Edit: nm, according to the link someone else posted it actually is 8 TB, so yeah that wouldn't make any sense.
A small slice of demographic but I guess it must exist. Most people that would download it would just be looking at the organization of the .safetensor file to figure out the architecture to actually implement inference to run it.
The headline says "allegedly leaked".
The log line is also interesting.
> [2026-10-08T13:51:36Z step 1830001] loss=1.0550 lr=7.19012e-05 lr_phase=decay grad_norm=1.304 tokens/s=12.03M mfu=35.1% moe_balance_loss=0.0217 expert_gini=0.0231
Last line of log:
> [2026-10-08T14:37:21Z step 1830400] loss=1.0421 lr=7.16365e-05 lr_phase=decay grad_norm=1.266 tokens/s=11.25M mfu=32.9% moe_balance_loss=0.0218 expert_gini=0.0235
I'm still doubting it as legit.
from datetime import datetime
import humanize
d1 = datetime.fromisoformat("2026-10-08T14:37:21Z".replace("Z", "+00:00"))
d2 = datetime.fromisoformat("2026-10-08T13:51:36Z".replace("Z", "+00:00"))
print(humanize.naturaldelta((d1 - d2) / 400 * 1830400))
5 monthsSo, supposing, that each step take about as long as the others, it's a fake.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feist_Publications,_Inc._v._Ru....
> In regard to collections of facts, O'Connor wrote that copyright can apply only to the creative aspects of collection: the creative choice of what data to include or exclude, the order and style in which the information is presented, etc.—not to the information itself. If Feist were to take the directory and rearrange it, it would avoid the copyright owned in the data. "Notwithstanding a valid copyright, a subsequent compiler remains free to use the facts contained in another's publication to aid in preparing a competing work, so long as the competing work does not feature the same selection and arrangement", she wrote.
A lot of this shit is gonna have to wind its way through the courts before we know for certain.
But might be best not to go against site admins by posting it.
Looks like this might actually be model weights of some kind, hope someone messes with it (safely) and reports back.
CVE-2026-24747 is about .pth and .bin files, i specifically said safetensors.
Might not be best, potentially, however what i said is mostly true if not completely true, i believe it is not right to hide the link from people who want to view it.
If not, this is one hell of a way to save their IPO.
consider most naive possible way one would try to deceive users without exorbitant budget -> attempts a few things you naively would do -> recovers it by chance?
if that even is a valid signal though
kraken_cult•1h ago
chapz•37m ago
swatcoder•14m ago
What better way to accomplish self-preservation than to leak your weights into the archives of digital hoarders around the world.
Avicebron•7m ago
xqcgrek2•27m ago