frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Muse Spark Open

https://research.meta.ai/blog/muse-spark-open
543•bigwheels•5h ago•305 comments

What I Self-Host

https://viceconsole.fyi/blog/2026/10/10/what-i-self-host/
141•BrunoBernardino•2h ago•69 comments

Neural networks are clean

https://already-clean.goodfire.com/
440•themgt•6h ago•162 comments

Someone on Torrent Sites Kept Fucking with My Sonarr

https://thereallo.dev/blog/someone-on-torrent-sites-kept-fucking-with-my-sonarr-setup
142•speckx•3h ago•61 comments

Wayland desktop for Linux with skeuomorphic design

https://github.com/fyzugx/DEsk
460•FinalDestiny•9h ago•182 comments

Jev meets the Trolley Problem

https://zachlandes.com/trolley-problem/
235•zlandes86•6h ago•109 comments

AdFection: Targeted ads turned into a pipeline for zero-click mercenary spyware

https://citizenlab.ca/research/how-discover-tech-turned-targeted-ads-into-a-pipeline-for-spyware/
347•jcomp•12h ago•505 comments

Krea 3 – An image model built for editing at scale

https://www.krea.ai/krea-3
225•dvrp•6h ago•73 comments

The 8-mile hole in a Hawaii national park that no one can explain

https://www.sfgate.com/national-parks/article/hawaii-volcanoes-park-great-crack-22358849.php
20•elsewhen•1d ago•8 comments

Celebrating 70 Years of Fortran

https://fortran-lang.org/news/2026/09-15-Fortran-birthday/
197•rbanffy•7h ago•88 comments

Why I Wrote PGP (1991, revised 1999)

https://philzimmermann.com/EN/essays/WhyIWrotePGP.html
90•GaryBluto•1d ago•31 comments

E Ink Kaleido 4

https://www.eink.com/news/detail/EInk-Launches-Latest-Version-of-Color-ePaper-Platform-E-Ink-Kale...
104•Perroboc•4h ago•63 comments

Delta’s Biscoff cookies were supposed to be temporary

https://www.seriouseats.com/biscoff-history-12168161
157•mhb•1d ago•134 comments

Libreboot 26.10 "Ominous Olive" released with UEFI, Chromebook support

https://libreboot.org/news/libreboot2610.html
241•iamnothere•10h ago•138 comments

New Withings Users Must Pay $99/Year for Apple Health Syncing

https://support.withings.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/51887047154577-Unacceptable-Apple-Health-Sy...
113•johnbehnke•3h ago•99 comments

The engineering that allows articulated buses to bend

https://www.theautopian.com/you-wont-believe-the-incredible-engineering-that-allows-articulated-b...
53•CharlesW•21h ago•33 comments

Show HN: Unfenced – Land for sale that borders public land

https://unfenced.land/
242•otherwatersflow•11h ago•164 comments

Using AI to reverse engineer hardware

https://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2026/10/15/aiandreverseengineerhardware/
76•ErenayDev•8h ago•88 comments

Rediscovering the Romance of Travel Clocks

https://www.acollectedman.com/blogs/journal/rediscovering-travel-clocks
24•austinallegro•3d ago•5 comments

Simons Foundation launches $15M effort to help mathematicians navigate AI era

https://www.simonsfoundation.org/news/simons-foundation-launches-15m-effort-to-help-mathematician...
214•aaraujo002•8h ago•175 comments

Show HN: Flipflop – Iroh-powered persistent tunnels for filesharing

https://github.com/andunieee/flipflop
102•andunie•18h ago•59 comments

An Apology

https://www.elevationlab.com/blogs/news/an-apology
92•cdrnsf•18h ago•109 comments

Wanted to download an ISO, ended up writing a kernel exploit

https://blog.dfb.sh/blog/eap770-root-for-two-zeros/
336•0xdeafbeef•2d ago•166 comments

