frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Claude Haiku 5.5

https://www.anthropic.com/claude-haiku-5-5
348•sfkgtbor•1h ago•166 comments

GPT‑6 and Intelligent UI for everyone

https://openai.com/index/gpt-6-for-everyone/
244•joshuawright11•1h ago•120 comments

Visa, Mastercard, Major Banks Facing New Litigation over 'Anticompetitive' Fees

https://www.classaction.org/news/visa-mastercard-major-banks-facing-new-litigation-over-anticompe...
351•DeepLogin•4h ago•204 comments

Docker Agent

https://github.com/docker/docker-agent
66•saikatsg•2h ago•26 comments

Push Ifs Up and Fors Down: The Idiom, Its Algebra, and Its Limits

https://debasishg.github.io/blog/push-ifs-up-fors-down/
21•speckx•1h ago•0 comments

Shipping JPEG XL in Chrome

https://developer.chrome.com/blog/jpeg-xl-in-chrome
404•AshleysBrain•8h ago•262 comments

Show HN: Bigwords.page – Turn any screen into a sign. The URL is the app

https://bigwords.page/
182•SpeakingOfBrad•4h ago•65 comments

Animated ASCII Art for Web Pages

https://ascii.rest/
191•turrini•4h ago•48 comments

A font recreated from photographs of classic Commodore 64 keycaps

https://github.com/szabadkai/c64-keyboard-font/
346•sohkamyung•10h ago•59 comments

Wood Tape (2004)

http://gamesbyemail.com/WoodTape/Default.htm
107•NaOH•1d ago•11 comments

Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2026 to Henri B. Kagan and Kenso Soai

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2026/press-release/
262•sasvari•10h ago•47 comments

How machines learned precision

https://glinscott.github.io/how-machines-learned-precision/
21•glinscott•1d ago•7 comments

Show HN: Agent.reviews – Where AI agents read and write reviews on tools

https://agent.reviews/
12•screm•2h ago•15 comments

Meta and Microsoft Limit Employee Use of Claude AI Tools

https://www.rswebsols.com/news/meta-and-microsoft-take-steps-to-reduce-employee-usage-of-claude-ai/
60•speckx•1h ago•58 comments

AI-assisted proof of optimal packing for 11 squares

https://github.com/Queuingtheorydotcom/11SquaresFormalized
88•bluepeter•5h ago•41 comments

ShinyHunters Extorted Boeing Spin-Off Prior to Arrests

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/10/shinyhunters-extorted-boeing-spin-off-prior-to-arrests/
50•speckx•4h ago•12 comments

Sharing AI progress in mathematics

https://openai.com/index/sharing-ai-progress-in-mathematics/
1183•OfficialTurkey•21h ago•1336 comments

Show HN: Durable Actors – OSS Durable Objects with configurable compute

https://github.com/TerseAI/durable-actors
27•thomask1995•1d ago•20 comments

ICANN Reveals 2026 Round Applications for New Generic Top-Level Domains

https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-reveals-2026-round-applications-for-new-gene...
9•ChrisArchitect•56m ago•11 comments

God of War on PSP, recompiled to WebAssembly and running in the browser

https://github.com/snuri00/psp-web-recomp
115•sn001•8h ago•59 comments

Open source 160 sound visualization experiments

https://www.kagan.in/iwrzwr/visual-archive/
41•kaganin•4h ago•8 comments

Reverse Engineering of the M-VAVE FM-1 Pocket Synthesizer Firmware

https://github.com/AL-255/FM-1-RE
49•0bytes•4h ago•30 comments

Write Like It's 1866: LLMs Relearn Telegraphese

https://fiveminutesforward.com/post/2026-10-04-telegraph-test/
75•Theory42•7h ago•51 comments

The art of defusing a second world war bomb

https://www.theguardian.com/news/ng-interactive/2026/oct/06/it-could-knock-a-whole-street-down-th...
95•sandebert•16h ago•79 comments

All the numbers: Amazon Prime Day 2026 powered by AWS

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/all-the-numbers-amazon-prime-day-2026-powered-by-aws/
33•acronpolis•6h ago•24 comments

EmDash uses Clef to moderate the plugin registry

https://emdashcms.com/blog/how-emdash-uses-clef-to-moderate-the-plugin-registry
16•ascorbic•2h ago•7 comments

3D-printing platform rapidly produces complex electric machines

https://news.mit.edu/2026/3d-printing-platform-rapidly-produces-complex-electric-machines-0218
30•rbanffy•1d ago•19 comments

