* https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/31/spacex-wont-remove-all-of-...
and illegally, not sure how he's allowed to get away with it
and each starlink deorbit is putting toxic pollution into the atmosphere without penalty (launches too)
* https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2025-space-orbit-satellit...
A strange turn of phrase. What is the crime in view that's supposed to be punished?
WTF? Anyone willing to read this far knows that this is flat out false. The negative coverage was unrelenting, and largely driven by big players peeved by the unconventional process. Anyone who bothers to continue past that point is probably just looking for validation.
I think this bubble's failure mode matches that of a Ponzi scheme.
The stock price is of course ridiculous: Intel lagged behind TSMC, but apparently Terafab has orders for ASML's latest gen machines (2nm). If Intel will manage to get a yield, we'll see.
All this space and AI stuff is marketing. The IPO was to get free money for a serious TSMC competitor.
AlexMuir•46m ago
I'm a skeptic on SpaceX but the IPO price was $135, low was $108 and current price is $130. I wouldn't say that's far below.
caconym_•36m ago
Not that there's anything particularly unusual about this. High profile tech companies almost universally (actually I am not aware of any moderately recent exceptions at all) fall below the actual public opening price in the days or weeks following the IPO. I honestly don't know why anybody buys them.
encoderer•18m ago
Dig1t•14m ago