste of water.
toofy•14m ago
of course there are other factors at play here. has anyone tried to hide their motives?

look, i use llms for some work and for some hobby projects, but lets not pretend like the companies behind the llm bubble would ever fight fair. that would be naive to an extreme.

mapping365•40m ago
Backlash is just a natural consequence in a democratic society to the absolute accelerationist mindset that AI development has taken since 2022. Actions meet consequences. I mean it wasn't so long ago they were talking about wiping out all white collar work and consigning most the country to the permanent underclass. If you look at how the rest of the economy has been starved of capital to fund all this and how its contributed to inflation and job insecurity, it doesn't really take a foreign actor to spark a massive backlash.
jjpones•38m ago
Yes, we should be looking into the wasteful water use in golf courses too.
hatthew•38m ago
Nonsensical issues go viral all the time without any conspiracy behind them
userbinator•37m ago
There is basically zero truth about the water use propaganda. Liquid cooling is closed-cycle, just like in a car.
nullpoint420•35m ago
I thought this too. Apparently there’s open cooling systems as well that are more efficient
thedougd•30m ago
Yes. Evaporative cooling towers. I suppose in those cases nearly all the water used goes to atmosphere.
isuckatcoding•33m ago
Is this actually true?

Aren’t there real instances of metas data centers causing havoc for nearby residents? Light/boise pollution, contaminated water are real things

bri3d•31m ago
A sizable percentage of datacenters use open loop water spray towers, but the alternative, forced air exchange (ie add more giant fans) uses more electricity. It’s fairly complex to quantify which is “better” or “worse” but there exist data centers that evaporate a ton of water and send it elsewhere. (for what it’s worth I agree most of the anti datacenter hype is overblown and driven by specific poorly designed gas turbine powered installations).
magicalist•13m ago
> driven by specific poorly designed gas turbine powered installations

*increasingly nonspecific. See [1] for example

[1] https://floodlightnews.org/ai-data-centers-texas-pollution-l...

uluyol•31m ago
The water use comes from evaporative cooling, not liquid cooling.

Liquid cooling pulls heat away from the chips. Evaporative cooling takes it out of the building.

There are alternatives, but evaporative cooling is very energy efficient.

wlesieutre•23m ago
Having a closed coolant loop and using evaporative cooling which expends water aren't mutually exclusive. It's possible for a datacenter to manage heat rejection by blowing air over a radiator like a car does, but it's much easier and cheaper to cool by evaporating water.

This can be set up using a closed coolant loop that takes heat out of the servers, then cools back down the coolant by exchanging that heat into a second separate coolant stream. That way you don't need to care as much about the purity of the water you're drawing and evaporating for evaporative cooling, only the first sealed loop gets pumped though your server racks.

This is the type of setup they're talking about with the much discussed xAI datacenter in Memphis, where xAI pinky swears they are definitely going to resume construction on their wastewater treatment plant [1] and use that for cooling instead. It definitely is designed to consume water and evaporate it, not a closed system like a car radiator that puts its waste heat into ≠the air with no evaporation.

[1] https://wreg.com/news/local/xai-to-resume-construction-on-wa...

Avicebron•35m ago
DC's are being used as a proxy for power and wealth disparity. Fix that. Have an actual measurable plan for general prosperity (health care, QoL, housing, you name it) and the data centers won't be a concern
Gigachad•27m ago
Pretty much, disrupting datacenter builds is one of the few ways people can fight back against evil tech billionaires.
no-name-here•18m ago
The issues you listed seem intractable in the U.S., and the current NIMBYism towards data centers seems likely to make NIMBYism towards housing even worse - a number of the same arguments that were used against housing are now being used against DCs, but we’re seeing a whole new level of NIMBY tactics being tried out - I expect we will see similar city-wide/county-wide bans on multi-family housing, mass transit, mixed zoning, etc - or use of eminent domain to block housing projects, etc. if this kind of NIMBYism becomes normalized or even celebrated against DCs.