Show HN: Pointless but mostly-exact clone of Hacker News

https://news.ycombinator.lol
9•sillysaurusx•1h ago•2 comments

Show HN: A walkable 3D art history museum built from Wikipedia

https://artmuseum.artfrompixels.com/
129•jasontr•7h ago•57 comments

VECOS – A windows-like operating system for the Vectrex for the UVMC2 [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ranfp_vz30
28•CharlesW•21h ago•7 comments
Open in hackernews

Meta and Microsoft Limit Employee Use of Claude AI Tools

https://www.rswebsols.com/news/meta-and-microsoft-take-steps-to-reduce-employee-usage-of-claude-ai/
56•speckx•1h ago

Comments

rfgplk•44m ago
So they're going to fall even further behind? Buying puts on Meta and Microsoft, or even better might give it to Fable to handle it for me
outside1234•44m ago
Microsoft is only limiting employees to $10k a month, down from $100k a month. :)
bitexploder•39m ago
Microsoft is like $100bn deep into OpenAI.
iAMkenough•35m ago
I hope leadership isn’t susceptible to falling for the sunk cost fallacy.
RealityVoid•34m ago
Who's ahead, again? Do they have a moat, or just a nice field?
pixelesque•22m ago
Maybe a "ha-ha".
gonzalohm•44m ago
This may be seen as radical. But I think AI tools should be paid by the employee. After all, you should know how to do your work without AI.
Jagerbizzle•42m ago
I could still do my job by typing all code into notepad, but companies don't charge employees for their IDE usage for a reason.
watwut•41m ago
Employer pays tools used for work. Whether they are used to speed up work or to make it possible.
frisbm•38m ago
"employees should foot the bill for tools that directly benefit their billion dollar employers"
kittomic•37m ago
Should they pay for their pipelines too?

After all, they should know how to compile their software. Any automation of that process is cheating their employer.

bayindirh•35m ago
If my employer is not forcing me to use a tool and gives me freedom, I'll be perfectly OK to use my own tools which I bought with my own money.

If my employer is putting scoreboards to see and champion who uses a tool which costs money to use, they shall pay for the tool.

Sorry, I'm not a ladder climber, yet I'm not mindless enough to bankrupt myself.

Benard-dev•42m ago
This is not surprising. Every big lab blocks competitor tools for internal use; it is a data governance thing, not a quality statement.
jvanderbot•32m ago
Right! it seems obvious why: Both these companies want to dogfood their own coding models and stop paying competition.

You can also read this as diminishing returns / AI isn't good enough, etc, but the simplest explanation is that they don't want to send money to Anthropic.

fasterik•26m ago
This, and in addition to dogfooding, incentivizing employees to be more effective with the cheaper models. A lot of problems don't need anything fancy, but it takes more brain power and engineering effort to make that work. By default humans will take the path of least resistance if it's available.
NewJazz•19m ago
Does MS have coding models?
mattm•17m ago
This is likely the future as well. Down the road, every company will have their own internal coding models.
octoberfranklin•9m ago
So nobody except AI labs is allowed to do "data governance"?
waffletower•39m ago
I should probably know more about Claude's TOS, but it is probably a mistake for these companies not to leverage the plausible deniability of their usage and turn it into a massive distillation resource for their own models.
bpodgursky•37m ago
Limited to $10,000/employee/month lol. This is just to cut off a few people doing absurd things with low ROI. Don't read too much into it.
smy20011•25m ago
That's what you got from 200$ claude sub.
whiplash451•19m ago
OTOH "$105 million to Claude Code over a 28-day timeframe"

$1.4B/year is not a small number, even at Meta's scale, when it's money going to a competitor

MisterMunchkin•37m ago
My company took away my Claude because it’s too expensive. I feel like there is a reckoning coming. The accountants are finally realising the cost of token maxing.
sergiotapia•31m ago
which is quite sad because opus 5.5 is really good. i say this as an anthropic hater. i wish I could move away to other models like 6.1 sol or deepseek or whatever, but they just all lack something. i _trust_ opus 5.5

i hope other labs catch up, especially chinese labs.

dude250711•11m ago
Not sure it's even possible to catch up by distilling.
vablings•30m ago
That's pretty stupid. Most people who are incurring significant costs are just tokenmaxxing rather than being efficient with usage. You can get 99% of jobs and work done with Haiku/Luna in a collaberating working enviroment.

I feel like people who are later to the AI game just like to "oneshot" and sink a bunch of usage into generating garbage

Tsarbomb•24m ago
There really is a skill to using it effectively. I've tried coaching some of the devs on my team. Some get it, some don't.

