Anecdotally, current models seem to be decent at general personal finance principles - certainly better than the majority of personal finance education that people get exposed to unless they seek it out and read a variety of books and sources. But I wouldn't trust them with direct decision making with actual money due to the training lag time on current tax policy, etc.
sixtyj•28m ago
I would prefer to use agent-assisted python scripts that chatbot.
k7peak•24m ago
Agreed, this works really well for me. Double check the math/python, execute many times without a LLM that can change o
demibabs•23m ago
I like how FT makes me accept cookies from their 46 “technology” (advertising) partners before showing me that the article is behind a paywall anyway.
jb1991•17m ago
You actually like that? I find it kind of annoying.
Wololooo•13m ago
No they do not like it, it is a figure of speech to underline how much they do not like it.
01100011•9m ago
Single shot or with reasoning enabled? My experience is that reasoning dramatically reduces hallucinations and improves output quality. I don't trust models without it.
ehe78qhe•37m ago
Anecdotally, current models seem to be decent at general personal finance principles - certainly better than the majority of personal finance education that people get exposed to unless they seek it out and read a variety of books and sources. But I wouldn't trust them with direct decision making with actual money due to the training lag time on current tax policy, etc.