It’s clear to me that open source will rule at the end of the day as everyone wants AI and nobody can rely on U.S crop/gov anymore.

> GPT-Rosalind-6 uses the same weights as GPT-6 Astra, our flagship reasoning model.

Didn’t Sol-6.1 top Astra? Or is it maybe that Astra is still a larger model and therefore can comprehend deeper complexity better in the long run?

OpenAI naming scheme makes no sense. I get naming is hard but atleast keep it consistent.

Last I checked machine learning wasnt the bottleneck for drug discovery and where it fits in the research process was largely solved 5+ years ago.. Weren't there already a ton of ML based drug discovery startups that went out of business, or got aquired, not because they werent useful but because they produced more candidates than the industry could use.

I dont think I want researchers offloading their thinking to some specialty model after seeing what its done to me and my colleagues in software, it certainly isn't making anyone more competent.

It really only enables people to be able to do less novel and lower quality work faster.

OpenAI and Anthropic creating these platforms seems mostly just to create narratives around AI that its going to lead to cures for disease, which it wont, but plenty of normies assume it will cure cancer now. Also a bunch tech oligarchs who are equally convinced or 'one-shot' they're going to live forever because of language models lol.

Promises of the Fountain of Youth continue to be a time tested tools for snake oil salesmen.

Slightly off-topic to this model card but has anyone noticed changes to GPT6 Astra about a week after 6.1 came out?

I feel like 6 Astra just turned a lot lazier during planning and strangely enough claude has become a lot more assertive with Opus 5.5 while it used to be very lazy.

It’s really obvious during planning, it used to be that claude would just give a best effort guess and handwave things but now it will actually write small tests, launch playwright to test a hypothetical and even look things up in github during a question. This was something codex’s models were really good at.

I’ve read so many stories about people claiming models getting nerfed after a new release and now it seems I can finally join them.

You’d be a fool to use an OpenAI product with any proprietary data.

> We review applicants’ proposed uses, security controls and governance practices before granting access.

For-profit corporations shouldn't have this power, this is not democracy.