frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

Giving chat feedback gives Anthropic your data

https://privacy.claude.com/en/articles/7996868-is-my-data-used-for-model-training
71•jonpizza•1h ago

Comments

fxwin•1h ago
... what else would we expect it to do?

> When you provide us feedback via our thumbs up / down button, we will store the entire related conversation, including any content, custom styles, conversation preferences, or model settings, in our secured back-end for up to 5 years. [...] We do not combine your feedback with your other conversations with Claude.

another-dave•51m ago
Generally (and with Anthropic), enterprise plans aren't used for training / tracking / targetting.

There's a whole spectrum of things they could do from most to least aligned with that as a principle.

For example, they could have a thumbs up/down

- just track the metadata of the conversation (e.g. model used, how far through its context it was, how old the session was) - track metadata of the user as a whole (how often they use Claude, how many other "active" conversations they have on the go, how much they've tested other models, if this is their first time using new tweaks to params etc) - have contextual feedback of the chat available for humans to review (alongside the comments you put in the feedback), but not explicitly train on it.

Whereas the option they've chosen is:

> If you explicitly report feedback or bugs to us (e.g. via our thumbs up/down feedback button), or otherwise choose to allow us to use your data, then we may use your chats and coding sessions to train our models.

So literally using your session as training input. They also could've allowed this to be an opt-in on bug reports.

ForHackernews•36m ago
"So here's how ThanosCorp isn't living up to the altruistic spirit of the ToS for their Human Extinction Project..."
raverbashing•33m ago
Well, again, how did people expect that to work

> - just track the metadata of the conversation

This is useless

saurik•49m ago
I would expect that, if you turned off the feature where they can use your data, that they would remove those features, so you don't either accidentally click them or fail to understand that it isn't some kind of local-to-your-account mechanism.
unsloppable•45m ago
I find the lack of privacy forward thinking from a company I pay a couple hundred a month to kind of atrocious. They're buying no loyalty.
selectedambient•53m ago
and sky blue
skeledrew•47m ago
If they don't use the available data, how do they act on the feedback?
xattt•35m ago
Hallucinating what might have been.
_ink_•36m ago
Is this also the case when you answer that how is Claude doing question in Claude Code?
Foxhuls•26m ago
Yes according to the following:

https://privacy.claude.com/en/articles/10023580-is-my-data-u...

The link in the post is for the API and commercial offerings. With that said, as others have already pointed out, how else could they actually make use of the feedback without the data that the feedback was given on.

_ink_•6m ago
I think it's still a shitty move and I feel deceived. I opted out of training and it's impossible to see for me (in any practical sense, sure it's somewhere in the ToS) that this simple question leads to my data being stored for 5 years and potentially read by human reviewers.

If I opted out, then don't ask me this deceiving question or make it very obvious that answering it has these consequences.

altmanaltman•2m ago
more like "what is Claude doing"
felixarba•34m ago
Did anyone who has any connection with tech not expect this? If you rate a specific conversation, did you not expect this conversation to go into training or at least review?

You are explicitly telling them "this is good / bad"...

caaqil•25m ago
> did you not expect this conversation to go into training or at least review?

Use it for training/review (RLHF, whatever) and "we load the whole thread, not the specific response or surrounding few prompts, and store it for 5 years" seem completely different things. It's not obvious why being tech savvy would automatically make one aware that the 2nd version is happening.

origini•18m ago
My non tech people didn't even know that everyone can edit Wikipedia.

And to be fair to them, my motivation to send quite a lot of personal data to an LLM is shockingly high.

I send medical data to openai while I never ever send any AI provider an Image of me or my wife despite me wanting to do Star Wars montages and Studio Ghibli avatars.

I disabled Gemini Activity history because they told me that they will let humans look over it, but I gave claude access to my laptop.

There is a reason why we have consumer protection. Life doesn't need to be hard by default :D

ForHackernews•34m ago
Sophisticated technology experts shocked to find world's 4th largest data-ingestion machine ingesting their data.
thatsabadlook•32m ago
It is pretty funny when you think about it. The shock and awe of it all...
epistasis•28m ago
I complain at Claude all the time, but do not submit feedback becuase of this exact reason, and because I knew it I assumed everyone knew it...
paxy•28m ago
User: Hey Anthropic, this response was terrible.

Anthropic: Really? Let me read it and see why.

