frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

A Note from LWN

https://lwn.net/Articles/1090585/
183•rwky•1h ago•29 comments

Three sites made 215,128 "best software" pages for AI. Perplexity cites them

https://trellner.com/reports/manufactured-sources-behind-ai-recommendations/
17•jakobgreenfeld•17m ago•1 comments

Just Bury Your Trash

https://www.worksinprogress.news/p/just-bury-your-trash
51•eamag•55m ago•26 comments

Mistral now trains on user input by default, except on enterprise tier

https://help.mistral.ai/en/articles/455207-can-i-opt-out-of-my-input-or-output-data-being-used-fo...
45•teekert•1h ago•22 comments

GrapheneOS says Pixel 11 has MTE support after all

https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117194007157499435
14•user_7832•17m ago•4 comments

Commodore 64 released September 1, 1982

https://dfarq.homeip.net/commodore-64-released-september-1-1982/
200•giuliomagnifico•5h ago•99 comments

A Small Telescope That Surprised Me

https://adfr.io/thoughts/20260831_a_small_telescope_that_surprised_me/
56•speckx•23h ago•39 comments

Aging Brains Blend Memories Together Instead of Just Forgetting Them

https://studyfinds.com/aging-brains-blend-memories-together-instead-of-forgetting-them-study-finds/
22•mdp2021•1h ago•8 comments

Poisson Disk Sampling

https://stripeacross.com/posts/poisson-disk-sampling/
9•vismit2000•29m ago•0 comments

Six curl CVEs after OpenAI and Anthropic came back with zero

https://aisle.com/blog/aisle-discovered-six-curl-cves-after-openai-and-anthropic-found-zero
15•goobreee•34m ago•0 comments

Check if a file was made with Claude

https://claude.com/check-content
20•frexs•1h ago•7 comments

The Lost Art of Carrying Loads

https://www.carryology.com/insights/the-lost-art-of-carrying-loads/
31•surprisetalk•2d ago•37 comments

Ending my elixir exploratory writing

https://lucassifoni.info/blog/the-end-of-this-elixir-log/
32•ffin•2h ago•13 comments

Dutch central bank moves share of gold from U.S., Canada to London

https://nltimes.nl/2026/09/02/dutch-central-bank-moves-share-gold-us-canada-london-cites-instability
58•TechTechTech•1h ago•38 comments

The Emergent Symbolic Structure of Artificial Neural Networks

https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29530
221•schmuhblaster•10h ago•74 comments

Biggest dark matter detector spots a single weird particle

https://www.science.org/content/article/world-s-biggest-dark-matter-detector-spots-single-weird-p...
6•randycupertino•37m ago•0 comments

Telli (YC F24) is hiring engineers and designers [Berlin, on-site]

https://careers.telli.com/
1•sebselassie•5h ago

Move in C++ without a std:move

https://andreasfertig.com/blog/2026/09/move-in-cpp-without-a-stdmove/
26•dalvrosa•1d ago•22 comments

Quasar 438B: Europe's Leading AI Model

https://multiversecomputing.com/resources/introducing-quasar-438b-europe-s-leading-ai-model
86•amunozo•4h ago•68 comments

LLMs: Intelligence vs. Cost

https://openteams.com/intelligence-vs-cost/
8•theanonymousone•1h ago•2 comments

You Know Who Hates AI? Insurance Claims Adjusters

https://www.wired.com/story/insurance-claims-adjusters-really-hate-ai/
105•joozio•2d ago•65 comments

Using jq to format JSON on the clipboard

https://chris48s.github.io/blogmarks/posts/2021/jsontidy/
13•stefanvdw1•1h ago•2 comments

Dyson CameraJet: The only toothbrush with a camera and a jet

https://www.dyson.com/discover/news/latest/introducing-camerajet
5•mgh2•29m ago•4 comments

Why humanoid robots won't catch up to human workers any time soon

https://www.understandingai.org/p/why-humanoid-robots-wont-catch-up
9•speckx•1h ago•3 comments

How accurate have Ed Zitron's AI skeptic predictions been?

https://danluu.com/zitron/
801•jatins•19h ago•899 comments

A Beginner's Deep Dive Guide to Entra Passkeys

https://emsroute.com/2026/03/19/passkeys-beginners-101/
8•speckx•1h ago•8 comments

Banca Etica Suspends A/I's Account While Condemning the Sanctions Behind It

https://sabot.media/post/banca-etica-statement-english
27•rendx•4h ago•16 comments

Crossing Boundaries with Integration Events

https://deniskyashif.com/2026/08/29/crossing-boundaries-with-integration-events/
5•alembic_fumes•3d ago•0 comments

The Cables That Connect the World

https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/the-cables-that-connect-the-world/
8•surprisetalk•1h ago•1 comments

It's OK to hardcode feature flags (2025)

https://code.mendhak.com/hardcode-feature-flags/
44•biscuits1•3h ago•25 comments
Open in hackernews

