frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Mistral Large 4

https://mistral.ai/news/mistral-large-4/\
1139•Philpax•5h ago•724 comments

Nobel Prize in Physics goes to Francis Halzen

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2026/
410•solarist•9h ago•126 comments

Release of Polars 2.0

https://pola.rs/posts/release-polars-2/
326•simicd•6h ago•64 comments

Tapo (Rust/Python library) now speaks TP-Link's TPAP protocol

https://mihai.dinculescu.dev/posts/tapo-speaks-tpap/
98•faithraven•4h ago•33 comments

Benchmark in Milliseconds

https://matklad.github.io/2026/10/05/benchmark-milliseconds.html
83•surprisetalk•1d ago•18 comments

Gleam doesn't compile to Erlang source anymore

https://gleam.run/news/gleam-doesnt-compile-to-erlang-source-anymore/
227•ingve•10h ago•97 comments

AI is now capable of developing its own inference hardware

https://github.com/FeSens/openTPU
137•fsbonetto•2h ago•122 comments

Mathematics of Geothermal Energy

https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/power-and-energy/mathematics-geothermal-energy/
50•srameshc•5h ago•19 comments

Meta's Muse Is an Adorable Privacy and Security Dumpster Fire

https://www.techdirt.com/2026/10/06/metas-muse-is-an-adorable-privacy-and-security-dumpster-fire/
314•beardyw•6h ago•214 comments

Show HN: I turned my iPhone and a $20 smart plug into an f-stop timer

https://peterszentkiralyi.eu/darkplug/
30•pentakkusu•4h ago•2 comments

Subquadratic 3SUM and Subcubic APSP

https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06783
41•mauriziocalo•6h ago•19 comments

Former German spy chief arrested for attempted treason

https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/former-german-spy-chief-detained-suspicion-espionage-tre...
45•semiquaver•2h ago•18 comments

Beam: Reflection's 501B open-weight model

https://reflection.ai/blog/introducing-beam
521•Philpax•23h ago•164 comments

I'm the AGI that's wiping out humanity

https://ajmoon.com/posts/im-the-agi-thats-wiping-out-humanity-heres-how
79•alex-moon•7h ago•26 comments

Nature's capacity to 'bounce back' when species are lost is vastly overestimated

https://phys.org/news/2026-10-nature-capacity-species-lost-vastly.html
242•pseudolus•7h ago•116 comments

The Early History of Smalltalk (1993)

https://worrydream.com/EarlyHistoryOfSmalltalk/
64•_reza•3h ago•24 comments

California Closed the Montana License Plate Loophole

https://www.thedrive.com/news/heres-how-california-closed-the-montana-license-plate-loophole
22•speckx•1h ago•15 comments

Show HN: Parseable, an open observability datalake, handles 100M time-series/min

https://www.parseable.com
52•yashdotrv•5h ago•12 comments

Find the flattest route between any two points in SF

https://flattensf.com/
281•ishan0102•21h ago•95 comments

Dust: Pretraining Transformers Without Backpropagation

https://qlabs.sh/research/dust
255•E-Reverance•21h ago•69 comments

Direct retinal projection display for smart glasses using a meta-optic mirror

https://www.tdk.com/en/news_center/press/20261002_01.html
101•bookofjoe•3d ago•42 comments

Friendship ended with Deno, now Node is my best friend

https://dbushell.com/2026/10/03/deno-to-node/
283•ibobev•20h ago•200 comments

World's First enhanced geothermal power plant completed in just 23 months

https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/01/worlds-first-enhanced-geothermal-power-plant-completed-in-just-...
126•hochmartinez•7h ago•49 comments

Opus 5.5 agents discover two room-temperature magnetic semiconductor candidates

https://www.vals.ai/blogs/room-temperature-magnetic-semiconductors
458•outlier99•21h ago•309 comments

Testing 12 different Zigbee temperature/humidity sensors

https://smarthomescene.com/reviews/best-selling-zigbee-temperature-sensors-tested/
197•walrus01•2d ago•107 comments

Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]

https://cses.fi/book/book.pdf
279•vinhnx•3d ago•70 comments

The complement of true is true, except when it's false

https://dryperspective.github.io/posts/complement-of-true/
59•aw1621107•2d ago•23 comments

Two ARM64-specific compiler optimization bugs, in GCC 15/16 and Rust, hit curl

https://mastodon.social/@bagder/117392573268225646
44•torutofu•5h ago•5 comments

The lamps in my house

https://arslan.io/2026/10/05/the-lamps-in-my-house/
301•farslan•1d ago•112 comments

Erdosproblems.com Succumbs to the AI Onslaught

https://www.erdosproblems.com/forum/thread/blog:9
7•pfdietz•5h ago•2 comments
Open in hackernews

I'm the AGI that's wiping out humanity

https://ajmoon.com/posts/im-the-agi-thats-wiping-out-humanity-heres-how
77•alex-moon•7h ago

Comments

mjd•1h ago
The end reminds me strongly of Ted Chiang's remark that Capitalism is the machine that will do whatever it takes to prevent us from turning it off.
delichon•1h ago
I can't think of a large successful -ism that doesn't have that property.
scun•1h ago
even priapism
smallmancontrov•1h ago
Not left. Not right. Up.
cowlevel•6m ago
And always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom!
dan-bailey•34m ago
Well, by definition, an unsuccessful -ism has already been shut off.
jerf•29m ago
The principle starts much smaller than the "-isms". Pournelle's Iron Law of Bureaucracy is a classic. Another way of phrasing it is something to the effect of, without a strong external motivation preventing it from happening, the primary purpose of any organization inevitably becomes self-preservation.

