frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

You Are No Longer Invited to Dinner

https://www.derekthompson.org/p/the-death-of-the-american-host
163•barry-cotter•1h ago•112 comments

AI companies leak data to advertisers [pdf]

https://jorgegarciaherrero.com/wp-content/interactivos/20260916-Prompt-like-a-butterfly-sting-lik...
189•damaru2•3h ago•51 comments

Jeeves. Reasoning improves Jev-like decision models

https://github.com/PostHog/jeeves
60•nicowaltz•1h ago•23 comments

Using any C++ library in Godot

https://blog.conan.io/cpp/conan/gamedev/godot/cmake/2026/09/29/Using-Any-Cpp-Library-In-Godot.html
72•czoido•4h ago•21 comments

500k facial scans at UK stations yield no arrests, 1 false positive

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/29/trial-live-facial-recognition-cameras-london-s...
96•ilamont•1h ago•46 comments

US sanctions force The Netherlands off Microsoft and toward alternative NixOS

https://www.tomshardware.com/software/the-netherlands-is-rolling-alternative-nixos-based-software...
70•mywacaday•1h ago•30 comments

Phyllotaxis: An audio-reactive LED display

https://jagi.studio/posts/phyllotaxis/
172•evakhoury•20h ago•22 comments

Booted up in 1993, this server still runs – but not for much longer (2017)

https://www.computerworld.com/article/1673071/booted-up-in-1993-this-server-still-runs-but-not-fo...
100•doener•1d ago•41 comments

The systems that no one will test

https://blog.christianperone.com/2026/09/the-systems-that-no-one-will-test/
95•perone•1d ago•36 comments

Show HN: Raven – The harness of harnesses, built for RSI

https://github.com/EverMind-AI/Raven
13•cyfyifanchen•2h ago•3 comments

Startup Nights 2026 is comming up on 5-6 Nov. in Switzerland

https://www.startup-nights.ch/event/
33•sschueller•4h ago•11 comments

California farmers are struggling to sell grapes as demand for wine drops

https://www.kqed.org/news/12101534/california-farmers-are-struggling-to-sell-grapes-as-demand-for...
270•randycupertino•16h ago•676 comments

Software occlusion culling in Block Game

https://enikofox.com/posts/software-rendered-occlusion-culling-in-block-game/
47•airhangerf15•1d ago•4 comments

Pirating the Pirates

https://mubi.com/en/notebook/posts/pirating-the-pirates
628•piotrgrabowski•20h ago•316 comments

Four CHI '26 papers I wish I wrote

https://countingfromzero.blog/2026/04/24/four-chi-26-papers-i-wish-i-wrote/
17•luu•2d ago•3 comments

Tank Body Problem

http://www.jimsitu.com
132•jimbooonooo•12h ago•30 comments

MicroLLM Lab – Try 7 tiny LLM's in the browser

https://stateofutopia.com/experiments/microllmlab/
259•logicallee•17h ago•90 comments

Optimizing x264 settings and per-title ladders

https://streaminglearningcenter.com/articles/optimizing-x264-settings-and-per-title-ladders.html
6•dabinat•2d ago•0 comments

12,000-year-old Göbeklitepe burials explain scattered bones

https://archaeologymag.com/2026/09/gobeklitepe-burials-hundreds-of-scattered-bones/
152•yusufaytas•3d ago•42 comments

ESP32S3 cluster running 1.58-bit (BitNet) Language model

https://github.com/Low-Zi-Hong/ESP32s3-LLM-Cluster
114•nkko•15h ago•24 comments

Jeff – Jev-compatible 0.8B decision models, trained at home, ~30 ms

https://github.com/firelex/jeff
524•firelex•16h ago•199 comments

New Cyber-OSINT model released

https://twitter.com/0x0SojalSec/status/2104736980768866439
27•soltanov•2h ago•6 comments

Updated Google Maps shows destruction of the city of Rafah

https://twitter.com/AliAbunimah/status/2103890594137309425
697•slowin•21h ago•569 comments