Show HN: Proa – A Rust web framework with fast SSR and multi-target rendering

https://proa.so/
77•burnrate•7h ago•18 comments

Steam Client is now faster than Epic's new vibe coded launcher

https://respawnfirst.com/steam-client-is-now-faster-than-epics-new-vibe-coded-launcher/
252•starkparker•6h ago•259 comments

C++26 Contracts: Introduction to Preconditions and Postconditions

https://www.cppstories.com/2026/cpp26_contracts/
119•ibobev•9h ago•110 comments

I know why the mathematicians weep

https://www.derekthompson.org/p/i-know-why-the-mathematicians-weep
325•RickJWagner•9h ago•529 comments

Game of Life – But Multiplayer, Hypermedia and Python

https://stario.dev/apps/life
41•bobowski•1d ago•17 comments

Prompt injection in HTTP headers: what 217M web responses show

https://www.signalscorps.com/blog/prompt-injection-in-http-headers/
80•panoramas4good•8h ago•16 comments

Things to know when you get cancer

https://jjmaxwell4.com/writing/things-to-know-when-you-get-cancer/
1842•jjmaxwell4•1d ago•442 comments
Open in hackernews

Call Center Jobs Are Declining, but 14,000 Calls Show Humans Still Outperform AI

https://boldagents.co/blog/call-center-jobs-declining-14000-calls-humans-outperform-ai
34•thomas_unise•47m ago

Comments

toomuchtodo•45m ago
https://legiscan.com/CA/text/AB1609/id/1418187

- California’s AB 1609 requires large businesses to connect customers with human agents within 15 minutes.

- Businesses exceeding $500 million in revenue must display wait times and disclose chatbot interactions.

- Violations carry civil penalties starting at $5,000, making human access a legal obligation.

redox99•43m ago
Having to waste 15 minutes with an AI is still crazy though.
gjsman-1000•41m ago
Nah, if it becomes law, we’ll get apps which just call a number for you and run out the clock.
toomuchtodo•40m ago
I believe Google and Apple phones support this today. “Hold assist” and “Hold for Me.”

https://support.apple.com/en-us/127521

https://support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/10071878?hl=en

odo1242•38m ago
Hold Assist doesn’t work if there’s any speech (like an AI agent) on the line, it specifically only works when on hold.
toomuchtodo•37m ago
Easily updated existing feature, code path, and user experience is the point. Just has to be good enough to iterate on.
jcastro•39m ago
> must display wait times

"We're sorry, we're receiving more calls than usual, stand by..."

24/7 for over 30 years!

toomuchtodo•38m ago
Configure agents for consumers at scale to report violations to regulators. Wait time not accurate or communicated? Complaint filed. Human agent not available within time limit? Complaint filed.

Think about all the time and effort for all of the consumers in the aggregate that would be needed to hold corporate counter parties accountable, with the cost being code and some compute time on device. This is where AI agents shine. They can do the mundane work of capturing evidence of compliance violations, packing the violation event, and reporting them.

Every consumer’s phone becomes a regulator watchdog node. We can even use LLMs to rapidly ship the app(s) needed to do this.

seattle_spring•18m ago
The provider for Chase credit card claims (insurance, price match, etc.) went through a company, EClaimsLine, that had nearly that exact phrase bold and red on their website for many, many years. I'm honestly shocked that their new website after the rebrand to Chase Card Services doesn't say it too.
dmitrygr•21m ago
> AB1609

Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2016-11-30

dataflow•10m ago
I wonder how many companies are going to trivially get around this by connecting you to an operator that makes you wait to be connected to the other department because they can't handle anything and only route calls.
add-sub-mul-div•38m ago
The AI era isn't about what performs best. It's about what can be delivered most cheaply and isn't a liability because your competition will be doing the same thing.
symfoniq•37m ago
AI “customer service” is so incredibly bad. I’ve not had a single interaction that an AI agent could solve. It’s just a huge waste of my time and an increase in aggravation.
LPisGood•36m ago
My assumption is that it is there to make the process less convenient so people only use it if they really need to.
10xDev•34m ago
If it is an LLM, it has been prompted to say almost nothing except prewritten responses to avoid legal issues or to avoid free LLM usage. I think it was Chipotle support that would write code if you asked it.
onlyrealcuzzo•32m ago
AT&T & Comcast figured out how to have incredibly bad automated service quite a while before LLMs.
augment_me•29m ago
It's a really good way to offload costs to the customer. You make the process so full of friction that the customer feels like it's not worth the process to make the return. Works the best with big monopolies
seattle_spring•21m ago
I'm 100% convinced that this is the reason so many customer service jobs are being shelved.

No one who actually wants to provide a good experience for their customers would offshore, nor would they offload this to AI agents. They know that customers have very limited opportunities nowadays, so the company responses seem to be along the lines of, "fine, go somewhere else! Oh, there's nowhere else to go? I guess you'll be staying with us afterall muahaha!"

10xDev•36m ago
"AI"

Usually when I chat with a support bot it doesn't feel like an LLM but something that performs keyword matching and a prewritten response pre-LLM era.

gdulli•33m ago
I hate it either way, because my typical issue is something bespoke that needs a human to resolve. Or else I wouldn't be reaching out.
dmd•28m ago
HN readers - and even more so HN commentators - are not typical though. Literally 99% of people interacting really are asking a question answered by the FAQ, just like 99% of people calling the customer service number for their credit card want to pay their bill or find out their balance.
dmitrygr•22m ago
So then offer the shibboleet option! https://xkcd.com/806/
arjie•17m ago
Doesn’t work anymore. Our apartment building has a few providers and people were trying to report an outage with ASNs specified and suggesting they check BGP advertisements and so on. It turns out our Google Fiber microwave dishes were misaligned.

But all shibboleths are obsolete now.

mym1990•31m ago
I don't know how much more cost effective AI bots are for customer service over offshore call centers currently, but I would guess that the industry sees the AI tooling getting much better over the next X years, while call center agents are going to be relatively level in terms of skill, so companies are investing early on in the technology. To be honest, my favorite customer service experience are ones where I tell a bot the issue, and they just refund me my cost, widely seen on delivery apps and Amazon. This is ripe for moral hazard but I'm sure there is monitoring happening for that as well.
alephnerd•21m ago
> I don't know how much more cost effective AI bots are for customer service over offshore call centers currently

They are already fairly cost effective. A the Corporate VC arms of the major call center and BPO players like Infosys, TCS, and others have already funded a large portion of TTS startups, and in a lot of cases are training on customer calls.

There's a reason ElevenLabs, Deepgram, and others are the giants they are now.

plasticeagle•6m ago
"so companies are investing early on in the technology."

But this doesn't make sense. The AI bots are worse at the job, across all metrics, other than being cheaper. They're not "investing in the technology" in the sense of actual investment. They are just trying to save money. That's it.

If they cared about the experience of their customers, they wouldn't touch these things with a barge pole.

sdthjbvuiiijbb•30m ago
This is published by Bold Agents, a company that appears to provide a platform for AI customer service agents, and is based on their own data. Doesn't this really just mean that they're saying that their own product kind of sucks?

I believe Sierra is the market leader in this space with a few other companies like Salesforce and Decagon also competing. It would be more interesting to see an evaluation of performance by these parties before making sweeping claims about the performance of AI agents as a whole.

