i’m not trying to dismiss this article entirely as i did get value around from discussion around verifying
but this coming from a VC firm invested in token producing companies and quoting the “genius” behind openclaw makes me think this is just an psyop of over engineering to get ppl to blindly spend tokens on the LLM slot machine
datadrivenangel•31m ago
Put another token in the slop machine!
jdcaballerov•16m ago
Not really; looping is a requirement when there's an imperfect generator: LLMs. I read the article some days ago and included the citation in my own.
ausbah•33m ago
but this coming from a VC firm invested in token producing companies and quoting the “genius” behind openclaw makes me think this is just an psyop of over engineering to get ppl to blindly spend tokens on the LLM slot machine
datadrivenangel•31m ago
jdcaballerov•16m ago
For a longer explanation why, here's mine:
https://memseek.ai/blog/the-loop-has-always-been-there/
ps: not affiliated with a16 or similar