Even Google themselves previously offered a no-auth way (just very niche): if you uploaded an image to Google Image search, and went to "About this image", it would show if the image was Google AI-generated. Now it doesn't.
URLs expand Googlebot’s indexes; pasted images don’t.
The textbox below it says Paste image link, but you can actually paste an image from your clipboard here, too.
More detail at https://deepmind.google/models/synthid/
For those who, like me, were hoping it was a vision model to identify synthesizer models from photos of concerts and music studios!
In many situations, photos are evidence. AI tools make convincing fakes, such as images of defect product.
This is the best SynthID write-up I've found so far: https://fyx.me/articles/attempting-model-extraction-of-googl...
It covers how it actually works (probably), and how to train your own classifier for it, with some seemingly decent results.
"Excellent work acquiring that outlook data Anat, now let's cross check the defunct company emails against YouTube videos edited with Google PrivateEditAI™ to figure out what the social security number of this YouTube account is."
> classifying images in bulk or offline
You've described exactly the elements spammers and fraudsters need to be able to defeat this mechanism.
Hey Gemini, find a synonym for every second adjective. Replace in text.
Hey Grok, find a synonym for every third proper noun. Replace in text.
Hey …
https://deepwalker.xyz/blog/evaluating-synthid-watermark-rob...
Or did it just become public
Edit:
Blog post today https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/go...
https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8912793-provenance-signa...
There is rate limit though
(While a sibling comment points out putting the image through Google Image Search as an alternative, I don't remember this being signposted in the support article I've read, so I unfortunately didn't know about it)
>I won't provide an operational recipe for stripping it, because the main use case is laundering AI content, which is deceptive and in many jurisdictions now illegal.
I suppose it was too convenient.
https://brand.io/article/spymarks/
We need to inform everyone that this technology can encode database identifiers and enough entropy to uniquely identify you as an author (or downloader).
This extends to other forms of media as well.
How hard can it be to download a set of real images and generated ones in order to train a model to detect and strip the watermark with minimal perceptual difference?
latexr•1h ago
giancarlostoro•1h ago
nonethewiser•17m ago