Where is the updated gemini pro model?

ultracode... 3 months later?

Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go!!!!!

absolutely crazy to make this a "paid tier user" feature.

the primary difference between the free and the paid versions should be the amount of inference quota you have access to

is google fixed usage quota in antigravity? or still is this a problem of antigravity?

> Plan availability: The /boost command is available on paid plans across Google Antigravity 2.0 and the Antigravity CLI.

They are ignoring antigravity IDE like it does not exist anymore.

https://antigravity.google/product/antigravity-ide

Judging by this entire page being the direct output of an LLM with little editing done at all I assume the feature is probably half baked and probably just a bunch of skills or harness tweaks? In that case, why would anyone pay for this at all?

I gave up on Antigravity when Google changed its rules around paid plans AI quotas, leading to my AI Pro getting depleted in up to four rounds.

Have they ever gotten around to fixing it or is Antigravity only feasible with their Ultra plan?

Excellent, so Gemini 3.7 can trash your codebase even faster (but seriously: don't trust this model)

What's with all this AI spam for AI companies?! Seriously!?

Every single hour on HN it's OpenAI does this, Gemini does that.

It's all nothing.

Extra reasoning. Big whoop.

It's impressive how badly Google has screwed up their models and coding products. There was a brief period of time I was using Anti-gravity as my daily driver when they first introduced it and then they just completely screwed it up.

Astroturfed post.

I canceled my Ultra subscription after realizing I had Sol constantly fixing anything I tried to do with Antigravity. The most frustrating experience and a waste of money. I’m sorry for Google and hope they manage to fix their disaster.

On the one hand this kind of harness work is pretty interesting, on the other the blog post is light on details and sounds like existing behavior of any high end model in Claude Code, Pi, or one of the litany of other projects that people seem to be cooking up on a daily basis.