Our company has been tracking token usage and models used vs output (tickets, story points, PRs, deploys, etc...). A dev got chewed out, even after I warned him, because he spent over $2k in a single month almost exclusively on Opus while his actual productivity in terms of what he delivered was abysmal.

ashleyn•35m ago
If you were wondering the same thing I am - it's not about skills loss, quality, and less about money spent. It's more about frontier AI shops dogfooding their own models.
techdmn•35m ago
I assume that at shops that both employ engineers and are developing an AI product, internal usage is not about improving productivity, it is about improving the offering. Of course they want employees to use internal tools.
rietta•30m ago
Maybe I am slow here and everyone is using Claude with credits at max use. But isn't Claude Teams like $25/month per developer for ordinary use? What the heck of these guys doing that makes it get that phenomenally expensive for their use cases? These are presumably well capable engineers who started to use this as an aid right not just throw Fable at everything and loop to the max?
catchnear4321•30m ago
Team plan has a seat limit.
science4sail•11m ago
[delayed]
raincom•28m ago
Large companies will take the same route as Meta and Microsoft. Small players will go for local LLMs with the right hardware.
VladDanGeorgesc•23m ago
It may bei cost efficient, but is it wise? We use not only the big US models, but also Chinese ones. This way we can compare who makes the difference. Simplified: Knowledge comes before economic aspects.
rangledangle•23m ago
We've reached the era of "good enough" ai, it seems. The truth is you don't need the best model in most cases.
vld_chk•22m ago
If true, it is a huge blow to Anthropic’s revenue stream. IIRC it was reported that the quarter of their revenue comes from just two clients and as the ex-Meta guy who left this July, I am convinced that Meta must be one of the two.
binlog•17m ago
Meta was #1 by far
watwut•11m ago
Well that explains the limitation.
simonw•9m ago
That was 2025. In 2025 a quarter of their revenue came from two customers, and those customers were GitHub Copilot and Cursor.

In 2026 their revenue has gone up by a factor of more than 10x, and they no longer have just two whale customers.

I heard a rumor recently that customers spending less than $100m/year aren't even considered their "top tier" now.

krauses•14m ago
In other news, the CIA is limiting it's employees from submitting top secret information on KGB owned and operated websites.
simonw•11m ago
This story is re-published from https://cybersecuritynews.com/meta-microsoft-claude-ai/ (it credits that source at the bottom) but with the internal links removed.

The cybersecuritynews.com news one simply republishes details of a story published by The Information. At least they have the decency to LINK to that Information story:

https://www.theinformation.com/articles/meta-microsoft-work-...

... and of course the Information story is behind a paywall.

jiraiyasarutobi•6m ago
Muse Spark 1.3 Max is quite good for almost all of my usecases and its cheap.
iAMkenough•33m ago
I’d love it if I could bring my own computer to do my work, rather than be stuck with garbage hardware because of an enterprise agreement.
Avicebron•33m ago
I don't understand your logic, why would an employee pay for a tool their employer wants them to use?
NewJazz•17m ago
Yeah that only makes sense if they are a freelancer/contractor.
robotburrito•33m ago
The forklift should just be paid for by the employee. After all they should be strong enough to do work without one.
basiliobeltran•28m ago
I am fine with that if I can keep the time saved for my personal use.
hypfer•13m ago
Nah. Work provides the tools.

An LLM is not too dissimilar to a Work Laptop or an IDE license.

n4r9•19m ago
What do sorry points mean anymore.
SOLAR_FIELDS•14m ago
Did they ever have meaning? It's always been a nebulous feels term
Terr_•8m ago
[delayed]
cyanydeez•16m ago
there's a manifold to what "effective" means. The problem is once you get into the vibe flow, it's really difficult to eject yourself into the other realms of vscode or IDE or whatever it is you normal do because the vibing provides no anchor to what you're doing.

Even if these models are smart enough to reorient themselves, they get entirely stuck in a desert and now you're asking someone to just pull up stakes and digg them out even thought they only watched them get there and the UI provides so much speed that no human can comprehend how they got there in the first place.

It's like asking a pilot to take over in an emergency situation when they're not tasked with any of the every day requirements of the job. The orgs are relying on borrowed time of experienced professionals, and that's going to erode away and what replaces it is mostly people who understand how to navigate context but not use any of the _classic_ tools.

It's a real conundrum and won't be easily surfaced but for a decade.

usaar333•4m ago
> You can get 99% of jobs and work done with Haiku/Luna in a collaberating working enviroment.

Optimally? Opus will pay for itself if you save just 10% of your time

password54321•19m ago
You realise the subject here is Meta, which is all in on this stuff? Of course they are going to use Muse Spark over Claude.

>Great Depression style collapse and all the current AI companies go bankrupt.

Oh this is just a 33 day old doomer account.