User: How dare you look at my data!!!

vilaca•26m ago
Giving chat feedback gives Anthropic even more of your data
lkbm•24m ago
As noted in the article, the feedback form says:

> Submitting this report will send the entire current conversation to Anthropic for future improvements to our models. Learn More

So I'm not sure why this is being posted to HN. This is nothing new, and nothing not known by anyone who has ever provided feedback.

nananana9•23m ago
Is this only about when you explicitly click on a thumbs up/down button and provide a message, or is it also for the nagware "How is claude doing today [1] bad [2] fine [3] good" that shows up after 15 minutes of work in the CLI and and requires literally pressing 1 key while in the prompt input field to "send feedback"?

I always press 3 to just get it out of the way (although I treat anything I send OAI/Anthropic as training data, so I don't really care) but if this little popup counts, I wouldn't be surprised if the vast majority of CC sessions out there are now "feedback training data"

TheRoque•23m ago
I always press 0 (dismiss), but is there a Way to stop prompting me to feedback ?
hmokiguess•22m ago
you can disable telemetry, but that also disables remote control which sucks
spenvo•22m ago
And how do you know that, just dismissing it isn't considered "feedback".
mapontosevenths•10m ago
Someone above makes the claim that dismissing it with '0' counts as feedback and sends it.
armchairhacker•20m ago
That's why I never give feedback, ensuring Anthropic has no access to my Claude chats.
loufe•5m ago
In what way are you "ensuring" it? They still have a plaintext copy on their servers and could ad arbitrarily decide to train on it (for instance, saying it raised a safety flag).
spenvo•20m ago
In Claude Code, even just dismissing the feedback may be considered "feedback". I wrote about it here: https://keydiscussions.com/2025/09/29/dont-even-dismiss-the-... The most common feedback on these posts is always "what did you expect?" ....... Man, the reason I signed up for one service over the other in the first place is often because of the promises these companies make on the front end, about what they do or don't do with my data. Anthropic made very explicit, strong promises in this area <on the sign up/plans screen>, and so of course it disappoints me when I feel like the company I'm paying hundreds of dollars per month to is trying to sneak a peak. I literally think differently and self-censor when I think my work is being surveilled or stolen, which makes me less productive.
hmokiguess•17m ago
That's very deceiving and should warrant a class action law suit in my opinion
loufe•7m ago
That link is speculation at best. I wouldn't tell my family yet not to do that. Insane if true, but let's not jump at speculation.
spenvo•5m ago
The fact that Claude Code told me "thanks for the feedback … and thanks for helping to improve Anthropic’s models" when I pressed 0 to "dismiss" is not speculation, that's what the product did. I agree though that whether Anthropic actually considers it "feedback" for the purposes of a privacy loophole (vs. it being a sloppy response) is anyone's guess.
edg5000•16m ago
I used to care about this initially, but now I don't. How can them having my data, mostly engineering work on niche (small market) products hurt me? An they need to know what's going on, how else would they ever improve the product? Benchmarks?
mapontosevenths•12m ago
> How can them having my data, mostly engineering work on niche (small market) products hurt me?

They will train on it, and now competitors or future competitors will know about your niche, the specific problems you face within it, and how to solve them without doing the work that you did to get there.

thewhitetulip•10m ago
Lol people are giving feedback?!?!

Talk about Actively training your replacement

Just go and poison data on Reddit. I opened a Flock camera and it had a diamond coating inside! Their website doesn't contain this hidden gem of an information

bix6•2m ago
Counterclaim? I never hit feedback because it’s all dark patterned.

PHP2Shell: Exploitation Attempts and Remediation Trends

https://www.wiz.io/blog/php2shell-exploitation-so-far
85•acossta•1h ago•28 comments

Python's experimental JIT to be removed

https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1102102/0c00e4d550f25f8c/
200•f311a•3h ago•113 comments

AI promised less work. I've never worked more

https://oioannou.com/blog/ai-promised-less-work/
379•oorestisime•4h ago•338 comments

Wikipedia's Cleanup of AI-Generated Content

https://spectrum.ieee.org/wikipedia-wikiproject-ai-writing-cleanup
186•rbanffy•4h ago•82 comments

Here Be Monsters: What Do You Still Need to Know When Agents Do the Work?

