frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

A Note from LWN

https://lwn.net/Articles/1090585/
217•rwky•1h ago•37 comments

Three sites made 215,128 "best software" pages for AI. Perplexity cites them

https://trellner.com/reports/manufactured-sources-behind-ai-recommendations/
27•jakobgreenfeld•27m ago•11 comments

GrapheneOS says Pixel 11 has MTE support after all

https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117194007157499435
19•user_7832•27m ago•6 comments

Mistral now trains on user input by default, except on enterprise tier

https://help.mistral.ai/en/articles/455207-can-i-opt-out-of-my-input-or-output-data-being-used-fo...
60•teekert•1h ago•26 comments

Poisson Disk Sampling

https://stripeacross.com/posts/poisson-disk-sampling/
15•vismit2000•40m ago•0 comments

Commodore 64 released September 1, 1982

https://dfarq.homeip.net/commodore-64-released-september-1-1982/
203•giuliomagnifico•5h ago•100 comments

Biggest dark matter detector spots a single weird particle

https://www.science.org/content/article/world-s-biggest-dark-matter-detector-spots-single-weird-p...
11•randycupertino•47m ago•0 comments

Aging Brains Blend Memories Together Instead of Just Forgetting Them

https://studyfinds.com/aging-brains-blend-memories-together-instead-of-forgetting-them-study-finds/
29•mdp2021•1h ago•9 comments

Six curl CVEs after OpenAI and Anthropic came back with zero

https://aisle.com/blog/aisle-discovered-six-curl-cves-after-openai-and-anthropic-found-zero
23•goobreee•44m ago•4 comments

Just bury your trash: What if everything we know about recycling is wrong?

https://worksinprogress.co/issue/just-bury-your-trash/
5•magoghm•16m ago•1 comments

A Small Telescope That Surprised Me

https://adfr.io/thoughts/20260831_a_small_telescope_that_surprised_me/
59•speckx•23h ago•43 comments

Dutch central bank moves share of gold from U.S., Canada to London

https://nltimes.nl/2026/09/02/dutch-central-bank-moves-share-gold-us-canada-london-cites-instability
66•TechTechTech•1h ago•45 comments

Just Bury Your Trash

https://www.worksinprogress.news/p/just-bury-your-trash
69•eamag•1h ago•50 comments

Ending my elixir exploratory writing

https://lucassifoni.info/blog/the-end-of-this-elixir-log/
32•ffin•2h ago•14 comments

The Emergent Symbolic Structure of Artificial Neural Networks

https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29530
221•schmuhblaster•10h ago•74 comments

Exit the Cave

https://turtlespace.blog/p/exit-the-cave
3•akkartik•11m ago•0 comments

Telli (YC F24) is hiring engineers and designers [Berlin, on-site]

https://careers.telli.com/
1•sebselassie•5h ago

Using jq to format JSON on the clipboard

https://chris48s.github.io/blogmarks/posts/2021/jsontidy/
16•stefanvdw1•1h ago•4 comments

Dyson CameraJet: The only toothbrush with a camera and a jet

https://www.dyson.com/discover/news/latest/introducing-camerajet
8•mgh2•39m ago•8 comments

Quasar 438B: Europe's Leading AI Model

https://multiversecomputing.com/resources/introducing-quasar-438b-europe-s-leading-ai-model
89•amunozo•4h ago•70 comments

LLMs: Intelligence vs. Cost

https://openteams.com/intelligence-vs-cost/
9•theanonymousone•1h ago•3 comments

Check if a file was made with Claude

https://claude.com/check-content
24•frexs•2h ago•14 comments

Move in C++ without a std:move

https://andreasfertig.com/blog/2026/09/move-in-cpp-without-a-stdmove/
26•dalvrosa•1d ago•22 comments

A Beginner's Deep Dive Guide to Entra Passkeys

https://emsroute.com/2026/03/19/passkeys-beginners-101/
9•speckx•1h ago•8 comments

You Know Who Hates AI? Insurance Claims Adjusters

https://www.wired.com/story/insurance-claims-adjusters-really-hate-ai/
107•joozio•2d ago•73 comments

WebLLM: high-performance in-browser LLM inference engine

https://github.com/mlc-ai/web-llm
3•saikatsg•25m ago•0 comments

The Lost Art of Carrying Loads

https://www.carryology.com/insights/the-lost-art-of-carrying-loads/
33•surprisetalk•2d ago•39 comments

How accurate have Ed Zitron's AI skeptic predictions been?

https://danluu.com/zitron/
804•jatins•19h ago•905 comments

Why humanoid robots won't catch up to human workers any time soon

https://www.understandingai.org/p/why-humanoid-robots-wont-catch-up
10•speckx•1h ago•5 comments

Banca Etica Suspends A/I's Account While Condemning the Sanctions Behind It

https://sabot.media/post/banca-etica-statement-english
27•rendx•4h ago•17 comments
Open in hackernews