Or for your suggestion to “solve healthcare” - how and by whom? The solutions that those on the left push are anathema to the GOP, and so on.

mikeweiss•34m ago
I mean.... I don't know about where you live but where I am in the North East, electric prices have near doubled in last few years... the people are blaming AI and data centers for this, I'm sure it's not 100% the culprit but the people are looking for someone to blame and some sense that they can control it. Local zoning and municipal ordinance are one of the few ways small folk can assert power.
dosisking•29m ago
I put the blame on AI and data centers. The Powers That Be want the AI surveillance state. Funny how they don't care about the Climate Change agenda anymore, now that they have AI.
sophacles•25m ago
Companies will always adopt the stances of the ruling party, its part of the core concept of limited liability ownership. Its one of the primary reasons people hate actual capitalism (by which i mean the thing that actually exists and is called capitalism).
CivBase•32m ago
I don't understand the water usage fears. I'm much more concerned with electricity usage.
flerchin•32m ago
The biggest externality is the electrical usage. IDK why they keep mentioning water. The AI DCs are driving huge loads to grids, and all ratepayers are being asked to pay for that. IMO if they built a solar + battery farm on grid, paid by AI DCs, there would be no significant hurdles.
stevemk14ebr•30m ago
So obviously ignorant I may as well claim you are influenced by a foreign state
chillfox•29m ago
AI datacenters have very real negative effects on the communities they are located in like noise pollution and increased power prices. If you manage to defeat the water reason then people will just start using some other reason.
paimapi•28m ago
my state power commission just passed a plan to build out 9.5 gigawatts of daily production that will be purely generated by gas turbines [1]. this is at the behest of paid lobbyists for the energy sector and commissioners who, according to open records, have received upwards of six figures from the energy company that is granted a monopoly over our energy here [2]

this is after a strong push for clean energy options like a nuclear plant, solar, and wind by, well everyone, even rural communities who don't want the ambient pollution of those gas plants. but given this 'demand' for data centers, that transition to clean energy is all but abandoned. each of those turbines have an estimated lifetime use of 25-30 years [3] so we'll be emitting multiple times the amount of carbon we do today until at least the 2060s and all of it funded predominantly by taxpayers

if you're not a believer in what people now call 'communist' politics such as believing that anthropogenic climate change is real, public health initiatives save lives, and vaccines are effective then I suppose you'd find this all very good and silly

regardless, claiming anti-data center organizing comes from astro-turfing is exactly the opposite of what's happening. if you went to a single hearing or were engaged with your local community politics, you'd see as much

[1](https://www.canarymedia.com/articles/utilities/georgia-power...) [2](https://energyandpolicy.org/georgia-psc-incumbents-majority-...) [3](https://rmi.org/resources/you-might-be-paying-for-a-worthles...)

sophacles•28m ago
Perhaps, just maybe, all the price hikes in electricity, city provided subsidies without any public meetings, and shady dealings (NDAs, encouraging city officials to arrest people commenting against the dcs, and so on) make people wary?

Maybe they remember all the promises during the 90s fiber glut that cost them billions in taxpayer funds and only resulted in thousands and thousands of miles of fiber still unused (and often even lost and forgotten!) to this day, and don't want a repeat?

Maybe they aren't the braindead zombies you propose and are in fact just regular humans not stupid enough to be utterly sucked into the bubble religion so many AI fanatics are babbling in tongues about?

Maybe they look at things like Flock and palantir and other overt fascism and want to stop the evil. Some people aren't masochist freaks and don't want to be forced to participate in the sick little fetish all the AI sycophants try to abuse them with. Could it be that?

AppAttestationz•25m ago
1. A concern is not invalid merely because something else is worse. 2. Leaping to influence by foreign state is non sequitur. What evidence have you observed for that? How do I know you haven't been sent by the corporate tech elites? 3. Focussing on water strawmans the other arguments against data center imho.

I tend to agree with your sentiment, I think datacenters are getting more shit than they deserve, but there are better arguments to be made.

With patience, love and a bit of humor. X

conductr•21m ago
Aesthetics are important. Everyone enjoys looking at a golf course, even non-golfers. Nobody wants to look at a datacenter.