https://blog.adrq.dev/here-be-monsters-what-do-you-still-need-to-know-when-agents-do-the-work
48•adrq•1h ago•13 comments

Giving chat feedback gives Anthropic your data

https://privacy.claude.com/en/articles/7996868-is-my-data-used-for-model-training
73•jonpizza•1h ago•37 comments

The US Government Is Hiding Secret Court Ruling About How It Spies on Americans

https://www.wired.com/story/the-us-government-is-hiding-a-secret-court-ruling-about-how-it-spies-...
101•helterskelter2•1h ago•10 comments

Software may be getting worse, but it used to be horrible

https://www.bitlog.com/2026/10/27/software-may-be-getting-worse-but-it-used-to-be-horrible/
191•jakevoytko•3h ago•144 comments

Three new discoveries in mathematics, computer science, and physics

https://openai.com/index/building-scientific-understanding-with-academic-communities/
1046•jonluca•17h ago•582 comments

The Mythical Man-Month in the Age of AI

https://j11g.com/the-mythical-man-month-in-the-age-of-ai
315•ilreb•8h ago•201 comments

Viral Polls Are Not Representative Polls

https://kevinreuning.com/blog/polling_virality.html
6•m-hodges•26m ago•1 comments

Gforth 1.0

https://gforth.org/manual/1.0/NEWS.html
88•joshcsimmons•4h ago•5 comments

New iMac with M6

https://www.apple.com/imac/
86•notfried•2h ago•70 comments

Why Micron Is Suddenly Ditching 4F² DRAM as Rivals Double Down

https://hothardware.com/news/why-micron-is-suddenly-ditching-4f-dram
17•rbanffy•1d ago•2 comments

The Exponential Time Hypothesis Is False [pdf]

https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/The-Exponential-Time-Hypothesis-is-False-Octob...
725•vok•17h ago•257 comments

A Stackless Floodfill Automaton

https://t3x.org/files/floodfill.pdf
9•andsoitis•1d ago•2 comments

Roblox downloaded 145GB models from us (including adult content) without asking

https://open3dlab.com/news/roblox-downloaded-145-gb-of-models-from-our-sites/
370•choult•4h ago•220 comments

Sebastian Raschka's from-scratch video course on building reasoning models

https://magazine.sebastianraschka.com/p/building-reasoning-models
788•sgiannopoulos•1d ago•105 comments

Alleged Israeli spy company targeted Starlink users

https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/alleged-israeli-spy-company-heavily-targeted-starl...
57•mmaia•1h ago•6 comments

188-Year-Old Mystery of Photography's First Human Subjects Solved

https://news.artnet.com/art-world/daguerre-photograph-subjects-location-2826596
28•bookofjoe•3d ago•6 comments

Kauldron: Modular, scalable library to train ML models

https://github.com/google-research/kauldron
17•nateb2022•1d ago•2 comments

Oldest GUI application that still runs on Windows 11

https://blog.enlyth.com/posts/oldest-windows-gui-app-win-11/
496•enlyth•21h ago•293 comments

Solar power is becoming bigger than nuclear

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20261023-how-solar-became-bigger-than-nuclear
459•geox•23h ago•647 comments

I still teach OpenGL ES 3.0

https://eliasfarhan.ch/graphics/cpp/2026/01/27/why-i-teach-opengles.html
116•majorchord•13h ago•71 comments

CSS-Tricks has a new owner

https://css-tricks.com/css-tricks-has-a-new-owner/
526•edent•23h ago•109 comments

Type Server Protocol

https://github.com/microsoft/pylance-release/blob/main/docs/tsp/type-server-protocol.md
259•adamnemecek•21h ago•172 comments

Writing about pratt parsing so I remember it

https://www.unix.dog/~yosh/blog/2026-10-25_pratt-parsing.html
71•dverlaeckt80•9h ago•6 comments

A Printer Printing onto Paper

https://twitter.com/macrofying/status/2112904628509528219
174•MrBuddyCasino•4d ago•42 comments

How to grow a cacao tree at home (2024)

https://www.cocoterra.com/guide-on-how-to-grow-chocolate-at-home/
127•felipevb•1d ago•39 comments

Cross-request KV cache exposure in the GLM-5.3 Workers AI model (155 responses)

https://blog.cloudflare.com/kv-cache-exposure-remediation/
164•wondersky•16h ago•66 comments