President Genocidal Rapist Pederast Rug Pull, the last President of the fake American empire of lies, the emperor with no clothes, exposing his vile and disgusting true self.
Is really rather epic, like a story one would imagine has been made up about a historical figure if we hadn’t witnessed it all unfold in real time.
How would you know and why would you have such a strong opinion?
Do you also happen to astroturf rightoid politics on Twitter by any chance? I heard it's a common pastime.
But anyone with a decent amount of dignity, humility, empathy and confidence will do.
spiderfarmer•48m ago
No whataboutisms or anonymous downvotes, I’m genuinely curious why people continue to support him.
16000198•41m ago
jameskilton•40m ago
arscan•11m ago
atwrk•40m ago
infinitezest•15m ago
grim_io•37m ago
I'd argue that actively trying to make enemies out of friends is in no way going to make America stronger. Quite the opposite.
infinitezest•13m ago
schnika•41m ago
rplnt•40m ago
Abekkus•40m ago
sajithdilshan•38m ago
jansport123•34m ago
gadders•31m ago
vincnetas•25m ago
andyjohnson0•29m ago
You seem to be using the "they're all as bad as eachother" argument. But previous US presidents haven't used their office for enrichment on this scale - and so it seems likely that there are alternative potential presidents who would behave with integrity and dignity.
sajithdilshan•8m ago
But isn't that the case? They are all as bad and corrupt in their own merit. Coming back to the original question, do you have anyone concrete in mind that can be the alternative to Trump?
peder•36m ago
dmm•35m ago
Not a Trump supporter but from the ones I've spoken to it's mostly this. Something like, "They all do it, he's just honest about it."
gadders•32m ago
I would say that despite whatever pardons (which I believe can only be federal, not state?), he pro-actively gives himself and colleagues, family etc when he leaves office he will be spending the rest of his life fighting spurious court case after court case, none of which will be cheap.
In that regard, having massive personal wealth makes some kind of sense.
However - they're all at it to some degree across both sides of the aisle - Pelosi, Crenshaw etc etc.
drcongo•21m ago
Couldn't even follow the ask in your first sentence.
optimisticedits•1m ago
It also came with a request for no-downvotes... What's next? A request for only responses that agree with me?
Here's my request: Upvotes only. Please don't respond.
hermannj314•28m ago
A God that murders people because his feelings got hurt while demanding no one murder, a husband beats his wife and kids because he wasn't respected - these are valid in their moral framework, cruel asymmetrical power structures.
There is a dominant race, a dominant gender, and a dominant country in their view. Laws exist only to control the weak.
These people love Trump because he represents the slave owning, male-dominated, terrorist rebels that form the myth of who we are as a nation. His corruption and enrichment is why they love him.
StevePrefontain•17m ago
spiderfarmer•10m ago
exceptione•26m ago
The most important point for every political faction however is to realize that the problems aren't solved when the current president steps down. The real power that pushes the agenda rest in the hands of a loosely connected network of 'think tanks', religious organizations, tech billionaires and media moguls. They are hidden from the public discourse, simply because they are able to manage it, and as such are a formidable opponent.
K0balt•18m ago
I do think that significant amounts of money are being spent to make people believe that the admin has wide support and is legitimate in a general democratic sense.
Ultimately, in a democracy, legitimacy really boils down to how much people are willing to tolerate, and that’s a very malleable metric, adjusted through fear, greed, hope, and all of the deceptions as well as legitimate plans that contribute to those motivations.
The people that I know that support him have simplistic worldviews, and largely see him as a wrecking ball destroying what they were previously dissatisfied with. I suppose that’s not too far off, actually. It’s kind of like “giant meteorite for 2028” vibes, except they mean it.
Notably, the only people who wish for a political devolution are ones who haven’t lived through one. This doesn’t end well.