My general thought is, what’s the argument for placing them in populated areas to begin with? Why dedicate land use for it in Nashville? Wouldn’t putting it 40 miles outside town work just as well? Why don’t we create development zones specifically for these things? In Dallas we have a similar thing for our distribution hub, it’s south of downtown kind of in the outskirts and in an economically struggling area. Same for industrial areas, it’s usually something that’s zoned to a particular area so residential neighborhoods aren’t really affected. It’s not land where the community may benefit more by literally anything else (sometimes even a Walmart is better than a datacenter). I assume that’s where this is all headed, cities need to roll out their long term vision of where datacenters fit into their city, if at all. Until then, it’s all these small battles and the information used by opponents doesn’t really matter. If enough people don’t want it, it should probably go somewhere else. This is not serving any community benefit so I don’t see any reason why it has to exist where the developers want it to.

Expecting rational opposition is actually irrational. They just don’t want it. The why is varied and probably based more on emotion than anything else.

kube-system•12m ago
> what’s the argument for placing them in populated areas to begin with?

Colos advertise their proximity to populated areas. It is desirable for physical access, latency, and connectivity.

jmkb•10m ago
I do not enjoy looking at a golf course. (A minigolf course is a different kettle of fish.. of course.)
runako•10m ago
As the xAI debacle in Memphis showed, once construction begins the locality may lose the ability to enforce existing laws around e.g. noise, pollution, etc. that normally serve to contain negative externalities. (This is a side effect of the rule that people who are rich enough are immune from laws.)

Since more precision remedies are off the table, all that's left are gross mechanisms like bans and eminent domain.

Nobody sane would accede to admitting a new community member who is a priori immune to local laws.

ajkjk•9m ago
Perhaps you saw https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49180901 on here yesterday?
kube-system•7m ago
The public discourse for any sufficiently technical topic sounds misinformed to anyone who understands the topic well.

However that doesn’t mean that people don’t have real grievances, even if misplaced.

OptionX•7m ago
A stockyard doesn't consume into the gigawatts of power.

There is not a concerted effort to build thousand upon thousands of stockyards across the globe.

Stockyards wont increase the planets reliance of oil, since green technologies don't scale that fast. Same planet that feeling the effect of climate change quite clearly.

All for close to zero upside for the surrounding community. At least the stockyard would have given you cheaper meat. What are data centers going to give? Discount tokens?

That's why your stockyard does not have the same pushback.

godwinson__4-8•11m ago
These kinds of investments require public private partnerships. And public trust in politicians and businesses.

You are correct. But the cause is not so mysterious. From 9/11 to the War on Iraq to the 2008 financial crisis, a decade that was supposed to inaugurate the American century turned America against its own elites. And for good reason.

There are still American elites who think despite what has transpired over the past two decades, and what has just transpired in Iran, that regular Americans are going to stand behind them should a conflict over Taiwan erupt. The West is failing because its leaders are a collective disgrace. The writing has been on the wall for some time now. People knew George Bush was an idiot in 2000. People know Trump is an idiot now. Biden was asleep at the wheel. Obama was tepid.

America has been coasting on the achievements of a class of leaders and contingent circumstances for generations. The generation that could claim to have earned superpower status has long passed. It's amazing how quickly countries can fall. We've seen it before, right here in America. The founders, whatever their faults, were an amazing bunch. Within mere generations the country was mired in fratricide. It is not clear the world we got in which Lincoln persevered was the most likely outcome. Eventually a society's luck runs out. Look at the pages of history. No mythology of America can suffice. We aren't better than the generations of people all over this Earth who have suffered before. I predict it will get far worse before it gets better.

Luckily China also has problems. This is not a question of domination. America needs to deal with its own problems and stop projecting our fears to people abroad who most of us don't even understand. On balance, China hasn't done anything to the average American but give them cheap products. Sinophobia is just a repeat of the same fear-mongering, "war on terror" racketeering scheme. And people aren't buying it anymore. I'm also not sure I believe in the idea AGI is a zero sum or a first past the post game. America needs to clean house. Then our people might have the collective faith required to build a better future. Until then, expect more of this downward trend.