A Note from LWN

https://lwn.net/Articles/1090585/
169•rwky•1h ago

Comments

AlexB138•50m ago
LWN is one of the, if not the single, highest signal tech publications around. I hope they're able to maintain a stable subscription service. Being user funded, and avoiding having to maintain allegiance to advertisers, is likely part of why their quality is so high.
giancarlostoro•40m ago
Not only that but lwn is one of the main sites that gets submitted to HN all year round (not daily, but maybe nearish to daily). So the audience here on HN has been exposed to it over the years. I'm not sure what more they could do to get new subscribers, I certainly hope they figure that out or how to get new ways to earn revenue without having to go the ad route.

https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=lwn.net

rdpintqogeogsaa•38m ago
That's the thing though. You can get all the value from LWN through here. Even if it wasn't for them tolerating subscriber links being posted on HN, the week-long delay isn't nearly enough an incentive to actually subscribe, rationally speaking.
roryirvine•34m ago
I think the generosity and straightforwardness are a big part of the attraction for many subscribers.

They've always respected their readers and I hope that continues to pay off.

giancarlostoro•32m ago
Easy to say until they have to eventually make the hard decision to shut down.
tonyarkles•25m ago
Rationally-speaking, maybe not. I’ve been a long-time subscriber. When I first subscribed, my day-to-day involved embedded Linux and getting the “breaking news” was pretty valuable. These days I still do that somewhat but I’m stuck on a crusty vendor kernel and anything I read about a kernel newer than 5.15 is going to land on my desk in approximately 2028… but I still subscribe, mostly with a patronage mindset: I don’t acutely get value from the subscription every week, but I think it’s a community service and I’m happy to pitch in a few bucks to keep it alive.
birdieop•21m ago
They could also consider paying their employees less.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38106227

bayindirh•8m ago
I'd argue otherwise.

Crab-bucket mentality aside, what they do is extremely important and hard to do. They do something very important.

OTOH, thanks for nudging me towards subscribing to LWN a bit more.

Edit: Just subscribed. Thank you.

k12sosse•7m ago
If I can't have something, you shouldn't either, why didn't I think of that! Chud
microtonal•49m ago
Thanks LWN team for the honest and straightforward post! The prices you ask are well worth it for the incredible value that LWN provides.

I forgot to renew my subscription a while back and it has been a bit busy, will renew now.

roryirvine•45m ago
Seems like only yesterday when they last increased their prices but it was, in fact, back in January 2022 - time flies!

I'll have been an LWN subscriber for 22 years as of next week, and am very happy to continue to be one. It's easily the most worthwhile subscription I currently have.

thataccount•44m ago
LWN, probably about to discover people are paying high prices for all manner of things and will find that LWN is, sadly, a disposable entity to pay for.
dcow•43m ago
Based on the initial response, it does not, in fact, seem like this is the conclusion.
giancarlostoro•39m ago
They could always bump down a tier if needed, they have 6 months to decide anyway.
mrweasel•36m ago
You could also see if it's something your employer allows to to expense. It's still cheap enough that it's something most managers can just approve directly, depending on organizational structures.
bryanlarsen•34m ago
I suspect everybody likely to do so has already done so. Anybody who thinks $6 a month is a lot of money will also think $5 a month is a lot of money for something that they can get for free by waiting a week.
thataccount•26m ago
5 to 6 dollars is not much in terms of a donation. In terms of a subscription, though...One thing is voluntary if you find value, the other is mandatory to get to the value unless you are willing to wait.
Diederich•36m ago
LWN is one of the cornerstones of my very successful career.

Starting from the beginning, I have (at least) read through every story and every article, every week, since 1998. Especially in the beginning, there was a lot in each article I didn't understand. I would try to do some digging into those topics.

One way or another, just the weekly exposure to absolutely top notch technical writing was foundational to me.

When newer folk would ask me how to really get good with Linux, I would always point them to LWN.net.

I've been a subscriber since the beginning. That small investment is the least I can do given the incalculable value LWN has brought to me.

simonebrunozzi•20m ago
Sorry to be that guy, but... Please consider donating a significant amount to them, given that they have been a cornerstone of your very successful career.

I did something similar in the past, in relation to Ubuntu, and I never regretted it, even if that money would have been very useful if spent in other ways.

Diederich•12m ago
I will be doing just that today.
farlight•31m ago
I know the editors visit these discussions: please, next time use a more descriptive title! I nearly had a fit when I saw that, really thought LWN is going down like it almost did 20 years ago.

Happy to pay the new price, even though I can only afford the cheapest tier.

0xbadc0de5•22m ago
tl;dr - LWN is raising their prices 20%.

I have no opinion since I'm not a subscriber, just adding for clarity since the title is ambiguous.

bryanlarsen•16m ago
I think you're reinforcing my point. Both $5 and $6 a month are a lot of money to many people. LWN isn't "about to discover" this, they've likely already discovered this in their release + 1 week traffic over the years since they set the price at $5/month.