Just Bury Your Trash

https://www.worksinprogress.news/p/just-bury-your-trash
63•eamag•1h ago

Comments

tfourb•35m ago
Meanwhile, New York exports its trash to the mid west and microplastics are found on the top of Mount Everest.
georgeecollins•34m ago
This all makes tons of sense. Recycling metal works, other recycling may not. Cloth bags make sense if you have a few of them and use them hundreds of times. Reduce still makes sense so why not focus on reduce.
toomuchtodo•32m ago
"I am once again asking you to consider plasma gasification."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_gasification

InEnTec says its plasma technology effectively destroys PFAS - https://www.wastetodaymagazine.com/news/inentec-says-its-pla... - August 23rd, 2024

Production of high quality syngas from argon plasma gasification of plastic - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41623879 (September 2024) (0 comments)

Plasma gasification versus incineration of plastic waste: Energy, economic and environmental analysis - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107470

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38994374

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38722984

murderfs•14m ago
What's the point of this when incineration is an option? Even its wikipedia page has only negatives compared to incineration.

> Air emissions can be cleaner than landfills and similar to that of incinerators.

> Large initial investment costs relative to that of alternatives, including [...] incineration.

> Operational costs are high relative to that of incineration.

ImHereToVote•30m ago
If a country burns coal. It should burn trash first, before the coal.
Flavius•24m ago
Absolutely, but green activists are actively fighting against burning trash. This needs to stop. Even if a country doesn't burn coal it should still burn trash instead of sending it to poor countries. People need to take responsibility for the trash that they generate.
butlike•17m ago
Yeah, burning trash isn't a great answer
axus•30m ago
Hopefully energy used will become less important. CO2 emissions seem like the biggest threat to our long term health. Microplastics also matter, a bit.

How much plastic is escaping into the environment from the recycling process vs. landfill? What are the CO2 output of landfill vs. recycling? I imagine burning would be the worst option for these.

Not surprised that the market forces tended towards the most energy efficient waste disposal systems; glad we don't have mountains of trash or poor landfills.

duggan•30m ago
I don't remember energy use being the problem with plastic bags?

It was plastic bags being absolutely everywhere in the environment. Streets, parks, trees. Wrapped around anything sticking out of the ground. On your face on a windy day.

Pollution is the problem with plastic. Probably health, too, now that microplastics are being recognized as an issue.

crab_galaxy•26m ago
Every winter in my city, once the leaves all fell, our trees would be draped in shredded plastic bags. Banning single use plastic bags has done a significant amount to beautify this place.
justonceokay•22m ago
When visiting Seattle for the first time my mom was simultaneously outraged at the lack of plastic bags and the recycling bins everywhere, and also in awe at how clean the city was. Never did the two thoughts cross each other in her head
RankingMember•19m ago
They were also so damn cheap that clerks would bag EVERYTHING without asking, so they not only covered the streets like you describe, but often after offering no actual utility to begin with.
Symmetry•10m ago
But the pollution problem from plastic bags is solved equally well if we bury them or recycle them. Provided your municipality doesn't just dump trash in the nearest river which is an issue in some parts of the world.

Since we can't get 100% compliance in rich countries and poor countries can't afford landfills that's a good reason to not use plastic. But it's not a good reason to have plastic recycling programs.

hank2000•28m ago
I don’t understand how plastic bags for “100 years at current rates” is an argument FOR its longevity/being fine?
bensyverson•18m ago
Yes… I don't think the author is thinking on a long enough time horizon.

I'm curious what happens to these landfill sites in 100, 1000 and 10k years. Do they inevitably break down and leak into the water table? Do they eventually stop off-gassing and become inert? Do they become fossilized layers of sediment on a long enough horizon? If we maintain our current waste levels, how much land is required by the year 3000?

xd1936•27m ago
The argument that is pro-polyethylene plastic bags over cotton completely ignores the source: Renewable plants that are grown and harvested, vs. finite fossil fuels extracted from the Earth and refined.

> Instead of a simple blowing and sealing process, the cotton must be made into yarn, woven into fabric, prepared, dried, sized, dyed, and finished, which takes around 1,725 megajoules, around 3,050 times as much energy.

That conveniently ignores the drilling, extracting, transporting, refining, and transporting again to make "polyethylene resin".

frotaur•24m ago
The energy to make the cotton bags presumably also involves lots of drilling and extracting, at least currently.
_aavaa_•14m ago
> That conveniently ignores the drilling, extracting, transporting, refining, and transporting again to make "polyethylene resin".

It also ignores the energy requirements to grow the cotton. This isn't the gotcha you think it is.

conorbergin•26m ago
I think using a cotton bag 173 times to beat plastic bags and a mug 1,000 times to beat disposable cups sounds completely reasonable.
dinkblam•24m ago
thats assuming the plastic bag is used once, but i've always reused them, sometimes had the same bags for 10 years

however i have never re-used a paper bag because they are awfully loud and cannot be compressed. it is the worst kind of bag.

add-sub-mul-div•20m ago
I reused all my grocery store plastic bags for disposing of cat litter and other trash. When those bags went away I had to start buying new plastic bags for the first time.
ch4s3•11m ago
Turning a plastic grocery bag into a small bathroom trashcan liner is IMO the perfect reuse. it displaces a thicker plastic bag and ensures the grocery bag goes into a landfill.
smcg•21m ago
Not every place has space for landfills... which is why we often ship trash over to low-income countries.
dghlsakjg•12m ago
There’s precious few places on earth that don’t have room for landfills, and those places will be shipping their refuse whether it is sent as “recycling” or as trash. The article also points out that incineration is an option to reduce volume, but expensive.