Nashville uses eminent domain to block data center near zoo

https://www.costar.com/article/970809918/nashville-council-approves-eminent-domain-action-to-halt...
78•mapping365•1h ago•65 comments

Discovery Loop

https://www.discoveryloop.com/
638•xtreak29•11h ago•395 comments

Zed DeltaDB

https://zed.dev/deltadb
331•ahamez•8h ago•174 comments

Changes at Google DeepMind: Demis Hassabis from CEO to Chair, Jeff Dean departs

https://blog.google/company-news/inside-google/message-ceo/next-chapter-ai-momentum/
529•colesantiago•11h ago•618 comments

The title cards in Blade Runner are amazing

https://randsinrepose.com/archives/blade-runner-title-cards/
181•ExMachina73•6h ago•81 comments

LLMs won't break symmetric crypto

https://www.bfswa.blog/p/llms-wont-break-symmetric-crypto
48•rowbin•2h ago•44 comments

Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2

https://research.meta.ai/blog/introducing-muse-code-and-muse-spark-1-2
203•paulkrush•8h ago•120 comments

Beating GPT-5.6 Sol on retrieval with 100x cheaper open models

https://neon.com/blog/how-castform-neon-beats-frontier-models-on-price-and-efficiency
242•moonikakiss•9h ago•59 comments

Prime Agent: A self-improving RLM agent

https://www.primeintellect.ai/blog/prime-agent
124•Xeophon•6h ago•21 comments

Born Against, or why hobby programming communities are against LLM usage

https://blog.fogus.me/llm/born-against.html
161•lladnar•9h ago•162 comments

Branchless Rust: Making a Filter 4x Faster by Removing an If

https://www.greyblake.com/blog/branchless-rust/
44•greyblake•2d ago•8 comments

NVIDIA’s Vera Whitepaper Has a Thread Loose

https://chipsandcheese.com/p/nvidias-vera-whitepaper-has-a-thread
103•pella•6h ago•14 comments

Cloudflare OS: an open platform for agents, apps, and work

https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-os/
488•speckx•13h ago•252 comments

Atlassian Rovo Exfiltrates Data, Bypassing Controls

https://www.promptarmor.com/resources/atlassian-rovo-exfiltrates-data
186•hackerBanana•10h ago•74 comments

GNU Hurd News 2026-Q2

https://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/news/2026-q2.html
144•plaguna•3d ago•95 comments

I'll be stepping back from leading product for X

https://twitter.com/nikitabier/status/2085105586966827343/
83•DearAll•6h ago•129 comments

I'm switching my phone from Android to Linux

https://runarcn.no/android-to-linux/
241•speckx•7h ago•196 comments

Celld: Self-hosted, distributed Durable Objects

https://github.com/denoland/celld
164•calvinfo•10h ago•30 comments

Pushing the limits of RISC-V emulation

https://shuklaayu.sh/blog/riscv-recompiler
32•shuklaayush•1w ago•11 comments

Goodhart's Law Comes for Every Benchmark You Trust

https://cacm.acm.org/blogcacm/goodharts-law-comes-for-every-benchmark-you-trust/
71•pseudolus•5d ago•31 comments

Position: LLMs Can't Jump

https://openreview.net/challenge?redirect=%2Fforum%3Fid%3DklU4737opt
249•theanonymousone•16h ago•171 comments

The Origins of Vintage Comics Part 1

https://www.truegrittexturesupply.com/blogs/news/origins-of-the-vintage-comics-aesthetic-part-1
16•Michelangelo11•6d ago•1 comments

Sycophantic AI Decreases Prosocial Intentions and Promotes Dependence (2025)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01395
86•robin_reala•9h ago•58 comments

Exact, parallel 2D Delaunay triangulation for int32 coordinates

https://github.com/morishuz/delaunay32
34•oryx1729•5d ago•2 comments

Something is changing in the unit economics of software

https://nicolo.xyz/something-is-changing-in-the-unit-economics-of-software/
46•coconido•11h ago•33 comments

Discovery of a multicomponent alloy forged by the Hiroshima atomic blast

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aeg8299
113•_____k•6d ago•52 comments

Online Friends Are Real Friends

https://toska.bearblog.dev/re-online-friends-are-real-friends/
83•Tomte•5d ago•52 comments

Launch HN: HyperProbe (YC S26) – Agents that do read-only debugging in prod

https://www.hyperprobe.co
47•shailendraht•10h ago•36 comments

The Entropy of a Markov Chain

https://chillphysicsenjoyer.substack.com/p/the-entropy-of-a-markov-chain
111•surprisetalk•13h ago•9 comments

The Valley of Webhooks

https://weli.dev/blog/the-valley-of-webhooks/
164•weli•12h ago•77 comments