I'm afraid that 100% compatibility may be very often at odds with multi-threaded elisp. So much in Emacs depends on global state :-/
> ~95%, closing the last gaps
If coding with LLMs taught me anything, it’s that this last 5% can be “load-bearing”.
But also suspicious of anything this AI generated which touts rust like this.
so I don't think one can achieve that by maintaining 100% compatibility. a much smaller base system build with better semantics that was notionally compatible would be something I would be really excited to contribute to.
Yes, quite the smoking gun of a load-bearing phrase.
I mean gnu-emacs is already quite snappy in Wayland mode.
maybe it targets net new users?
I don't see any notes in the README about alternative scripting engines, elisp was always the main that turned me off from emacs. Does anybody know if they plan to add something like Lua?
Not that the README is any better. It's just a long string of Claudisms. Fuck.
"Don't you ever get bored of pointing out that everything is AI slop?" Yes. I am very bored of pointing this out. I'll let you know when getting bored of it fixes the problem. I'm sorry if you think slop that will likely be unmaintained in a month and can be done even better by next month's model releases anyways is worth taking up a massive chunk of the HN frontpage forever, but I just don't agree.
tommica•29m ago
bigfishrunning•15m ago