Nvidia wants to put a watchdog chip next to every AI agent

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/28/nvidia-releases.html
198•jonbaer•21h ago•249 comments

Evan Doorbell's Phone Tapes – Brought to You by Telephone World

https://evan-doorbell.com/
9•mikecarlton•4h ago•0 comments

Hijacking the PS5's RTMP stream

https://yashgarg.dev/posts/hijacking-ps5-rtmp-stream/
269•ibobev•21h ago•87 comments

Sonnet 5.5

https://www.anthropic.com/claude-sonnet-5-5
831•D2OQZG8l5BI1S06•18h ago•560 comments

Kids turned low-traffic NPR Spotify comments into a secret group chat

https://www.thisamericanlife.org/897/transcript
437•simonpure•21h ago•233 comments

Scientists solve 1840s space weather mystery

https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/09/scientists-solve-1840s-space-weather-mystery/
116•gumby•16h ago•48 comments

Does Reddit have an astroturfing problem? What the data suggests

https://www.petervijeh.com/projects/reddit-astroturf
255•p-s-v•23h ago•321 comments
Open in hackernews

500k facial scans at UK stations yield no arrests, 1 false positive

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/29/trial-live-facial-recognition-cameras-london-stations-false-positive
92•ilamont•1h ago

Comments

cyanydeez•58m ago
"Most everyone you meet is not a criminal"

Uncomfortable facts certain bigots dont want to understand.

PorciiVorbesc•53m ago
Yeah but from the PoV of the government everyone you meet could be a future criminal. They could have hateful thoughts towards the INGSOC party or towards Big Brother. They could even be allies of Emmanuel Goldstein. How else do you expect the government to keep you safe from such criminals, brother?
bostik•25m ago
To be fair, if you work in the UK government then everyone you meet on a daily basis is in high likelyhood a criminal.

If they're not laundering money, trafficking people or avoiding taxes, they're likely a visitor who has come to commit bribery. Oh sorry, "lobbying".

Sharlin•52m ago
"If most everyone you meet is not a criminal, the definition of 'criminal' is not yet sufficiently comprehensive."

Edit: added scare quotes because it's difficult to be sarcastic on the internet these days.

ChrisRR•50m ago
You think the definition of criminal is wrong unless the majority of people are defined as criminals?
Sharlin•48m ago
I guess I should've included a sarcasm warning. But that's certainly a view a certain type of powerful people seem to hold. Richelieu's famous (probably apocryphal) quote and all that.
motbus3•49m ago
Tech bros pushed us to believe that disagreeing and arguing instead of voting is the right way.

So we are now distracted while they reshape the world with hunger and death

philipallstar•41m ago
> Tech bros pushed us to believe that disagreeing and arguing instead of voting is the right way.

> So we are now distracted while they reshape the world with hunger and death

How constrained must one's thinking be to think like this? There are massive actual issues, and they're not your hated group of choice's fault.

infinitezest•26m ago
Ah, the famed "Nuh-Uh" defense. The fact is, Tech companies and the bros that head them have all of the money, all of the connections, and all of the information. Those of us not on that side of the equation do not. They may not be the initial cause of so many problems but they certainly have accelerated and deepened a great many of them in their race to extract (somehow) even more wealth from the societies that host them. We aren't nearly angry enough at them IMO.
vovavili•26m ago
Why are you on a YCombinator subdomain if this represents your beliefs?
Retr0id•57m ago
So now that the "trial" has failed we're going to stop doing face scanning, right? ...right???
pasc1878•46m ago
In the UK it has worked at other places

"He said 103 arrests has been made so far and there was one false alert which did not result in an arrest.

Supt Luke Dillon said overall crime figures in the Fairfield ward, where the pilot has been held, fell by 12% per cent.