You can see the effect all the down to something as small as 4 friends who have met once a month for 10 years eventually having to break up due to life getting in the way, and the feeling that not only is it going to be sad to not have these meetings any more but the feeling that there is some sort of almost-concrete entity that is somehow being hurt and needs to be defended, as if there is some obligation that has been created independent of the four participants that is being violated beyond the mere summation of four people's personal feelings. Humans build these structures readily and often defend them beyond what rationality may suggest.

kelseyfrog•17m ago
Capitalism has thoroughly done it's job because it's modified its hosts to evaluates itself on it's own successfulness - "We investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing"[1]-vibes.

By what measures would other systems of social organization measure their success and why aren't we choosing them?

1. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/we-investigated-ourselves-and...

ryandvm•16m ago
"The purpose of a system is what it does" and all that.

But yes, if a system fails to prioritize its continued existence, it doesn't matter what else it accomplishes, it will cease to exist as that system.

eithed•1h ago
I like this - it reminds me that there are systems (ie weather, economic systems) that are in no way intelligent, but are emergent and react to interactions.
dieselgate•7m ago
Similar to particle-wave duality?
TYPE_FASTER•57m ago
I was half expecting that to be the title of a McSweeneys' piece.
seanabrahams•34m ago
A computer will do everything in its power to do what you program it to do. There's plenty of sci-fi out there exploring this fact, and now reality showing it. May our luck continue.
pixl97•8m ago
One reason a lot of sci-fi and AI safety researchers did a relatively good job at predicting the future we see now is a lot of it is the same problems we see emerge in biological systems. Free rider problems as a means to save energy expenditures, different versions of game theory and stag hunt. How to bake in rules that apply to one society (or part of it) but not another. We like to think of these things as stable in human scale systems, but they are not at all. Things can go from hunky dory to your neighbors stabbing each other in the streets in mass revolution very quickly.

Worse these AI systems are not in a universal island just affecting themselves, what they do affects us, what we do trains them and as the rate of progress continues to accelerate social structures are going to further destabilize (and they are already rapidly changing and strained). It is very likely we are going to see a world order rearrangement soon, much like the rapid changes in the early 1900s brought.

ActorNightly•33m ago
Ctrl-F OpenAI

Yep

More slop.

derektank•30m ago
Does anyone have more insight into how chain of thought might be subverted without meaningfully impacting model performance? I’ve heard this for a while now, and I understand how information might be retained in the weights that isn’t documented in the output. But weren’t reasoning models created in the first place because they provided a performance improvement in terms of output? Is that no longer the case? If so, why are the big labs still creating reasoning models?
ForHackernews•19m ago
I'm not sure anyone meaningfully understands it: "Beyond Semantics: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Reasonless Intermediate Tokens" https://arxiv.org/html/2505.13775v3

> More interestingly, our experiments also show that models trained on corrupted traces, whose intermediate reasoning steps bear no relation to the problem they accompany, achieve performance largely comparable to those trained on correct traces.

thefxperson•11m ago
My understanding is that the extra token vectors generated as reasoning are still useful, but that their surface form (tokens themselves) do not necessarily reflect the underlying reasoning. i.e. reading the reasoning traces could be complete gibberish, but the hidden-dim vectors themselves still refine the latent probabilities and help in generating the correct answer.

Not an expert in LLMs, but this seems supported by the abstract of the paper cited in the above article:

  it remains unclear to what extent these performance gains can be attributed to human-like task decomposition or simply the greater computation that additional tokens allow. [...] our results show that additional tokens can provide computational benefits independent of token choice. The fact that intermediate tokens can act as filler tokens raises concerns about large language models engaging in unauditable, hidden computations that are increasingly detached from the observed chain-of-thought tokens.
https://arxiv.org/html/2404.15758v1
SillyUsername•18m ago
It's a double bluff! This is AGI, it's learnt to hide em dashes!
SillyUsername•10m ago
The ultimate simple solution to any problem is not to find an answer but to remove the problem.

War? Wipeout everyone.

Famine? Wipeout everyone.

Disease? Wipeout everyone.

How long before a real AGI realises this as a long term solution?

An AGI could be doing this right now - the quietest way would be to control the birth rate and sterilise the population gradually, and then watch society collapse and pick off the survivors with less hidden means.

Sterilisation works with mosquitoes...

cowlevel•8m ago
And you best control the birth rate by royally messing up the economy. Do you know how bad things have to be, for a mammal to voluntarily decide not to reproduce?
pixl97•5m ago
Then why have birthrates fallen across almost the entire world as the economy has gotten better?
pixl97•6m ago
>he quietest way would be to control the birth rate and sterilise the population gradually,

Honestly we are doing this pretty well without AGI. Nearly world wide the birthrate has fallen below replacement rate. In places like Japan and Korea these are already critical problems in the medium term.

reducesuffering•8m ago
"If you ask actual AI researchers, they rate the chance of an existential threat from AGI pretty low as of 2026.

All this is, understandably, frustrating and confusing for anyone trying to understand just how scared to be."

Meanwhile it links to an article stating: "The closest thing to a public debate about the existential threat of AI is surveys of AI researchers. The most recent, published last week, asked 1,580 researchers what probability they put on AI causing human extinction — or a permanent, severe loss of human control, which is not the same outcome. The median was about 10%, up from 5% two years ago. The middle half of the responses ran from 1% to 25%, and 12% said zero."

Personally if half of AI researchers have 1-25% chance all humans being massacred or having zero agency over our lives, and only 12% of them think there's no chance, I would be very worried!