There are cases of shipping trash around, but it has more to do with it being cheaper to send a container of garbage somewhere than dispose of it locally.

Cost is the constraint, not available space.

Symmetry•5m ago
There's a very nice park near where I live that used to be a landfill. Space isn't really a concern.

https://maps.app.goo.gl/vCeyDb9tbm29zr549

It's much more the case that we ship plastic to be recycled to other countries than trash. The problem is that then the unrecyclable plastic mixed in often ends up in rivers.

lillecarl•15m ago
Just burn your trash

https://www.energimyndigheten.se/en/news/2025/from-waste-to-...

My understanding is that biological decomposition of waste creates methane which is a worse greenhouse gas than CO2.

elil17•9m ago
That's only if it's buried. Properly managed compost is the best option.
sigilis•7m ago
Burning waste is listed in the article as an even better for the environment, but somewhat more expensive method.

The methane that landfills produce is routinely captured and burned for power, they may otherwise flare it off before it can contribute to the greenhouse effect. This is also mentioned in the article.

AlexandrB•5m ago
The thing with methane is that it has a lifespan of something like 10 years in the atmosphere before it breaks down to CO2, while CO2 persists for centuries. I suspect that burning would release more net CO2 than emitting the methane and having it eventually break down to CO2.

[1] https://science.nasa.gov/earth/explore/earth-indicators/meth...

> A molecule of methane traps more heat than a molecule of CO2, but methane has a relatively short lifespan of 7 to 12 years in the atmosphere. CO2 can persist for hundreds of years or more.

rapnie•12m ago
In the Netherlands the cradle to cradle hype of some years ago has created a paper reality where waste is turned magically into building material and can thus be effectively dumped anywhere in the environment.
jschveibinz•8m ago
Other papers/articles on this topic:

Tierney:

"The Reign of..." https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/04/opinion/sunday/the-reign-...

Kinnaman:

"Is it Time to..." https://www.vox.com/2016/2/13/10972986/recycling

Kinnaman, Thomas C. "Determining the Socially Optimal Recycling Rate." Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 85, 2014, pp. 5–10, doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.11.002.

cogman10•8m ago
> A returnable milk bottle takes much more energy to produce and much more fuel to transport than a plastic carton, and has to make around ten or more trips to use less energy than a bottle made from polyethylene plastic.

This seems like the weakest of presented arguments. Just 10 trips and it's more environmentally friendly? Yeah, seems like reusable milk bottles wins over plastic. That's what, ~10 weeks for payback?

dguest•8m ago
These arguments tend to ignore that a reusable thing is often just a lot better at whatever it does. You can put a few liters of milk in a reusable bag without triple bagging it. You don't have to worry that it will split open and spill out on the ground. You can use the bag to pack for road trips, to store kid's snacks and toys, as a gym bag, etc. Groceries aren't the only thing anyone caries and people go further than between their boot and fridge.

In Switzerland grocery stores have been promoting reusable (recycled plastic) bags for years, and people use them for everything: I saw someone in Interlaken carrying firewood with one.

Symmetry•7m ago
The article mentions the energy benefits from recycling aluminium but fails to mention the also large (but not as large) savings from recycling glass. Please recycle your aluminium and glass even if it's probably wiser to throw out plastic in most localities.
joekrill•7m ago
Penn & Teller have a Bullshit! episode about this (Season 2, Episode 5). Well, it's technically about recycling, but it makes the claim that landfills are not a bad thing, and much better than the current recycling situation, in most cases.

That episode has always stuck with me, and I've always wondered how valid their argument is.

general_reveal•6m ago
In an apartment, I’ve learned not to even have a garbage bin. If I have garbage I make a small bag and throw it out, or keep it in the freezer until I go out. Frozen trash doesn’t smell and doesn’t attract anything :)

Of course, this requires you to have less trash , which is very easy if you simply take a few seconds to go outside and throw your food out after lunch/dinner. Everything else is just dry scraps usually. There’s always the fridge :)

All in all, there is no concept of “garbage”, “garbage bin” , or any kind of “garbage accumulation” in my apartments.

vel0city•8m ago
> But the pollution problem from plastic bags is solved equally well if we bury them or recycle them

We can't even reliably trust people to put the plastic bags in a bin and have that bin be cleanly collected and yet you're expecting people to bury them??

No, the solution is to massively reduce how often we use single-use plastic bags. It seems like every time I buy anything from any store its just assumed I want it in a plastic bag. Getting a single bottled drink at a convenience store? The clerk gets a plastic bag ready. Its insane.

lolcatzlulz•9m ago
I remember a debate in Texas politics a few years ago because livestock were dying from consumption of littered plastic bags.

The state government response was to ban the ban of plastic bags.