"We're seeing reductions in almost all crime types, certainly in shoplifting and robbery," he said. "

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2056r07rjlo

jagged-chisel•18m ago
I’m more interested in whether these arrests were appropriate, the suspects convicted of a crime by a jury of their peers.
naich•46m ago
If it's not working it's because there isn't enough of it, silly.

"Last month BTP announced it was extending the trial for a further four months and expanding the deployments to include London Underground stations. "

c16•40m ago
No, because think of the children. /s
andrewstuart•50m ago
100% success!
Flavius•42m ago
Good news: rolling these facial scans everywhere in the country should lead to dozens of false positives.
windexh8er•27m ago
Where's our buddy Garrett Langley or even YC's Garry Tan to come to the defense of the privatized surveillance state?

Pretty much all I ever read about these systems is heinous false positives. I've currently set up automation to pull the local data that includes police activity. One of the towns over from me has, at least, 6 Flock cameras (probably more) for a locale of less than 2000 people. I've not once seen anything related to ALPR or any camera system providing any influence on assisting a crime. You'd think Mr. Langley would be begging police chiefs around the US to put in a positive spin to public information around these digital watchers.

But the morons buying these systems are also the morons taking state tax dollars to buy SWAT vehicles for 100s of thousands of dollars because they want to cosplay GI Joe. Yet... You want a park? Or something that's actually useful in your local community? Fund raise it yourself is the response.

ungreased0675•37m ago
I’m very against this type of pervasive surveillance, but that number seems implausible. The police may have only loaded a small group of suspects into the system, only targeted specific individuals, or some other reason we’re not aware of. The police protecting some criminals wouldn’t be a departure from standard practice in the UK.
p-e-w•31m ago
That was my first thought. They scanned roughly 1% of the UK’s population. No way they didn’t identify any wanted criminals unless the set of wanted criminals scanned for was only a tiny fraction of the overall list.
righthand•34m ago
Security theater is out of control. I just returned from traveling abroad to some major cities in Europe and getting back to NYC, it's the only city I've been in that let's the cops run wild and fly helicopters low over the city. Not so the cops can do any actual work but so they can take a 2 minute short cut to their private helicopter base instead of flying over the water. No person I have ever met enjoys the sudden loud noise from helicopters flying just above their head in the middle of the day/night. There are campaigns against it[0], and people despise cops. It would be such an easy win to gain some better relations with the communities and yet the cops keep on doing it.

The cops keeps doing it and the rich join in on holidays to take a shortcut to JFK from downtown Manhattan. The city were 9/11 was apparently a big deal wants to you feel like you're in a war zone all the time for shortcuts and a few $ savings on helicopter fuel.

This to me is the ultimate security theater environment, where the state is constantly pressing a false sense of FUD.

[0] https://stopthechopnynj.org/

muglug•14m ago
You’re conflating private helicopter rides (which are annoying and frequent) with police ones, which are generally pretty necessary. I’ve only seen them out in my neighborhood after serious crimes where a suspect hasn’t been caught.
righthand•9m ago
No I'm not conflating them, I see the NYPD tags on the map flying directly over Brooklyn to their helicopter base 5+ times a day. [0]

No they are not necessary, the East River is right there to fly over. I also have never read "cops failed to catch criminal due to long helicopter route back to base over East River" as a headline or a logical train of thought.

I'm guessing you're related to, or are a police officer yourself. Which means you're conflating truth with misdirection.

[0] https://globe.adsbexchange.com/

blitzar•33m ago
16 deployments for 6 months at rail stations - they must have been off 99% of the time to only scan 500k faces.

For scale 500k people is 2 days of Liverpool Street Stations daily average

iamacyborg•24m ago
How many unique faces though
mrweasel•22m ago
A lot of those are going to be the same people day in and day out, the article says 500k faces, not people. You also have to filter out those people where the cameras aren't getting an image good enough to scan.

The article doesn't say, and I haven't seen the cameras, but it's not like you're getting every single person parsing through those stations.

But, yes, the numbers seems low.

benbristow•30m ago
I've had an idea in the back of my head but I'm no businessman so have this one for free.