TrainedMonkey•26m ago
Some, maybe most, humans outperform AI. I've had some calls where I would have preferred an AI that could not understand me to an agent whom I could not understand AND who could barely understand me.
ge96•26m ago
Man that annoys me calling some place and it's that openai voice answering
silverFork•23m ago
don't worry, they will make Ai listen to the calls with human agents and in about a year, it will out perform them. Have you heard that "this call will be recorded" blah blah.. Now they will use those recordings... Time is on their side.
dmitrygr•23m ago
Support has costs. Fine. I consider purchases under $500 to not include support, and treat them all as "sold as is"

However, if I need support and cannot reach a real living breathing human in under 30 min regarding any purchase over $500, I hang up, call AmEx and file a chargeback, citing inability to gain support. So far they have backed me every time. If enough people do it, chargeback costs send the message.

bluedino•11m ago
I've used some great AI support agents/bots, whatever they're called. An example of a great one is Lemonade (the insurance company).

Most of the others are terrible. I'll pick on Dell for this next one. Their website in general, is terrible. Why would their support agent be any better?

We purchased a switch from Dell, that cost more than my SUV. Having a hardware issue with it, can't remember if it was fans or a power supply or what. It needs someone to come out and repair it, and we have the big fancy service plan.

There's no way to find the switch on the Dell support website. It's not listed anywhere.

https://www.dell.com/support/home/en-us/products/networking_...

You can't actually contact support, you have to identify your device, and then you get options from there.

https://www.dell.com/support/incidents-online/en-us/contactu...

However, this product doesn't have a service tag, or express service code, so you can't do that.

So you try to use the 'Virtual Assistant', who has no idea what you're trying to tell it, no matter which way you try. They link to a contact page but you just end up getting looped back around. There is no useful information to be extracted from this dumb thing.

I finally found a phone number on the website, and was connected to a woman who sounded like she was smoking cigarettes in a basement somewhere in Alabama. She looked through her notes on the computer, and found out for this particular switch I need to go through the OEM manufacturer. I was relieved to have gotten useful information.

plasticeagle•8m ago
AI slop article, of course.

It can be summed up thus : AI agents answer the phone slightly more often, but they get hung up on 7 times more often than humans. Overall they make customer service and your business work much worse.

It is also a bullshit advertorial for a product; In this case, an AI sales agent. There is (almost) no worse idea in human history than an AI agent trying to sell things to people. Their entire website is AI generated, and is so stuffed full of slop that it's impossible to read.

Forgeties79•7m ago
The problem is it doesn’t matter if they perform better. If AI is just above “too shitty” and costs less, that’s what businesses will generally choose. And that’s the entire problem. “Good enough” reigns supreme for most businesses. In some cases that’s fine, in a lot of others it just tests our patience/tolerance and makes things painful.
gradus_ad•4m ago
1-800 Contacts has my undying love because their customer support is excellent and seamless. I wouldn't say I look forward to calling them, but it's just so simple and effortless.
f311a•17m ago
Some customers are smart too, they just use their own agents to flood support agents until the problem is resolved.
missedthecue•21m ago
A lot of the HN crowd is a lot more technically capable than the average consumer. The more competent customers never see the 80-90% of inbound ticket volume that are items answered in FAQs that can be solved with an AI agent. They only know they had an edge case problem they couldn't resolve after quite a bit of effort. And the AI agent and canned responses were totally useless and frustrating barriers to the real help you needed (a person).

After putting in AI agents this year, our customer service scores went up considerably. And the reason was basically that the average customer was getting way faster answers to queries.

dataflow•16m ago
How does the average customer even get a hold of a human in the first place? The bots are so aggressively unwilling to connect you that I sometimes fail.
missedthecue•6m ago
We only have chat/email based support, no experience in phone trees. If the agent determines the question is outside of defined scope, it puts it into the human queue. We are seeing very low rates of improper filtering (i.e., people never making it to the human queue).

This is not a plug and play customer bot product, we actually built a custom solution on top of Bedrock.

tintor•12m ago
Average scores going up, but what about tail? 90th / 95th / 99th percentile
missedthecue•10m ago
For us, they are still at the same scores as before AI agents.
lkbm•15m ago
I've gotten automatic refunds from Amazon bots. (I also got automatic credit from Lyft, but I consider that a failure because I wanted my money back.)