frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Qwen3.8 Max now ranked as the best overall model by agentic index

https://artificialanalysis.ai/?intelligence=agentic-index
64•apitman•42m ago•26 comments

Mario Meets Pareto

https://www.mayerowitz.io/blog/mario-meets-pareto
710•theanonymousone•8h ago•134 comments

Launch HN: ProvenMetal (YC S26) delivers circuit boards in days instead of weeks

https://provenmetal.com
122•willcarkner•3h ago•88 comments

Almost no skill required to cook a steak

https://blog.sydorets.com/en/posts/almost-no-skill-required-to-cook-a-steak/
143•yusyd•3h ago•180 comments

GitHub Is Experiencing Difficulties

https://www.githubstatus.com/?d=2026/08/06
36•Jeaye•2h ago•16 comments

Crime Pays but Botany Doesn't

https://www.crimepaysbutbotanydoesnt.com/reading-list
572•DarkContinent•14h ago•178 comments

The Simple Elegance of the Integrated Timing Belt Loopback Fastener

https://danielmangum.com/posts/integrated-timing-belt-loopback-fastener/
61•hasheddan•4d ago•14 comments

How to Make a Nintendo 64 Game in 2026

https://phoboslab.org/log/2026/08/xibalba64-making-of
399•atan2•2d ago•170 comments

Federal Communications Commission scraps limit on broadcast TV ownership

https://www.nbcnews.com/business/media/federal-communications-commission-scraps-limit-broadcast-t...
35•pseudolus•1h ago•28 comments

Improving GPT-5.6 Sol in ChatGPT—and expanding access for free users

https://openai.com/index/improving-gpt-5-6-sol-in-chatgpt/
20•tedsanders•2h ago•6 comments

Learn how chips are made with this Rollercoaster Tycoon-inspired animation

https://laurentiugabriel.github.io/ChipTycoon/
16•laurentiurad•6d ago•0 comments

Show HN: The Channels SDK – Bring Any Agent to Any Channel (Slack, MS Teams)

https://github.com/CopilotKit/channels-sdk
57•davidmckayv•3h ago•17 comments

Pareto Front

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_front
190•binyu•1w ago•82 comments

Humans missed 1 in 3 threats approving AI agent commands across 40k game runs

https://scalex.dev/blog/ai-agent-permissions-stats/
202•Wirbelwind•7h ago•164 comments

Building progressively enhanced forms using Htmx

https://www.rafa.ee/articles/progressive-enhanced-forms-htmx/
19•mpweiher•6d ago•3 comments

Discovery Loop

https://www.discoveryloop.com/
881•xtreak29•1d ago•559 comments

My phone detects going on a run as "someone snatching my phone and running off"

https://mastodon.gamedev.place/@rygorous/117047697255584965
37•luu•1h ago•42 comments

Changes at Google DeepMind: Demis Hassabis from CEO to Chair, Jeff Dean departs

https://blog.google/company-news/inside-google/message-ceo/next-chapter-ai-momentum/
802•colesantiago•1d ago•856 comments

Zapscape (CVE-2026-64561)

https://github.com/V4bel/Zapscape
38•john_strinlai•3h ago•5 comments

Dress made of living mycelium can renew and repair itself

https://www.dezeen.com/2026/08/05/dress-living-mycelium-renew-repair/
43•speckx•2h ago•30 comments

Poles of Inaccessibility in the San Gabriel Mountains

https://notes.secretsauce.net/notes/2015/05/06_poles-of-inaccessibility-in-the-san-gabriel-mounta...
22•dima55•4d ago•15 comments

Unearthing my 1996 windowed OS in machine code for Am29000 homebrew computer

https://nanochess.org/the_am29000_computer.html
123•nanochess•5d ago•31 comments

The title cards in Blade Runner are amazing

https://randsinrepose.com/archives/blade-runner-title-cards/
397•ExMachina73•21h ago•194 comments