Build an AI model, train it from the catalogues of JD Sports and Sports Direct (and other brands like Stone Island etc.) and how to detect balaclavas, illegal electric bikes and e-scooters. Have it link to cameras and do a percentage chance using machine learning on chance of crime. Also increase the percentage if a 'wheely' is done (riding only on back wheel).

Would minority report the majority of crime in this country in one foul swoop.

Could call it ScroteScanner.

Some would call it discrimination but the majority of ASB I see around my area are people dressed/using those exact things.

If they start to catch-on (unlikely) then worse case we have a fancier looking society with gangsters in suits again.

blitzar•26m ago
Its like Shazam for Scrotes
benbristow•25m ago
Indeed.
iamacyborg•25m ago
Set up some automated scanners for cyclists jumping red lights in the City as well.
benbristow•21m ago
Hm, would depend if they're on rented or own bikes.

Rented you're charged by the minute so there's a financial incentive even for non-scrotes.

graemep
lifestyleguru•21m ago
> violence against women and girls, whose travel behaviours are shaped by experiences of sexual harassment and sexual offences”.

So much effort to protect little girls. Yet if you get stabbed, say clearly that you've been stabbed, they will not believe you. Then they will arrest your dead body.

toyg•17m ago
It was one case, hardly systemic yet. Shit happens, mistakes are made.
jwally•18m ago
I was thinking about this with flock cameras the other day...what's our actual ROI? Was the world horrible before and these initiatives are going to close a monster crime gap or is this just a giant fishing expedition ... just because?
lumost•10m ago
It would be interesting to see how these are justified internally. If I had to guess, it’s either excess budget being channeled into “something” or a justification to reduce street patrols/street crime.
whatever1•4m ago
Man we technologists are so bad at dealing with societal issues.

We try to reinvent something that claims that keeps tabs on everyone and for sure will punish you if you don’t behave well but will reward you if do!

The thing has a name. It’s the religion.

•
9m ago
If you jump a red light you are a scrote.
iamacyborg•3m ago
We also need a points-based system on the tube, if you’re walking slowly in tunnels blocking traffic at rush hour because you’re staring at your phone you get a point. 5 points and you get a 6 month ban from the tube.
Waterluvian•19m ago
They should just round up and imprison all the people who walk in my neighbourhood.

Some would call it discrimination but the majority of people who commit crimes in my area are people who can walk. I rarely see the wheelchair crowd pulling off B&Es.

Oh, or people who wear clothes. Criminals seem to like wearing clothes. Point proven: you never see nudists shoplifting Old Navy.

bellowsgulch•17m ago
People who make comments like this don’t have to deal with walking stereotypes committing crimes in broad daylight and it’s so fucking annoying for people who do.

And let me remind you those criminal stereotypes are stereotypes for a reason.

benbristow•15m ago
People on illegal escooters or illegal electric bikes are already committing crimes, there's rarely a decent reason to be wearing a balaclava in the city.

As I said, machine learning to take all these pointers into perspective.

MSFT_Edging•9m ago
In the age of everything being filmed in a panopticon, I look at the teens wearing balaclava and wonder where they bought theirs. Good on them for having a modicum of privacy.
embedding-shape•12m ago
Hook this up into the facial recognition tech they're in no doubt are already using, and then you could also collect data from people's social profiles, ensure they vote for the right parties and generally don't get into trouble like opposing mainstream political ideas and such things.

I've spent a whole of 15 seconds thinking about this and I don't foresee a single drawback here, lets just try it and see if we can prevent future crimes 100%, because then the future will have been saved.

toyg•10m ago
The degree to which the British underclasses adopted a dress-code in the late '80s (quite conveniently, for the authorities), is a social phenomenon that should be studied. They openly self-discriminate, willingly reducing opportunities and outcomes. Was it just evolutionary adaptation (tracksuits make it easier to run in dangerous situations), or was it pursuit of a tribal sense of belonging?