Beating GPT-5.6 Sol on retrieval with 100x cheaper open models

https://neon.com/blog/how-castform-neon-beats-frontier-models-on-price-and-efficiency
411•moonikakiss•1d ago•114 comments

Born Against, or why hobby programming communities are against LLM usage

https://blog.fogus.me/llm/born-against.html
385•lladnar•1d ago•445 comments

Unions Can Save Tech Workers and Tech Work

https://jacobin.com/2026/08/uc-upte-tech-workers-union
11•ughitsaaron•54m ago•0 comments

Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2

https://research.meta.ai/blog/introducing-muse-code-and-muse-spark-1-2
314•paulkrush•1d ago•239 comments

Cloudflare OS: an open platform for agents, apps, and work

https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-os/
638•speckx•1d ago•315 comments

Join Me in Jamverse

https://contraptions.venkateshrao.com/p/join-me-in-jamverse
33•surprisetalk•6d ago•10 comments

Taste Is All That's Left

https://notashelf.dev/posts/taste-is-all-thats-left
4•tsak•2h ago•2 comments
Open in hackernews

Federal Communications Commission scraps limit on broadcast TV ownership

https://www.nbcnews.com/business/media/federal-communications-commission-scraps-limit-broadcast-tv-ownership-rcna587641
35•pseudolus•1h ago

Comments

lenerdenator•56m ago
Yet another thing to be undone when Trump leaves office.
mmmpetrichor•49m ago
From what I've read, its blatantly illegal. So probably will be undone by the courts in a few months. I wonder if anyone has a list of illegal things this white house has mandated that were overturned and rebuked by the courts soon after.
java-man•47m ago
Guess who is packing the courts right now?
krapp•44m ago
It has its own wikipedia page, unsurprisingly: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_the_second_Tr...
altcognito•45m ago
In an ideal world we would roll back to the 1996 telecommunications laws. (or something approximating a sensible approach to less narrow share of the broadcast spectrum)

I think anybody with a gripe about "mainstream media" should really examine who owns most of the media (billionaires) and see the value in enforcing that more indepedent voices are heard, not less as the past three decades has been a relentless march towards.

The whole idea with the advent of the internet was that there would be so many more ways to be heard. That's been kinda true, but the public airwaves are dominated by corporate voices.

BigTTYGothGF•14m ago
I'd like to think a democratic president would have the appetite to do that.
trollbridge•41m ago
Broadcast TV seems laughably irrelevant. It’s difficult to find official numbers, but under 1% of US households have no cable, satellite TV, home Internet, or a cell phone. The latter two are how people consume video and TV to a large degree today.

In exchange, we have a great deal of spectrum tied up for terrestrial TV, much of which goes to running infomercials or else is surreptitiously leased for terrestrial data broadcasts. And the government gets to decide to regulate it so it becomes inherently politicised - like favouring certain owners.

Realistically - this spectrum should simply be reassigned for IP based services, with perhaps some set aside for non profit / educational uses, some for commercial, etc.

(Radio is pretty much the same boat but I can see a case to be made for keeping some analog FM radio broadcasts. The 6MHz per channel for TV is insane.)

dyauspitr•34m ago
> but under 1% of US households have no cable, satellite TV, home Internet, or a cell phone.

Why are you bundling all those things together? The only thing we care about here is cable or satellite TV for your argument.

eigencoder•33m ago
Those are all the things that replace broadcast TV
trollbridge•22m ago
Because someone with access to those things has no need for rabbit ears.

Broadcast TV today is a stream of bytes. The same stream can be delivered via cable, satellite, a cell phone, or home Internet.

wmf•28m ago
freediddy•32m ago
I haven't watched broadcast TV in over a decade, except for live sports. I also haven't listened to broadcast radio in even longer. My teenage children don't know how to use the TV or radio. It's like someone telling me a company has a monopoly on the telephone lines; nostalgic for me but utterly useless in 2026.
s0ss•10m ago
most people aren't hn readers. broadcast tv is far from useless in 2026, that's how many normies watch tv.
mulmen•3m ago
[delayed]
sleepybrett•27m ago
of course they do. Prepare for sinclair to own everything.
magicalist•7m ago
Note that Tom Delay of all people (remember that guy? I'm old and I'd say barely) wrote an opposing op ed saying that even though he supports the change that this is contrary to the governing statute that he helped write, which explicitly bars the FCC from changing this limit

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/08/can-trump-fcc-re...

jimkleiber•4m ago
I wish more people would play the game Monopoly and realize how much it can suck to live in a world full of monopolies.
I heard in some European countries they packed digital SD channels into less spectrum (one 6 MHz channel can carry 4-5 TV channels). We should have done that here instead of broadcasting HD.
UncleOxidant•18m ago
Here in the US I get PBS on Channel 10 - there's 10.1 (straight PBS), 10.2 (PBS-World) and 10.3 (PBS kids) - do each of these take a separate 6MHz bandwidth, or are they packed into that single 6MHz bandwidth like in Europe?
wmf•10m ago
Yeah, that's one channel. IMO it's wasteful to give PBS an entire 6 MHz.
Animats•8m ago
ESPN, however, demands that they get the full 6 MHz.
jyoung8607•10m ago
That's already widely done in the US.

If you plug in an antenna and scan for local channels, what used to be one analog TV channel on colloquially-named "channel 7" in the defined channel 7 frequency range will now be seen as "channel 7-1" which is often (but not always!) actually broadcast on the old frequency. During the ATSC transition, it was important to retain the branding and consumer memory of "channel 7" even when the RF transport frequency changed.

The transition opened the ability to have an arbitrary number of digital subchannels, 7-2, 7-3, etc etc. The total bitrate available on a given ATSC broadcast is fixed, but it can be partitioned among multiple MPEG streams. The typical setup is one (occasional two) HD channels and several SD channels. Obviously there's a balancing act between bitrate and visual quality for each subchannel. It's often used as a way to broadcast older (read: cheaper) syndicated SD content on which they can run more ads while keeping the main HD channel quality reasonably acceptable.

wmf•7m ago
That's not what I'm talking about though. We should have repacked ABC, NBC, CBS, and Fox onto a single channel.
CamperBob2•25m ago
Broadcast TV seems laughably irrelevant.

The people who watch it vote in numbers far out of proportion to their peers. Nobody would bother to capture the industry if it weren't worthwhile.

francisofascii•25m ago
Irrelevant? I was under the impression cord cutting is pretty common. If you want to watch live sports or the news, you need CBS, NBC, ABC, FOX. We use a MoHu antenna in the attic.
UncleOxidant•21m ago
> this spectrum should simply be reassigned for IP based services, with perhaps some set aside for non profit / educational uses, some for commercial, etc.

We've got internet, but no cable. So we still watch over-the-air TV, though it's mostly PBS at this point (which is non profit). Also listen to FM radio - mostly NPR, a jazz station and a classical station - all also non-profit.

ericmay•17m ago
We have everything and still use antennas for local broadcast: NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, Fox. Sports, especially football, are very easy to access over the air.
walrus01•14m ago
> Broadcast TV seems laughably irrelevant. It’s difficult to find official numbers, but under 1% of US households have no cable,

It's not that people are literally watching these on over the air digital TV antenna systems, but that if you have a "Broadcast TV" station in a certain market, it becomes carried by default on cable systems, direct to home satellite satellite dish systems, and regional FTTH providers' last-mile cable-tv-equivalent products.

Look at for example how all the Seattle TV stations are carried on Comcast or Astound's networks.

Animats•7m ago
Amusingly, there are streaming sites you can't watch without permission from your "television provider".
erickhill•46s ago
Except for live sports, for which it is still vastly superior - no subscription required.